Cover not available

Review published In: Substrate Influence in Creole Formation
Edited by Bettina Migge and Norval Smith
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22:1] 2007
► pp. 170176

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (17)
References
Ansaldo, U. (2004). The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix. In L. Lim (Ed.). Singapore English. A grammatical description (pp. 127–149). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in preparation). A social and structural typology of contact languages. Cambridge University Press.
Ansaldo, U. and Matthews, S. J. (2001). Typical creoles and simple languages. The case of Simitic. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 311–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.) (forthcoming). Deconstructing creole: Studies in language companion series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Arends, J. (2001). Social stratification and network relations in the formation of Sranan. In N. Smith and T. Veenstra (Eds.). Creolization and contact (pp. 291–307). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 341, 533–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, D. (2001). Creoles, complexity and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (1998). Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language, 741, 788–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). The world’s simplest grammars are Creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (1990). Are creoles a special type of language? In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Vol. II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications (pp. 285–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2005). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language, 28.3, 641–644.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, E. G. (2005). Review of J. H. McWhorter 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford University Press. Linguist List, 161.1853.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue