Cover not available

Article published In: Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space
Edited by Mie Hiramoto
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2] 2015
► pp. 254–271

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The subversive potential of queer pornography

A systemic-functional analysis of a written online text

 | Lancaster University, United Kingdom
Published online: 18 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol
This paper addresses the question of what potential queer pornography has to subvert hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality. In particular, it engages in the analysis of transitivity and metaphor in an example of queer written online pornography and links this textual analysis to a discussion of the role of text distribution and consumption in realising any subversive potential. The analysis shows that in terms of participant representation, the text reinforces rather than challenges hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality: Although the main protagonists are both ambiguously sexed, patterns of transitivity and use of metaphor construct largely binary gender identities for them, allocating sexual activity to the first-person narrator while casting the Other as passively desiring. In terms of its distribution and consumption, however, the text maintains its subversive potential as it sexualises a public online space and can turn offline public space into a sexual place.
References (37)
Adams-Thies, Brian. 2012. Fluid bodies or bodily fluids: Bodily reconfigurations in cybersex. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11: 179–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attwood, Feona & Smith, Clarissa. 2014. Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies 11: 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2004. Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 321: 346–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 2002. Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, David & Valentine, Gill. 1995. Introduction: Orientations. In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, David Bell & Gill Valentine (eds), 1–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2004. Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 331: 469–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1989. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenn, John D. 1981. Gay fantasies in gay publications. In Gayspeak: Gay Male and Lesbian Communication, James W. Chesebro (ed), 104–113. New York: The Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Adam I., Follert, Mike, Osterlund, Kathy & Paquin, Jamie. 2010. Space, place and sexual sociality: Towards an ‘atmospheric analysis’. Gender, Work and Organization 17: 7-27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heywood, John. 1997. ‘The object of desire is the object of contempt’: Representations of masculinity in Straight to Hell magazine. In Language and Masculinity, Sally Johnson & Ulrike H. Meinhof (eds), 188–207. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holbrook, David (ed). 1972. The Case Against Pornography. London: Tom Stacey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, Gordon B., Bouthillette, Anne-Marie & Retter, Yolanda (eds). 1997. Queers in Space: Communities, Public Places, Sites of Resistance. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 2008. Technology, democracy and participation in space. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, Ruth Wodak & Veronika Koller (eds), 429–446. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott. 2002. Playing the straight man: Displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 249–266. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Brian W. 2011. Language, sexuality and place: The view from cyberspace. Gender and Language 51: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Location, lore and language: An erotic triangle. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11: 106–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics 81: 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. No ordinary boy: Language, masculinities and queer pornography. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 156–173. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leap, William L. 2011. Language, gay pornography, and audience reception. Journal of Homosexuality 581: 932–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lischinsky, Alon. 2015. Doing the naughty or having it done to you: Agent roles in erotic writing. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics 2015 conference, Lancaster/UK, 20–24 July. <[URL]> (August 13, 2015)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, Julia. 2012. Anti-Porn: The Resurgence of Anti-Pornography Feminism. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKee, Alan. 2014. Humanities and social scientific research methods in porn studies. Porn Studies 11: 53–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNair, Brian. 2002. Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen. 2011. Discourse and identity in a corpus of lesbian erotica. Journal of Lesbian Studies 151: 122–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paasonen, Susanna. 2007. Epilogue: Porn futures. In Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture, Susanna Paasonen, Kaarina Nikunen & Laura Saarenmaa (eds), 161–170. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paasonen, Susanna, Nikunen, Kaarina & Saarenmaa, Laura (eds). 2007. Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pendleton, David. 1992. Obscene allegories: Narrative, representation, pornography. Discourse 151: 154–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryberg, Ingrid. 2012. Imagining safe space: The politics of Queer, Feminist and Lesbian pornography. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University. <[URL]> (August 13, 2015)
Tibbals, C. Anne. 2014. Gonzo, trannys, and teens: Current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies 11: 127–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–71. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann & Walton, Marsha. 1999. The metaphorical construction of sexual experience in a speech community of New Zealand university students. British Journal of Social Psychology 381: 479–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Linda. 2004. Porn studies: Proliferating pornographies on/scene: An introduction. In Porn Studies, Linda Williams (ed), 1–23. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2023. Provocative euphemism in pornographic film titles. Journal of Language and Sexuality 12:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Sanz-Valdivieso, Lucía
2023. Give it to her. Journal of Language and Sexuality 12:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Koller, Veronika
2022. Words and Worlds of Desire: The Power of Metaphor in Framing Sexuality. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Ting-Fai
2022. Queer Sinophone Malaysia: Language, Transnational Activism, and the Role of Taiwan. Journal of Intercultural Studies 43:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Seehuus, Martin, Ariel B. Handy & Amelia M. Stanton
2021. Change in the Popularity of Transgressive Content in Written Erotica between 2000 and 2016. The Journal of Sex Research 58:3 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Lischinsky, Alon
2018. Doing the naughty or having it done to you? Agent roles in erotic writing. Porn Studies 5:2 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue