Article published In: Language Contact with Chinese:
Edited by Zhiming Bao
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 38:1] 2023
► pp. 41–61
Nominalization in Wutun
Published online: 5 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00103.san
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00103.san
Abstract
In this paper I discuss the various functions of nominalization in Wutun, a mixed Sinitic language spoken by ca.
4000 people in Qinghai Province, Northwest China. Nominalization in Wutun is expressed by the multi-purpose marker
-de (cognate to Standard Mandarin de 的), which functions on both the lexical and clausal levels. Lexical nominalization takes the
verb as its domain to derive nouns or adjectives, while clausal nominalization takes the entire clause as its domain and allows
the clause to be treated as a noun phrase. Clausal nominalization in Wutun is used to form nominal complement clauses, relative
clauses and adverbial subordinate clauses. In addition, the multi-purpose marker -de in Wutun has functions that
go beyond nominalization, including pronominal function, pre-nominal modification and stand-alone usage, which is related to
aspect and emphasis and plays an important role in stance-taking.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Lexical nominalization
- 3.Clausal nominalizations
- 3.1Nominal complement clauses
- 3.2Relative clauses
- 3.3Adverbial subordinate clauses
- 4.Other uses of the general-purpose morpheme -de
- 4.1Pronominal function
- 4.2Pre-modification
- 4.3Stand-alone usage
- 5.Summary and conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
- List of abbreviations
References
References (33)
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2015. Pidgins
and creoles. In Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics
Online, General Editor Rint Sybesma. (18 May,
2022.)
Bakker, Peter. 2003. Mixed
languages as autonomous systems. In Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds.), The
mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical
advances, 107–150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brosig, Benjamin, Foong Ha Yap & Karen Ahrens. 2019. Assertion,
presumption and presupposition: An account of the erstwhile nominalizer YUM in Khalkha
Mongolian. Studies in
Language 43(4). 896–940.
Chappell, Hilary. 2001. Language
contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal
diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative
linguistics, 328–357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Naixiong. 1982. Wutunhua Chutan 五屯话初探 [A preliminary investigation on Wutun
speech]. Minzu
Yuwen 11. 10–18. Beijing.
. 1986. Guanyu Wutunhua 关于五屯话 [An outline of Wutun linguistic
structure]. Journal of Asian and African
Studies 311. 33–52. Tokyo.
Chen, Naixiong & Chinggeltei. 1986. Baoanyu he Mengguyu 保安语和蒙古语 [The Bonan language and the Mongolian
language]. (Menggu Yuzu Yuyan Fangyan Yanjiu Congshu
010). Hohhot: Nei Menggu Renmin Chubanshe.
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Lexical
nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description, Vol III: Grammatical categories and the
lexicon, 349–396. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dede, Keith. 2015. Mixed
languages. In Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics
Online, General Editor Rint Sybesma. (18 May,
2022.)
Dixon, R. M. W. 2006. Complement
clauses and complementation strategies in typological
perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Complementation:
A cross-linguistic
typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DuBois, John. 2007. The
stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking
in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation,
interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.
Fried, Robert W. 2010. A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a
Mongolic language of Northwest China. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York dissertation.
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen. 2007. Evidentiality
and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 30(2). 151–194.
Hashimoto, Mantaro. 1976. Language
diffusion on the Asian continent: Problems of typological diversity in
Sino-Tibetan. Computational Analysis of Asian and African
Languages 31. 49–63.
Janhunen, Juha. 2007. Typological
interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia
Orientalia 1011. 85–103.
. 2012. On
the hierarchy of structural convergence in the Amdo
Sprachbund. In Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & P. Solovyev (eds.), Argument
structure and grammatical relations: A cross-linguistic
typology, 177–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.
Janhunen, Juha, Marja Peltomaa, Erika Sandman & Xiawu Dongzhou. 2008. Wutun. (Languages
of the World/Materials 466). Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Longacre, Robert E. 2007. Sentences as combinations of
clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description, second edition, Vol II: Complex
constructions, 372–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee-Smith, Mei W. & Stephen A. Wurm. 1996. The Wutun Language. In Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell R. Tryon (eds.) Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas. (Trends in Linguistics, Documentation 13, vol. II (2), 883–897. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu babai ci 现代汉语八百词. [800 Modern Chinese
words]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
Meakins, Felicity. 2013. Mixed
languages. In Peter Bakker & Yaron Matras (eds.), Contact
languages: A comprehensive guide. (Language Contact and Bilingualism
6), 159–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandman, Erika. 2016. A
Grammar of Wutun. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
. 2021. Wutun
as a mixed language. In Eeva Sippola & Maria Mazzoli (eds.) New
Perspectives on Mixed Languages. From Core to Fringe. (Language Contact and Bilingualism
18), 325–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandman, Erika & Camille Simon. 2016. Tibetan
as a ”model language” in the Amdo Sprachbund: evidence from Salar and Wutun. Journal of South
Asian Languages and Linguistics
(JSALL) 3(1). 85–122.
Sio, Joanna Ut-Seong. 2011. The Cantonese
ge3. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. (Typological Studies in Language
96), 125–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo & Stephen Matthews. 2018. Typological
variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative
approach. Linguistic
Typology 22(2). 233–275.
Tribur, Zoe. 2019. Verbal
morphology of Amdo Tibetan. Oregon: University of Oregon dissertation.
Wu, Hugjiltu. 2003. Bonan. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The
Mongolic languages. (Routledge Language Family Series
5), 325–345. London & New York: Routledge.
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona. 2011. Introduction:
Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. (Typological Studies in Language
96), 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.
