References (32)
Bibliography
Baker, Philip. 1972. Kreol: A Description of Mauritian Creole. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Contribution à l’histoire du futur en créole mauricien. Etudes Créoles 16(1). 87–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Philip & Guillaume Fon Sing. 2007. The making of Mauritian Creole: analyses diachroniques à partir des textes anciens. London: Battlebridge Publications. [URL] (26 July, 2020).
Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: the evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words, Language 83(1). 8–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Hannah. 2021. The development of tense, mood and aspect markers in Mauritian Creole. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Oxford.
. 2022. The evolution of the (in)definite future markers POU and VA ni 20th century Mauritian Creole. Etudes Creoles 39(1–2). Available at: [URL] (accessed 06/05/25).
Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.). 2014. COME and GO off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der. [1891] 1901. Die Sprachwissenshaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, Second Edition. Leipzig: Weigel (reprint Tübingen: Narr 1972).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van (ed.). 2009. Cyclical Change (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Cyclical Change Continued (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Cyclicity. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, 467–488. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goorvadoo, Darshinee. 2024. Personal Communication. 18/10/24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gougenheim, Georges. 1971. Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française. Paris: A.-G. Nizet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hazaël-Massieux, Guy. 1993. L’expression du futur en créole mauricien, Etudes Creoles. 16(1). 61–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst and Søn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lalit. 2019. Lalit Mauritius. Available at: [URL] (accessed 31/03/25).
Le Juge de Segrais, X. (1976). Quarante zolies zistoires missié La fontaine. Port Louis: Mauritius Printing Cy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2019. Personal Communication. 16/06/19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 2008. Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Othello, Ludovic. 2020. Personal Communication. 25/11/20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer-Prieß, Barbara. 1999. Lateinische und romanische Periphrasen mit ‘haben’ und Infinitiv: zwischen ‘Obligation’, ‘Futur’ und ‘Vermutung’. In Jürgen Lang & Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen, 97–110. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, John Charles. 2006. How to do things without junk. The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance. In Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. II: Phonetics, Phonology and Dialectology. Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Austin, Texas, February 2005, 183–205. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Touchard, Yves & Daniel Véronique. 1993. À propos d’une enquête sur pu et va en mauricien. Etudes Creoles 16(1). 76–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 651. 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue