Article published In: Journal of Narrative and Life History
Vol. 2:3 (1992) ► pp.253–275
Peer Co-Narration: Changes in Structure of Preschoolers' Participation
Published online: 4 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.2.3.05pee
https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.2.3.05pee
Abstract
This article represents the interactional approach to the study of child narration. The analyses reveal the process of story creation by children in the roles of narrator and co-narrator. In building a narrative text alone (solo narration) or together with another child (co-narration), the child transmits new information to the peer listener about the adventures of storybook heroes. Nine hundred and sixty children ranging in age from 3 to 7 years took part in the investigation (384 in narrator and co-narrator roles and 576 in listener roles).
A modified version of Peterson and McCabe's (1983) method of narrative analysis was used. The results showed that co-constructed narratives underwent change with age in reference complexity (greater change than in solo constructed ones). Co-narrator contributions were analyzed in terms of (a) new reference content (introducing new reference situations), and (b) operations upon the partner's text (in various categories mainly confirmational and supplementary). The dominant partner in introducing new content was the initiator of the dis-course, whereas the dominant one in performing text operations was the con-tinuer. Changes across the age span were found in both types of co-narrator contribution. These results showed the changing structure of preschoolers' par-ticipation in co-narrative discourse. (Psycholinguistics)
References (22)
Bokus, B. (1979). Effect of adult-shared vs. nonshared perception of a picture on its description by the three-year-old. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 41, 239–243.
(1991a). Children's pragmatic knowledge of narrative tasks. In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics at issue: Selected papers from the 1987 International Pragmatics Conference, Part I (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bokus, B., & Shugar, G. W. (1979). What will a three-year-old child say? An experimental study of situational variation. In O. K. Garnica & M. L. King (Eds.), Language, children and society (pp. 249–269). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Bower, G. H. (1978). Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 11, 211–231.
Greenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic.
Keenan, E. O., & Klein, E. (1975). Coherency in children's discourse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 365–380.
Kemper, S. (1984). The development of narrative skills: Explanations and entertainments. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Discourse development: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 99–125). New York: Springer Verlag.
Kurcz, I. (1987). Język a reprezentacja świata w umyśle [Language and the mental representation of the world]. Warsaw: PWN.
Meng, K. (1987, July). Preschool children's narrative competence. Findings on the interaction between narrator and listener. Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Lund, Sweden.
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. E. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative. New York: Plenum.
Philips, S. U. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370–394). New York: Teachers College Press.
Preece, A. (1987). The range of narrative forms conversationally produced by young children. Journal of Child Language, 141, 353–373.
Shields, M. (1976, June). Some communicational skills of young children. A study of dialogue in the nursery school. Paper presented at the Psychology of Language Conference, Stirling, Scotland.
Shugar, G. W. (1978). Text analysis as an approach to the study of early linguistic operations. In N. Waterson & C. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 227–251). Chichester, England: Wiley.
(1988). The nature of peer discourse: Participant structures for and by children. In R. Söderbergh (Ed.), Children's creative communication (pp. 56–81). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Shugar, G. W., Bokus, B., & Kmita, G. (1988) The pragmatics of collaboration: Participant structure and the structure of participation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Psychology.
Shugar, G. W., & Kmita, G. (1990) The pragmatics of collaboration: Participant structure and the structures of participation. In G. Conti-Ramsden & C. Snow (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 7, pp. 273–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Snow, C., & Goldfield, B. A. (1982). Building stories: The emergence of information structures from conversation. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 127–141). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Xing, Lei, Yi Tang, Qingke Liu, Haifeng Chen, Jiamin Zeng & Junyue Su
Bokus, Barbara
2022. Inter-mind phenomena in child narrative discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 391 ff.
Quasthoff, Uta & Juliane Stude
Bartczak, Marlena, Ewa Haman & Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak
Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna, Nicole Rossmanith, Iris Nomikou & Katharina J. Rohlfing
Smogorzewska, Joanna
Şen, Hilal H. & Aylin C. Küntay
McCabe, Allyssa, Judith Boccia, Mary Beth Bennett, Natallia Lyman & Ryan Hagen
Cassell, Justine
Bower, Anne R.
1997. The Role of Narrative in the Study of Language and Aging. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7:1-4 ► pp. 265 ff.
Pesco, Diane & Martha Crago
1996. "We Went Home, Told the Whole Story to Our Friends": Narratives by Children in an Algonquin Community. Journal of Narrative and Life History 6:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
