Review published In: Substrate Influence in Creole Formation
Edited by Bettina Migge and Norval Smith
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22:1] 2007
► pp. 170–176
Book review
. Defining creole. John McWhorter. Oxford University Press, 2005. 351 pp. Hardback. $49.00
Reviewed by
Published online: 6 April 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.16ans
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.16ans
References (17)
Ansaldo, U. (2004). The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix. In L. Lim (Ed.). Singapore English. A grammatical description (pp. 127–149). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(in preparation). A social and structural typology of contact languages. Cambridge University Press.
Ansaldo, U. and Matthews, S. J. (2001). Typical creoles and simple languages. The case of Simitic. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 311–326.
(eds.) (forthcoming). Deconstructing creole: Studies in language companion series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Arends, J. (2001). Social stratification and network relations in the formation of Sranan. In N. Smith and T. Veenstra (Eds.). Creolization and contact (pp. 291–307). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dahl, O. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 341, 533–591.
McWhorter, J. (1998). Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language, 741, 788–818.
Muysken, P. (1990). Are creoles a special type of language? In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Vol. II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications (pp. 285–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
