Article published In: Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.262–291
Building a body of followers
Neoliberalism and online discourse of fitness and masculinity
Published online: 16 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.2.03hir
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.2.03hir
Abstract
In 2014, a British journalist coined the term spornosexual to account for the emergence of a body-obsessed version of metrosexuality. While metrosexuals practice beautification rituals, spornosexuals are men obsessed with developing muscular bodies and self-objectifyingly flaunting them online. In an age of neoliberalism and globalization, this form of masculinity has now spread worldwide, including to Singapore, as a hegemonic ideal male figure. Using a multimodal analysis, we investigate four racially Chinese, Singapore-based Instagram users who represent prototypical spornosexual ideals through their bodies and fitness practices. We examine the way these Instagram users embody the personhood of a spornosexual through their construction of mediatized identities online. The meanings and values associated with the muscular body are also explored and subsequently compared with traditional notions of masculinity in Singapore.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Male objectification
- 2.Singapore: From rugged individualism to neoliberal enterprise
- 3.Theoretical background
- 3.1Figures of personhood
- 3.2Mediation and mediatization
- 4.Data
- 5.Sexuality and attachedness
- 6.Analysis
- 6.1Visual analysis
- 6.1.1Male objectification and Goffman’s gender displays
- 6.1.2Degree of self-eroticization
- 6.2Text analysis
- 6.2.1Corpus analysis
- 6.2.2Critical discourse analysis
- 6.1Visual analysis
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (53)
Agha, Asif. 2011a. Large and small scale forms of personhood. Language & Communication 31(3): 171–180.
Anthony, Lawrence. 2015. AntConc 3.5.0. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]> (January 10, 2016)
Bangeles, De Mar M., Serentas, Warlito S., Tik-Ing, Lezlie Jean A. & Tarusan, Mary Ann E. 2015. Spornosexual: A case study. Psychology 6(9): 1067–1076.
Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris. 2000. Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 29(1): 447–466.
Boyd, Danah M. & Ellison, Nicole B. 2008. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210–230.
Cafri, Guy & Thomson, J. Kevin. 2004. Measuring male body image: A review of the current methodology. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5(1): 18–29.
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, John Edward. 2004. Getting It On Online: Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality and Embodied Identity. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
Connell, Raewyn & Messerschmidt, James. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19(6): 829–859.
Daniel, Samantha & Bridges, Sara K. 2010. The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objectification theory. Body Image 7(1): 32–38.
De Costa, Peter. 2014. Reconceptualizing cosmopolitanism in language and literacy education: Insights from a Singapore school. Research in the Teaching of English 49(1): 9–30.
Department of Statistics Singapore. 2016. Singapore in figures 2016. Statistics Singapore. <[URL]> (November 19, 2016)
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2013. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fracher, Jeffrey & Kimmel, Michael. 1995. Hard issues and soft spots: Counseling men about sexuality. In Men’s Lives, Michael Kimmel & Michael Messner (eds), 365–374. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Freberg, Karen, Graham, Kristin, McGaughey, Karen & Freberg, Laura A. 2011. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review 37(1): 90–92.
Fredrickson, Barbara L. & Roberts, Tomi-Ann. 1997. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21(2): 173–206.
Gill, Rosalind, Henwood, Karen & McLean, Carl. 2005. Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body and Society 11(1): 37–62.
Hakim, Jamie. 2015. Fit is the new rich: Male embodiment in the age of austerity. Soundings 611: 84–94.
Hiramoto, Mie & Teo, Shi Ling Cherise. 2015. Heteronormative love makes a house a home: Multimodal analysis of luxury housing ads in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(2): 223–253.
Hudson, Chris. 2011. From rugged individual to dishy dad: Reinventing masculinity in Singapore. Genders 541. <[URL]> (February 10, 2016)
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2011. Sociolinguistic diversity in mainstream media: Authenticity, authority and processes of mediation and mediatization. Journal of Language and Politics 10(4): 562–586.
Kang, Mee-Eun. 1997. The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles 37(11–12): 979–996.
Katz, Jackson. 1999. Tough Guise: Violence, Media and the Crisis in Masculinity [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
. 2006. Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
Kaur, Gurveen. 2015. The rise of the spornosexual, the more hardcore, body-obsessed version of metrosexuals. <[URL]> (December 13, 2015)
Keith, Thomas. 2008. Generation M: Misogyny in Media and Culture [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
Khoo, Michele & Karan, Kavita. 2007. Macho or metrosexual: The branding of masculinity in FHM magazine in Singapore. Intercultural Communication Studies 16(1): 34–45.
Kilbourne, Jean. 2010. Killing Us Softly 4: Advertising’s Image of Women [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
Krotz, Friedrich. 2009. Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, Knut Lundby (ed), 21–40. New York: Peter Lang.
Lawler, Steph. 2011. Symbolic capital. In Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, Dale Southerton (ed), 1418–1420. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leap, William. 2003. Language and gendered modernity. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 401–422. Oxford: Blackwell.
Louie, Kam. 2003. Chinese, Japanese and global masculine identities. In Asian Masculinities: The Meaning and Practice of Manhood in China and Japan, Kam Louie & Morris Low (eds), 1–15. New York: Routledge.
Louie, Kam & Edwards, Louise. 1994. Chinese masculinity: Theorizing wen and wu
. East Asian History 81: 135–148.
Marwick, Alice E. & Boyd, Danah. 2010. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship. The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Palmer, Lena. 2015. ‘Poppin’ bottles, getting wheysted.’ Exploring young men’s engagement with fitspiration content and its consequential influences on attitudes and behavior. Journal of Promotional Communications 3(3): 425–445.
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul. 2014. Cartographies of language: Making sense of mobility among Korean transmigrants in Singapore. Language & Communication 391: 83–91.
Rohlinger, Deana A. 2002. Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles 46(3): 61–74.
Simpson, Mark. 2014. The metrosexual is dead. Long live the “spornosexual.” <[URL]> (December 26, 2015)
Singapore Government. 2008. Penal Code Cap. 224, Rev. Ed. Outrages on Decency: 377A. November 30. <[URL]> (August 20, 2016)
Tan, Yue, Shaw, Ping, Cheng, Hong & Kim, Kwangmi Ko. 2013. The construction of masculinity: A cross-cultural analysis of men’s lifestyle magazine advertisements. Sex Roles 691: 237–249.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Vrijsen, Elina, Alexander Dhoest, Sofie Van Bauwel & Charlotte De Backer
Wu, Jasper Zhao Zhen, Mie Hiramoto & Andre Joseph Theng
Pak, Vincent & Mie Hiramoto
Bouvier, Gwen & Ariel Chen
Hall, Kira, Rodrigo Borba & Mie Hiramoto
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
