Article published In: Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space
Edited by Mie Hiramoto
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2] 2015
► pp. 193–222
Demeanor indexicals, interpretive discourses and the “Kong Girl” stereotype
Constructing gender ideologies in social media
Published online: 18 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.02che
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.02che
Focusing on a Hong Kong online discussion involving ‘Jenny’, who was later described as the ‘Kong Girl’ prototype, we demonstrate a method to study gender stereotype as both semiotically and discursively constructed. We trace the perceivable signs in online posts as demeanor indexicals (Goffman 1956, Agha 2007), and discuss how forum participants collectively develop Jenny’s public persona as a woman who is materialistic and has an entitlement attitude, qualities that later become emblematic of the Kong Girl stereotype. Our analysis proposes a framework for how interpretive discourses mediate between the situated social media context and gender ideologies, and contributes to an understanding of the role of demeanor indexicals in the construction of a stereotype that is not associated with a linguistic register. We provide insights into local gender dynamics and illustrate how a private dispute becomes entangled in a public consensus building process that is necessarily selective, emergent, and positioned.
References (41)
Agha, Asif. 1998. Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society 271: 151–193.
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203–223.
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4-5): 585–614.
Cameron, Deborah. 2005. Language, gender and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics 26(4): 482–502.
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
Edley, Nigel. 2001. Analysing masculinity, interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourses as Data – A Guide for Analysis, Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor & Simeon J. Yates (eds), 189–228. London: Sage.
Gilbert, Nigel & Mulkay, Michael. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58(3): 473–502.
Haviland, John B. 2005. ‘Whorish old man’ and ‘one (animal) gentleman’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 81–94.
Herring, Susan. 2003. Gender and power in on-line communication. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 202–228. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Inoue, Miyako. 2004. What does language remember? Indexical inversion and the naturalized history of Japanese women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1): 39–56.
Kang, M. Agnes & Chen, Katherine. 2014. Stancetaking and the Hong Kong Girl in a shifting heterosexual marketplace. Discourse & Society 25(2): 205–220.
Luke, Kang Kwong. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Macrae, C. Neil, Stangor, Charles & Hewstone, Miles (eds). 1996. Stereotypes and Stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.
McGarty, Craig, Yzerbyt, Vincent & Spears, Russell (eds). 2002. Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Laura. 2004. You are doing burikko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese. In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, Shigeko Okamoto & Janet S. Shibamoto Smith (eds), 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2007. Those naughty teenage girls: Japanese Kogals, slang, and media assessments. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 225–247.
Pateman, Carol. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. [1902]/1955. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed), 98–119. New York: Dover Publications.
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
Silverstein, Michael. 1992. The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2(3): 311–323.
. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, John A. Lucy (ed), 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
. 1998. Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 271: 401–426.
. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3): 193–229.
Stangor, Charles (ed). 2000. Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Sutton, Laurel A. 1995. Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 279–296. New York: Routledge.
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33(1): 1–39.
TVB. 2009. 星期日檔案: 港男.講女 播出日期: 2009.03.08 (日) [“TVB (2009) Sunday Report: Kong Men talk about women. Broadcast 2009.03.08 (Sunday)”].
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Chew, Matthew Ming-tak
Hsu, Chan-Chia
Tsang, Alfred, Tong King Lee & Wei Li
Peng, Chun-Yi
Peng, Chun-Yi
Peng, Chun-Yi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
