Article published In: Pink Dot: Discursive Formations, Constructions, and Contestations
Edited by Adi Saleem Bharat, Pavan Mano and Robert Phillips
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:2] 2021
► pp. 129–156
Disarming as a tactic of resistance in Pink Dot
Published online: 16 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20008.man
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20008.man
Abstract
Pink Dot is an annual rally in support of LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) people in Singapore. In a country
where many prefer to avoid overt displays of dissent, Pink Dot has gained significant popular support. In this article, I explore how it has
done so. Through a close multimodal analysis focusing on the use of colour, layout, and typography in a Pink Dot 2017 flyer, I demonstrate
how these features work together in the Singaporean context to realize meanings of positivity, warmth, and inclusivity whilst simultaneously
de-emphasizing notions of claiming rights. I argue Pink Dot discursively attenuates the potentially discordant elements of its message and
marshals this apparent neutrality to gather support for its ostensibly depoliticized message – a process that I term disarming. It is an
assimilationist strategy deliberately made for Singapore’s particular sociopolitical context and it has proven effective in securing mass
popular support amongst Singaporeans.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Singapore, Speakers’ Corner, and Pink Dot
- 1.2Pink Dot and resistance through assimilation
- 2.Theoretical approach: Undertaking a multimodal analysis
- 2.1Multimodality: A brief background
- 2.2Analytical framework
- 3.A multimodal analysis of a Pink Dot 2017 flyer
- 3.1Semiotics of colour
- 3.1.1Value
- 3.1.2Saturation
- 3.1.3Purity
- 3.1.4Modulation
- 3.1.5Differentiation
- 3.1.6Hue
- 3.2Semiotics of typography
- 3.2.1Weight
- 3.2.2Expansion
- 3.2.3Slope
- 3.2.4Curvature
- 3.2.5Connectivity
- 3.2.6Orientation
- 3.2.7Regularity
- 3.3Layout and information structure
- 3.1Semiotics of colour
- 4.Contextualizing Pink Dot’s discursive attenuation
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (65)
Abousnnouga, Gill & Machin, David. 2013. The Language of War Monuments, Visual Discourses of War: A Multimodal Approach. London: Bloomsbury.
Adam, Barry D., Duyvendak, Jan Willem & Krouwel, André (eds). 1999. The Global Emergence of Gay and Lesbian Politics: National Imprints of a Worldwide Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bateman, John. 2011. The decomposability of semiotic modes. In Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains, Kay O’Halloran & Bradley Smith (eds), 17–38. London: Routledge.
Bell, David & Gill, Valentine. 1995. Introduction: Orientations. In Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, David Bell & Gill Valentine (eds), 1–27. London: Routledge.
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 1976. The cultural logic of Singapore’s ‘multiracialism’. In Singapore: Society in Transition, Riaz Hassan (ed), 115–133. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bob, Clifford (ed). 2009. The International Struggle for New Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Borsuk, Richard & Chua, Reginald. 1998. Singapore strains relations with Indonesia’s president. The Wall Street Journal, August 4.
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chong, Jean. 2019. LGBTQ activism in Singapore. In A History of Human Rights Society in Singapore: 1965–2015, Jiyoung Song (ed), 150–168. New York: Routledge.
Chua, Beng Huat. 2003. Multiculturalism: An instrument of social control. Race & Class 44(3): 58–77.
. 2005. Taking Group Rights Seriously: Multiracialism in Singapore. Murdoch, WA: Murdoch University, Asia Research Centre.
Chua, Lynette J. 2012. Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore: Pragmatic resistance. Law & Society Review 46(4): 713–748.
2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.
2017. Collective litigation and the constitutional challenges to decriminalizing homosexuality in Singapore. Journal of Law and Society 44(3): 433–455.
CNA. 2017. Only Singaporeans, PRs Allowed to Attend Pink Dot 2017: Organisers. CNA. Retrieved 16 March 2020 ([URL]).
Currier, Ashley. 2009. Deferral of legal tactics: A global LGBT social movement organization’s perspective. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, Scott Barclay, Mary Bernstein, & Anna-Maria Marshall (eds), 21–37. New York: New York University Press.
Duggan, Lisa. 2003. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Fernandez, Luis A. 2008. Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti-Globalization Movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
George, Cherian. 2007. Consolidating authoritarian rule: Calibrated coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review 20(2): 127–145.
Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hildebrandt, Timothy. 2013. Social Organizations and the Authoritarian State in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hor, Michael. 2012. Enforcement of 377A: Entering the Twilight Zone. In Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures, Audrey Yue & Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 45–58. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Koller, Veronika. 2008. ‘Not just a colour’: Pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual Communication 7(4): 395–423.
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2002. Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication 1(3): 343–368.
Lazar, Michelle M. 2017. Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3): 420–441.
Lee, Hsien Loong. 2007. Speech to Parliament on Reading of Penal Code (Amendment) Bill. Singapore: Hansard.
Machin, David. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 347–355.
Merry, Sally E. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mutalib, Hussin. 2000. Illiberal democracy and the future of opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly 21(2): 313–342.
Ng, Yi-Sheng. 2017. Pride versus prudence: The precarious queer politics of Pink Dot. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 18(2): 238–250.
Ong, Justin. 2017. Singapore to Block Foreigners from Promoting Political Causes Locally. CNA. Retrieved from [URL] (16 March 2020).
Oswin, Natalie. 2014. Queer time in global city Singapore: Neoliberal futures and the ‘freedom to love’. Sexualities 17(4): 412–433.
Phillips, Robert. 2013. ‘We aren’t really that different’: Globe-hopping discourse and queer rights in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 122–144.
. 2020. Virtual Activism: Sexuality, the Internet, and a Social Movement in Singapore. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Pink Dot SG. 2017a. Announcement on Speakers Corner Restrictions for Pink Dot SG 2017. Retrieved from [URL] (16 March 2020).
. 2017b. Pink Dot 2017. Retrieved from [URL] (30 April 2019).
. 2019. About. Retrieved from [URL] (October 2019).
Radics, George. 2015. Section 377A in Singapore and the (de)criminalization of homosexuality. Reconstructions 15(2): 1–29.
. 2019. ‘First world problems’ in the ‘third world’? LGBT rights in Singapore. In Criminal Legalities in the Global South: Cultural Dynamics, Political Tensions, and Institutional Practices, Pablo Ciocchini & George Radics (eds), 32–51. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ramdas, Kamalini. 2013. Contesting landscapes of familyhood: Singlehood, the AWARE Saga and the Pink Dot celebrations. In Changing Landscapes of Singapore: Old Tensions, New Discoveries, Elaine Lynn-Ee Ho, Chih Yuan Woon & Kamalini Ramdas (eds), 109–125. Singapore: NUS Press.
Rodan, Garry. 2003. Embracing electronic media but suppressing civil society: Authoritarian consolidation in Singapore. The Pacific Review 16(4): 503–524.
Sim, Dewey. 2019. How Singapore’s LGBT movement became a force where others struggle. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from [URL] (13 November 2019).
Sinha, Vineeta. 2005. Theorising ‘talk’ about ‘religious pluralism’ and ‘religious harmony’ in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Religion 20(1): 25–40.
Spires, Anthony J. 2011. Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology 117(1): 1–45.
Stein, Arlene & Plummer, Ken. 1994. ‘I can’t even think straight’: ‘Queer’ theory and the missing sexual revolution in sociology. Sociological Theory 12(2): 178–187.
Tan, Kenneth Paul. 2012. ‘The ideology of pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore’. Journal of Contemporary Asia 42(1): 67–92.
Tan, Kenneth Paul & Gary Lee. 2007. Imagining the gay community in Singapore. Critical Asian Studies 39(2): 179–204.
. 2006. Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal + Document Design 14(2): 139–155.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
