Article published In: Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp.202–225
PrEP in the press
A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of how users of HIV-prevention treatment are represented in British newspapers
Published online: 7 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20002.jon
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20002.jon
Abstract
This research reports on newspaper representations of PrEP, a HIV-prevention drug recently made available on a trial basis
to at-risk individuals in England. Using corpus-assisted queer critical discourse analysis, we investigate the linguistic representations of
the users of PrEP within three leading British newspapers from across the political spectrum between 2014–18. We find that users of PrEP are
most frequently positioned as ‘men who have sex with men’ or ‘gay men’, a representation that we argue limits public awareness of HIV
itself, and of available HIV prevention. Furthermore, while the most left-leaning newspaper in our corpus focuses on the human benefit of
PrEP, the most right-leaning newspaper takes a moralistic stance which frames gay men as risk-taking and therefore less deserving of
healthcare funding than other groups. We therefore argue that certain representations of PrEP’s beneficiaries are implicitly homophobic, and
that most representations are unhelpfully restrictive.
Keywords: PrEP, HIV, corpus linguistics, queer critical discourse analysis, homophobia
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Representations of PrEP and its users in the UK press
- 3.Theoretical and analytical approach
- 3.1Queer critical discourse studies
- 3.2Conducting corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis
- 4.Corpus building
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Description of users: Frequency analysis
- 5.2Description of users: N-gram analysis
- 5.2.1‘Men who have sex with men’
- 5.2.2‘Gay and bisexual men’
- 5.2.3‘People living with HIV’
- 5.2.4‘People who are at high risk’
- 5.2.5Summary of corpus analysis
- 5.3Downsampling and closer textual analysis
- 5.3.1Stage 1: February 2015
- 5.3.2Stage 2: August 2016
- 5.3.3Stage 3: Summer/Autumn 2017
- 5.3.4Summary of qualitative analysis
- 6.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (29)
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, KhosraviNik, Majid, Krzyzanowski, Michał, McEnery, Tony & Wodak, Ruth. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306.
Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto & Rosso, Paulo. 2009. On automatic plagiarism detection based on N-grams comparison. In Proceedings of the 31th European Conference on IR Research on Advances in Information Retrieval, Mohand Boughanem, Catherine Berrut, Josiane Mothe, Chantal Soulé-Dupuy (eds), 696–700. Berlin: Springer.
Borland, Sophie & Spencer, Ben. 2016. What a Skewed Sense of Values. Daily Mail. 3 August, 2016: 11.
Brezina, Vaclav, Timperley, Matt & McEnery, Tony. 2018. #LancsBox v.4 [software]. Available at: [URL]
Cheng, Winnie, Greaves, Chris & Warren, Martin. 2006. From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4): 411–433.
Department of Health and Social Care. 2020. HIV drug PrEP to be available across England. Gov.UK. [URL] (accessed 19 March 2020)
Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Materializing Democracy, Russ Castronovo & Dana D. Nelson (eds), 175–193. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fairclough, Norman, Mulderrig, Jane & Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 357–378. London: Sage.
Hall, Kira. 2013. “It’s a hijra!” Queer linguistics revisited. Discourse and Society 24(5): 634–642.
Jaspal, Rusi & Nerlich, Brigitte. 2017. Polarised press reporting about HIV prevention: Social representations of pre-exposure prophylaxis in the UK press. Health 21(5): 478–497.
Jones, Lucy & Mills, Sara. 2014. Analysing agency: Reader responses to ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’. Gender and Language 8(2): 225–244.
Jørgensen, Marianne & Phillips, Louise. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Leap, William. 2015. ‘Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis’. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 661–680. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lovelock, Michael. 2018. Sex, death and austerity: Resurgent homophobia in the British tabloid press. Critical Studies in Media Communication 35(3): 225–239.
McCormack, Sheena, et al. 2016. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): Effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet 3871: 53–60.
McLaughlin, Margaret L., Ho, Jinghui, Meng, Jingbo, Hu, Chih-Wei, An, Zheng, Park, Mina & Nam, Yujung. 2016. Propagation of information about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention through Twitter. Health Communication 31(8): 998–1007.
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2011. Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2121: 149–179.
. 2018. Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and looking ahead. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7(2): 145–174.
. 2019. Discursive shifts associated with coming out: A corpus-based analysis of news reports about Ricky Martin. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(3): 284–302.
Mowlabocus, Sharif. 2019. ‘What a skewed sense of values’: Discussing PreP in the British press. Sexualities. Online first, available at:
Peterson, David. 2010. The “basis for a just, free and stable society”: Institutional homophobia and governance at the Family Research Council. Gender and Language 4(2): 257–286.
Public Health England. 2017. Towards Elimination of HIV Transmission, AIDS and HIV-Related Deaths in the UK. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust. [URL] (accessed 13 October 2019).
. 2018. PrEP Impact Trial: A Pragmatic Health Technology Assessment of PrEP and Implementation. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust. [URL] (accessed 15 May 2019).
Reyniers, Thijs, Hoornenborg, Elske, Vuylsteke, Bea, Wouters, Kristien & Laga, Marie. 2017. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for men who have sex with men in Europe: Review of evidence for a much needed prevention tool. Sexual Transmitted Infections 931: 363–367.
Smith, Matthew. 2017. How left- or right-wing are the UK’s newspapers? YouGov. [URL] (accessed 12 November 2019).
Thurlow, Crispin. 2016. Queering critical discourse studies or/and Performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies 13(5): 485–514.
van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Jones, Lucy, Mills, Sara & Paterson, Laura L. 2015. Implicit homophobic argument structure: equal marriage discourse in The Moral Maze. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(1): 102–137.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Cabrera, Laura & Sergio Villanueva Baselga
Jentoft, Elian Eve, Tony Sandset & Marit Haldar
Coelho, Simmona M., Joseph G. Rosen, Gretchen Schulz, Kristin Meek, Lillian Shipp, Chitra Singh, Kalai Willis, Alison Best, Mfezi Mcingana, Jenny Mcloughlin, Harry Hausler, Chris Beyrer, Stefan D. Baral & Sheree R. Schwartz
Lewis, Joseph & G. J. Melendez-Torres
Nonnenmacher, Sean
2024. Affective distress and heteronormative futurity in American puberty video discourse. Journal of Language and Sexuality 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bin Ibrahim, Muhamad Alif & Lai Peng Ho
Bin Ibrahim, Muhamad Alif & Lai Peng Ho
Bin Ibrahim, Muhamad Alif & Lai Peng Ho
Espejord, Idun Eskeland & Tony Sandset
Heritage, Frazer & Paul Baker
Wilkinson, Mark
Jones, Lucy
Phillips, Robert
2021. A corpus-assisted analysis of the discursive construction of LGBT Singaporeans in media coverage of Pink Dot. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
