Cover not available

Article published In: Australian Contact Languages
Edited by Carmel O'Shannessy, Denise Angelo and Jane Simpson
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 39:1] 2024
► pp. 187–218

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Event plurality and the verbal suffix ‑(a)bad in Australian Kriol

ORCiD logo with link | University of Western Australia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Western Australia
Published online: 14 December 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00126.bro
Abstract
The verbal suffix ‑(a)bad is a frequent form in Australian Kriol and is well attested across all described varieties of the language. Despite the prevalence of this suffix, its precise semantics have so far gone undescribed in the literature. In this article, we present a semantic analysis of this suffix, drawing on data from a variety of Kriol spoken in the north-east Kimberley region of Western Australia. We argue that the diverse set of readings associated with ‑(a)bad can be best unified under an analysis of this form as a marker of verbal plurality (i.e. pluractionality). The suffix derives a set of plural events from a modified verb stem, which then interacts with aspect and argument structure to produce a wide range of readings, particularly readings of temporal, participant, and spatial plurality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language background and methods
  • 3.The status of ‑(a)bad across northern Australia
    • 3.1-(a)bad in contact varieties beyond Kununurra
    • 3.2-(a)bad in Kununurra Kriol
  • 4.Background on verbal plurality
  • 5.The function of ‑(a)bad in Kununurra Kriol
    • 5.1Temporal plurality
    • 5.2Participant plurality
    • 5.3Spatial plurality
    • 5.4Evaluative functions
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1The pluractional core of -(a)bad
    • 6.2Relation to imperfectivity and the morpheme -in
    • 6.3Comparison to other pluractional markers
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations used in glosses follow the Leipzig glossing rules with the following exceptions
  • References
References (49)
References
Arregui, Ana, María Luisa Rivero, & Andrés Salanova. 2014. Cross-linguistic variation in imperfectivity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(2). 307–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-el, Leora. 2008. Verbal number and aspect in Skwxwú7mesh. Aspect et Pluralité d’Événements 371. 31–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Documenting and Classifying Aspectual Classes Across Languages. In Ryan Bochnak & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork, 75–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednall, James. 2021. Identifying salient Aktionsart properties in Anindilyakwa. Languages 61. 164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Alessandro Lenci. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In Robert Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Tense and Aspect, 853–880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochnak, Ryan & Lisa Matthewson. 2020. Techniques in complex semantic fieldwork. Annual Review of Linguistics 6(1). 261–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Connor & Maïa Ponsonnet. 2021. Constraints on subject elision in northern Australian Kriol: Between discourse and syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41(3). 287–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Budrikis, Amy. 2021. New speakers’ perspectives on reinstating the intergenerational transmission of endangered languages in Western Australia. Perth: University of Western Australia PhD thesis.
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Brenda Laca. 2012. Introduction. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal Plurality and Distributivity, 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caudal, Patrick, Robert Mailhammer and James Bednall. 2016. The Event Description Elicitation Database (EDED). Paris: University of Paris-Diderot, Sydney: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crane, Thera Marie & Bastian Persohn. 2019. What’s in a Bantu verb? Actionality in Bantu languages. Linguistic Typology 23(2). 303–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cusic, David. 1981. Verbal plurality and aspect. Stanford: Stanford University dissertation.
Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(5). 475–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Disbray, Samantha. 2008. More than one way to catch a frog: A study of children’s discourse in an Australian contact language. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD thesis.
Dixon, Sally. 2017. Alyawarr children’s variable present temporal reference expression in two, closely-related languages of Central Australia. Canberra: Australian National University PhD thesis.
Faller, Martina. 2012. Pluractionality and accompaniment in Cuzco Quechua. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal Plurality and Distributivity, 55–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2004. For -adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12(2). 135–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Atelicity, pluractionality, and adverbial quantification. In Henk Verkuyl, Henriëtte de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect, 107–124. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert. 2012. Ways of pluralizing events. Santa Cruz: University of California dissertation. [URL]
Hudson, Joyce. 1983. Transitivity and aspect in the Kriol verb. Papers in Pidgin and Creole Linguistics 31. 161–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Grammatical and Semantic Aspects of Fitzroy Valley Kriol. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín. 2011. Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. Vancouver: University of British Columbia PhD thesis.
Laca, Brenda. 2004. Romance “aspectual” periphrases: Eventuality modification versus “syntactic” aspect. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The Syntax of Time, 425–440. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 1995. Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Pluractionality: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 14(3). n/a. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog Where are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2008. Case-marking in contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol, an Australian mixed language. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD thesis.
. 2016. No fixed address: The grammaticalisation of the Gurindji locative as a progressive suffix. In Felicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (eds.), Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages since Colonisation, 367–396. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, Jennifer. 2000. Kriol on the move: A case of language spread and shift in Northern Australia. In Jeff Siegel (ed.), Processes of language contact: Studies from Australia and the South Pacific, 245–270. Montreal: Fides.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2012. Pluractional verbs: An overview. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal Plurality and Distributivity, 185–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olawsky, Knut J. 2010. Going public with language: involving the wider community in language revitalisation. In John Hobson, Kevin Lowe, Susan Poetsch, & Michael Walsh (eds.), Re-awakening Languages: Theory and Practice in the Revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous Languages, 80–90. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Shannessy, Carmel. 2005. Light Warlpiri: A new language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Shannessy, Carmel & Connor Brown. 2021. Reflexive and Reciprocal Encoding in the Australian Mixed Language, Light Warlpiri. Languages 61. 105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanchez-Mendes, Luciana & Ana Muller. 2007. The meaning of pluractionality in Karitiana. Proceedings of SULA 41. 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandefur, John. 1979. An Australian Creole in the Northern Territory: A Description of Ngukurr-Bamyili Dialects. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2012. Pluractional posing as progressive: A construction between lexical and grammatical aspect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32(1). 7–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Felicity Meakins, & Denise Angelo. 2013. Kriol. In Susanne Michaelis, Phillip Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Marcus Huber (eds.), The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 241–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharpe, Margaret. 1975. Notes on the ‘Pidgin English’ Creole of Roper River. In Margaret Sharpe, Lothar Jagst, & David Birk (eds.), Papers in Australian Linguistics, 1–20. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Bruce. 1980. On the historical emergence of race relations in the eastern Kimberley: Change? In Ronald Berndt & Catherine Berndt (eds.), Aborigines of the west: Their past and their present (2nd ed. rev.). Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Součková, Kateřina. 2011. Pluractionality in Hausa. Leiden: Leiden University PhD thesis.
Staden, Miriam van, Gunter Senft, Nick Enfield, & Jürgen Bohnemeyer. 2001. Staged events. In Nick Enfield & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Manual for the Field Season 2001, 115–125. Nijmegen: Max Plank Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steffensen, Margaret. 1980. Reduplication in Bamyili Creole. Pacific Linguistics 571. 119–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia. 2015. Evaluative morphology and aspect/actionality. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, 108–120. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia & Alain Kihm. 2008. Event internal pluractional verbs in some Romance languages. Aspect et Pluralité d’Événements 371. 9–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Esther. 2007. The semantic typology of pluractionality. Berkeley: University of California dissertation. [URL]
Yu, Alan. 2003. Pluractionality in Chechen. Natural Language Semantics 11(3). 289–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue