Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 37:1 (2022) ► pp.189–203

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Guest Column

Empiricism or imperialism

The science of Creole Exceptionalism

ORCiD logo with link | University of Queensland, Australia
Published online: 23 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Do Creoles constitute a separate typological class?
  • Are Creoles simpler than non-Creoles?
  • Concluding remarks
  • References
References (69)
References
Aboh, Enoch. 2016. Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 311.400–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch & Michel DeGraff. 2016. A null theory of Creole formation based on Universal Grammar. The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, ed. by I. Roberts, 401–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Dimensions of morphological complexity. Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity, ed. by M. Baerman, D. Brown & G. Corbett, 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2017. Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Language Sciences 601.26–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto & Stephen Matthews. 2007. Deconstructing creole: the rationale. Deconstructing Creole, ed. by U. Ansaldo, S. Matthews & L. Lim, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim (eds) 2007. Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett. 2015. What is morphological complexity? Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity, ed. by M. Baerman, D. Brown & G. Corbett, 3–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2014. Creolistics: Back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 291.177–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen & Eeva Sippola. 2017. Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 261.5–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 71.173–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasi, DamiÁn, Susanne Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath. 2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour (Letters) 11.723–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. Yearbook of Morphology 1995.1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2010. Fieldwork in language contact situations. The Handbook of Language Contact, ed. by R. Hickey, 340–57. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2009. Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to mixed languages. Language Contact and Contact Languages, ed. by P. Siemund & N. Kintama, 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric. 2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 451.274–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Creoles, Typology and Phylogenetics: Reconstructing Creole Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Kristoffer Friis Bøegh & Peter Bakker. 2017. West African languages and creoles worldwide. Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ed. by P. Bakker, F. Borchsenius, C. Levisen & E. Sippola, 141–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2001a. Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology’. Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by M. Kenstowicz, 53–121. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. On the origin of Creoles: A Cartesian critique of ‘neo’ Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 2/3.213–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Against Creole exceptionalism. Language 791.391–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society 341.533–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel, Robert Berwick & Trevor Bass. 2013. Modern phylogenetics and Creole evolution: Creole family values.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Angela Terrill, Ger Reesink, Robert A. Foley & Stephen C. Levinson. 2005. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 3091.2072–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Roland A. 1956. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2008. Borrowing of Inflectional Morphemes in Language Contact Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds) 2015. Borrowed Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2014. Sign languages, creoles, and the development of predication. Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. by F. Newmeyer & L. Preston. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie. 2005. The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, Julie, Colin Hughes & Robert Scotland. 1997. Primary homology assessment, characters and character states. Cladistics 121.275–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holm, John & Peter Patrick. 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars London: Battlebridge Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2003. Inflectional categories in creole languages. Phonology and Morphology of Creole Languages, ed. by I. Plag, 333–64. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Sylvia. 2010a. Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 1. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 251.173–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 2. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 251.359–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of grammar: The Case of Haitian Creole Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas. 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole. Zeitschrift fuer Dialektogie und Linguistik 21.169–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2001. Language Contact. Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mcwhorter, John. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological claim. Language 741.788–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 51.125–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. The Creole Debate Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2019. Morphology. Language Contact: An International Handbook, ed. by J. Darquennes, J. Salmons & W. Vandenbussche, 63–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Jennifer Green & Myfany Turpin. 2018. Understanding Linguistic Fieldwork London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, Xia Hua, Cassandra Algy & Lindell Bromham. 2019. The birth of a new language does not favour simplification. Language 951.294–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity & Sasha Wilmoth. 2020. Overabundance resulting from language contact: Complex cell-mates in Gurindji Kriol. The Complexities of Morphology, ed. by P. Arkadiev & F. Gardani, 81–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2008. Empirical problems with domain-based notions of “simple”. Social Lives in Language: Celebrating the Work of Gillian Sankoff, ed. by M. Meyerhoff & N. Nagy, 327–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Kaius SinnemÄki & Faius Karlsson (eds) 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1997. Kitúba. Contact Languages: A Wider Perspective, ed. by S. G. Thomason, 173–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages, ed. by I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. Schneider, 65–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1988. Are creoles are special type of language. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, ed. by F. Newmeyer, 285–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in cross-linguistic perspective. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, ed. by M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson, 265–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael, Peter Bakker & John Mcwhorter. 2018. Creoles and sociolinguistic complexity: Response to Ansaldo. Language Sciences 661.226–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003a. Introduction: The morphology of creole languages. Yearbook of Morphology 2002, ed. by G. Booij & J. van Marle, 1–2. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Yearbook of Morphology 2002 Great Britain: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger, Ruth Singer & Michael Dunn. 2009. Explaining the linguistic diversity of Sahul using population models. PLOS Biology 7.e1000241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah & Joan Bresnan. 2008. Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 121.269–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech New York: Harcourt Brace and company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2004. Morphological simplicity in Pidgins and Creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 191.139–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SkirgÅrd, Hedvig. 2020. Multilevel Dynamics of Language Diversity in Oceania. PhD Dissertation Canberra: Australian National University.
Taylor, Douglas. 1971. Grammatical and lexical affinities of Creoles. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, ed. by D. Hymes, 293–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology 51.371–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Sewall. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 161.97–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Bakker, Peter
2025. Empiricism against imperialism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 40:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Bisnath, Felicia, Hannah Lutzenberger, Marah Jaraisy, Rehana Omardeen & Adam Schembri
2025. Deconstructing notions of morphological ‘complexity’: Lessons from creoles and sign languages. Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rüter, Lara & Ingo Plag
2025. Measuring the similarity between languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo
Burgess, Danielle, Joy P. G. Peltier, Sophia Eakins, Wilkinson Daniel Wong Gonzales, Alicia Stevers, Ariana Bancu, Felicia Bisnath, Moira Saltzman & Marlyse Baptista
2024. The MULTI Project: Resources for Enhancing Multifaceted Creole Language Expertise in the Linguistics Classroom. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 99:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Hayden, Brian
2024. Selectional factors in pronominal system formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo
Kainz, Emma
2024. Is variation a sign of decreolization?. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo
Meakins, Felicity
2023. Quantifying the language dynamics of bilingual communities. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Meakins, Felicity
2023. What have we missed?. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 38:1 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue