Article published In: Nonbinary pronouns as a site of advocacy in research and teaching
Edited by Lex Konnelly, Bronwyn M. Bjorkman and Lee Airton
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:2] 2022
► pp. 165–189
Language ideologies and legitimacy among nonbinary YouTubers
Published online: 4 August 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20021.cro
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20021.cro
Abstract
This paper explores how ten nonbinary North American YouTubers appeal to legitimizing discourses
(van Leeuwen, Theo & Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing
immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse
Studies 1(1): 83–118. ) as rationalizations for their choices regarding
identity labels and pronouns. Given the local cultural salience of the implications of their language choices, the YouTubers
rationalize their terminological choices through legitimizing discourses that prioritize historical facts, lexical
definitions, and personal feelings. I examine how these discourses presuppose particular
language ideologies, or implicit assumptions about what language users view as “appropriate” language practices. In the
case of the nonbinary YouTubers, I illustrate that the vloggers’ legitimizing discourses appeal to and juxtapose a referentialist
ideology ( 2008. The Everyday Language of White
Racism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. , Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language
structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on
Linguistic Units and Levels, Paul Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds), 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.),
according to which words should describe the world truthfully, and an ideology of self-identification (. 2019. Trans
self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic
discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language 2561: 147–175. ), which prioritizes individual agency. Crucially, deploying these legitimizing discourses is
an important strategy that nonbinary YouTubers draw on as part of their advocacy and education projects.
Keywords: nonbinary, transgender, language ideology, legitimization, YouTube, discourse analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Linguistic activism and gender
- 3.Language and legitimacy
- 4.Language ideologies and semiotic ideologies
- 5.Nonbinary communities and YouTube
- 6.Methods
- 7.Legitimizing discourses
- 7.1Discourse of historical fact
- 7.2Discourse of lexical definition
- 7.3Discourse of personal feeling
- 7.4Feelings about definitions
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (45)
Borba, Rodrigo. 2019. The
interactional making of a “true transsexual”: Language and (dis)identification in trans-specific
healthcare. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language 2561: 21–55.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991
[1982]. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity
and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse
Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.
Chun, Elaine W. 2016. The meaning of Ching-Chong:
Language, racism, and response in new media. In Raciolinguistics: How
Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race, H. Samy Alim, John R. Rickford & Arnetha F. Ball (eds), 81–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chun, Elaine & Walters, Keith. 2011. Orienting
to Arab orientalisms: Language, race, and humor in a YouTube
video. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds), Digital
Discourse: Language in the New
Media, 251–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crowley, Archie & Chun, Elaine. 2021. Online
research and new media. In Research Methods in Linguistic
Anthropology, Sabina M. Perrino & Sonya E. Pritzker (eds), 297–329. London: Bloomsbury.
Dame, Avery. 2013. “I’m
your hero? Like me?”: The role of ‘expert’ in the trans male vlog. Journal of Language and
Sexuality 2(1): 40–69.
Ehrlich, Susan & King, Ruth. 1992. Gender-based
language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse &
Society 3(2): 151–166.
. 1994. Feminist
meanings and the (de)politicization of the lexicon. Language in
Society 23(1): 59–76.
Garrison, Spencer. 2018. On
the limits of “trans enough”: Authenticating trans identity narratives. Gender &
Society 32(5): 613–637.
Hill, Jane H. 1998. Language, race, and white public
space. American
Anthropologist 100(3): 680–689.
Irvine, Judith. 1989. When
talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American
Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267.
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2008. Discourses
of endangerment: Contexts and consequences of essentializing
discourses. In Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in
the Defence of Languages, Alexandre Duchêne & Monica Heller (eds), 57–75. London: Bloomsbury.
Johnson, Austin H. 2015. Normative accountability: How
the medical model influences transgender identities and experiences. Sociology
Compass 9(9): 803–813.
Jones, Lucy. 2019. Discourses
of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction. International Journal of the Sociology
of
Language 2019(256): 85–101.
Konnelly, Lex. 2018. “I’m
just making an update video”: Monologic inter-subjectivity and the stylistic use of creaky voice in non-binary transition
vlogs. (Paper presented at the 25th Lavender Languages and
Linguistics Conference, Providence RI)
Kroskrity, Paul. 2004. Language
ideologies. In A Companion to Linguistic
Anthropology, Alessandro Duranti (ed), 496–517. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Lovelock, Michael. 2019. ‘My
coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal
of Cultural
Studies 22(1): 70–85.
Mallinson, Christine. 2017. Language
and its everyday revolutionary potential. In The Oxford Handbook of
U.S. Women’s Social Movement
Activism (Vol. 11), Holly J. McCammon, Verta Taylor, Jo Reger & Rachel L. Einwohner (eds), 419–439. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. What’s
in a name? Social labeling and gender practices. In The Handbook of
Language and Gender, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 69–97. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
McLemore, Kevin A. 2015. Experiences with misgendering:
Identity misclassification of transgender spectrum individuals. Self and
Identity 14(1): 51–74.
Miller, Jordan Forrest. 2017. “I Wanna Know Where the Rule Book
Is”: YouTube as a Site of Counternarratives to Transnormativity. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Milroy, James. 2001. Language
ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555.
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1999. Authority
in Language: Investigating Standard
English. London: Psychology Press.
Nicolazzo, Z. 2016. ‘It’s
a hard line to walk’: Black non-binary trans* collegians’ perspectives on passing, realness, and
trans*-normativity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in
Education 29(9): 1173–1188.
Pauwels, Anne. 2003. Linguistic
sexism and feminist linguistic activism. In The Handbook of Language
and Gender, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 550–570. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Raun, Tobias. 2016. Out
Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on YouTube. Milton Park: Routledge.
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. Strategies
of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse &
Society 22(6): 781–807.
Rumsey, Alan. 1990. Wording,
meaning, and linguistic ideology. American
Anthropologist 92(2): 346–361.
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language
structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on
Linguistic Units and Levels, Paul Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds), 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Legitimation
in discourse and communication. Discourse &
Communication 1(1): 91–112.
van Leeuwen, Theo & Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing
immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse
Studies 1(1): 83–118.
Vipond, Evan. 2015. Resisting
transnormativity: Challenging the medicalization and regulation of trans bodies. Theory in
Action 8(2): 21–44.
Woolard, Kathryn. A. 1985. Language variation and cultural
hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American
Ethnologist 12(4): 738–748.
Woolard, Kathryn. A. & Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1994. Language
ideology. Annual Review of
Anthropology 231: 55–82.
Zimman, Lal. 2012. Voices
in Transition: Testosterone, Transmasculinity, and the Gendered Voice among Female-to-Male Transgender People. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
. 2017a. Trans
people’s linguistic self-determination and the dialogic nature of
identity. In Representing Trans: Linguistic, Legal and Everyday
Perspectives, Evan Hazenberg & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 226–248. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
. 2017b. Transgender
language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive
language. Journal of Language and
Discrimination 1(1): 83–104.
. 2019. Trans
self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic
discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language 2561: 147–175.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 2007. Why are we so
Illuded? [URL] (April 11,
2022).
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Blanco-Fernández, Vítor
Lookingbill, Valerie & Travis L. Wagner
Wagner, Travis L.
Zimman, Lal
Bruns, Hanna
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
