Article published In: Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 5:1 (2016) ► pp.94–112
Expressing pleasure and avoiding engagement in online adult video comment sections
Published online: 11 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.5.1.04pih
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.5.1.04pih
Online video pornography websites have grown into a key online industry and location for pornography consumption. While much work has been done investigating reception of online video generally, discourse analysis of comments and interaction around online pornography remains rare. This article focuses on comments on adult videos, comparing and contrasting the comments on adult videos with other online video sites. The goal is to identify and explain differences and similarities in the content of comments and interaction. The article therefore analyses 22,562 comments taken from the 100 most-viewed videos on the popular porn-hosting website, Pornhub. In contrast to studies of non-pornographic online video pages, analysis shows little interaction among users in comments sections and that offense is largely absent. Building on this analysis, I then discuss why offense does not arise in the comments. Findings suggest that the location of the comments at the point of pornography consumption affects the comment content, resulting in a discourse of solitary pleasure and fantasy rather than community engagement.
References (37)
Angouri, Jo & Tseliga, Theodora. 2010. ‘You have no idea what you are talking about!’ From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 6(1): 57–82.
Arundale, Robert. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2(2): 193–216.
Bou-Franch, Patricia & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2014. Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36.
Burgess, Jean & Green, Joshua. 2008. Agency and controversy in the YouTube community. Paper presented at Internet Research 9.0: Rethinking Community, Rethinking Place, Copenhagen, 15–18 October 2008.
Frobish, Todd. 2004. Sexual profiteering and rhetorical assuagement: Examining ethos and identity at Playboy.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(3). <[URL]> (November 18, 2015)
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1–33.
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6(2): 215–242.
Hennick, Calvin. 2014. Why porn fans are the last decent people on the internet. The Culture Blog. <[URL]> (April 22, 2014)
Herring, Susan & Stoerger, Sharon. 2014. Gender and (a)nonymity in computer-mediated communication. In The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 567–586. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Lange, Patricia. 2007a. Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, Florida.
. 2007b. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 361–380.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leap, William. 2011. Language, gay pornography, and audience reception. Journal of Homosexuality 58(6–7): 932–952.
. 2014. The sex machine, the full-body tattoo, and the hermaphrodite: Gay sexual cinema, audience reception and fractal recursivity. In Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Lal Zimman, Jenny Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), 129–149. New York: Oxford University Press.
Locher, Miriam & Watts, Richard. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1): 9–33.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2011. On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–2593.
Milani, Tommaso. 2013. Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society 24(5): 615–633.
Mills, Sara. 2011. Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds), 21–56. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Moor, Peter, Heuvelman, Ard & Verleur, Ria. 2010. Flaming on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1536–1546.
Planchenault, Gaëlle. 2010. Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 6(1): 83–103.
Pornhub. 2014. Year in review. Porhub. <[URL]> (June 24, 2015)
Pornhub. n.d. Terms & conditions. Pornhub. <[URL]> (August 14, 2014)
Rogala, Christina & Tydén, Tanja. 2003. Does pornography influence young women’s sexual behavior? Women’s Health Issues 13(1): 39–43.
Sabina, Chiara, Wolak, Janis & Finkelhor, David. 2008. The nature and dynamics of internet pornography exposure for youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11(6): 691–693.
van Zoonen, Liesbet, Vis, Farida & Mihelj, Sabina. 2010. Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 249–262.
. 2011. YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media & Society 13(8): 1283–1300.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Watson, Brian M.
Sifianou, Maria
Pihlaja, Stephen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
