Article published In: Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages: Online-First Articles
Eski fitir-la touzour insertin? Is the future still uncertain?
The acceptability of Mauritian Creole’s elusive VA marker in future contexts
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Oxford.
Published online: 2 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav
Abstract
Most research regarding Mauritian Creole future marking was carried out in the 1990s and assumed differences in
‘certainty’ dictated the choice of future marker (. 1993. Contribution
à l’histoire du futur en créole mauricien. Etudes
Créoles 16(1). 87–100.; Hazaël-Massieux, Guy. 1993. L’expression
du futur en créole mauricien, Etudes
Creoles. 16(1). 61–75.; Touchard, Yves & Daniel Véronique. 1993. À
propos d’une enquête sur pu et va en mauricien. Etudes
Creoles 16(1). 76–86.). The
consensus was that the two main markers, POU and VA, were used for ‘definite’ and ‘indefinite’
future events respectively. However, this distinction was inadequately defined, and although intuitively solid, it could not
account for many naturally occurring instances. Davidson, Hannah. 2021. The
development of tense, mood and aspect markers in Mauritian Creole. Unpublished PhD
thesis. University of Oxford. quantified a range of
features relevant for future expression and a new obligation meaning of VA was mentioned by some speakers. In
this paper, we explore in more detail the POU/VA opposition, considering contexts with different nuances of
obligation/necessity and their compatibility with VA. Overall, VA is more acceptable in contexts
which can be interpreted as obligation/necessity and it is now not only restricted to indefinite or ‘less certain’ contexts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous research
- 2.1Mauritian Creole future marking
- 2.2Grammaticalization
- 2.3Previous results regarding VA
- 3.Current acceptability judgement follow-up
- 3.1Method
- 4.Results
- 4.1Mean results for relevant sentences
- Context 11
- Context 7–9
- Context 3
- Context 18
- Context 19
- Context 12
- 4.2Case study of three of the participants
- 4.1Mean results for relevant sentences
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
Bibliography
References (32)
Baker, Philip & Guillaume Fon Sing. 2007. The
making of Mauritian Creole: analyses diachroniques à partir des textes
anciens. London: Battlebridge Publications. [URL] (26 July,
2020).
Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: the evaluative
superstructure of language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, & William Pagliuca. 1994. The
evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the
world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The Principle of Contrast: A
Constraint on Language Acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms
of language acquisition, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical Typology, Suppletion,
and Possible
Words, Language 83(1). 8–42.
Davidson, Hannah. 2021. The
development of tense, mood and aspect markers in Mauritian Creole. Unpublished PhD
thesis. University of Oxford.
. 2022. The
evolution of the (in)definite future markers POU and VA ni 20th century Mauritian
Creole. Etudes
Creoles 39(1–2). Available at: [URL] (accessed 06/05/25).
Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.). 2014. COME
and GO off the beaten grammaticalization
path. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Gabelentz, Georg von der. [1891] 1901. Die Sprachwissenshaft: Ihre
Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, Second
Edition. Leipzig: Weigel (reprint Tübingen: Narr 1972).
Gelderen, Elly van (ed.). 2009. Cyclical
Change (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
146). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2016. Cyclical Change
Continued (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
227). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2017. Cyclicity. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Historical
Syntax, 467–488. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gougenheim, Georges. 1971. Étude
sur les périphrases verbales de la langue
française. Paris: A.-G. Nizet.
Hazaël-Massieux, Guy. 1993. L’expression
du futur en créole mauricien, Etudes
Creoles. 16(1). 61–75.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World
Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Second
Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lalit. 2019. Lalit
Mauritius. Available at: [URL] (accessed 31/03/25).
Le Juge de Segrais, X. (1976). Quarante
zolies zistoires missié La fontaine. Port Louis: Mauritius Printing Cy.
Schäfer-Prieß, Barbara. 1999. Lateinische
und romanische Periphrasen mit ‘haben’ und Infinitiv: zwischen ‘Obligation’, ‘Futur’ und
‘Vermutung’. In Jürgen Lang & Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse
und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen
Sprachen, 97–110. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Smith, John Charles. 2006. How to do things without
junk. The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and
Romance. In Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), New
Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. II: Phonetics, Phonology and Dialectology. Selected
papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Austin,
Texas, February
2005, 183–205. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Touchard, Yves & Daniel Véronique. 1993. À
propos d’une enquête sur pu et va en mauricien. Etudes
Creoles 16(1). 76–86.