Review published In: Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 34:1 (2019) ► pp.171–177
Book review
Contact languages: A comprehensive guide. Edited by Peter Bakker and Yaron Matras
Reviewed by
Published online: 22 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00035.mcw
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00035.mcw
References (15)
Aboh, Enoch & Michel DeGraff. 2017. A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar, 401–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In Silvia Kouwenberg & John Victor Singler (eds.), The handbook of pidgin and creole studies, 130–157. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 261. 5–42.
Bakker, Peter & Maarten Mous. 1994. Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
Bartens, Angela. 1996. Der Kreolische Raum: Geschichte und Gegenwart. Helsinki: Finnische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
DeGraff, Michel. 2001. On the origin of creoles: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5 (2/3). 213–310.
McWhorter, John H. 2012. Case closed? Testing the Feature Pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 271. 171–182.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2014. The case was never closed. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 291. 157–171.
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: typology, contact, change, 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 1997. Contact languages: A wider perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
