Article published In: Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp.127–151
Menos masculino, demasiado infantil
How age and gender ideologies index sexuality in diminutive perception in Madrid Spanish
Published online: 7 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19013.had
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19013.had
Abstract
Age is an under-analyzed variable in linguistic research concerning gender and sexuality. We consider these three
constructs by examining diminutives as an index of gay sexuality in Madrid Spanish across two tasks. Although phonetic cues have received
great attention, morphological features (e.g. diminutives) may also index gayness ( 2014. Diminutives and masculinity. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 117–132. London: Routledge.).
Moreover, despite frequent usage across Spanish-speaking varieties, diminutives are primarily restricted to women and children in
north-central Spain (Haensch, Günther. 2002. Español de América y español de Europa (2ª parte). Panace 3(7): 37–64.). In a diminutive reaction task, 53 Madrid residents indicated
whether men, women, adults, or children were likely to have uttered diminutivized sentences. Mixed-effects models indicated that the number
of diminutives and sentence theme significantly affected perception, and participants’ evaluations in a free response task corroborated that
men using diminutives were considered effeminate, gay, and childish. Thus, even with sociophonetic cues removed, morphological phenomena
create a gay percept. This study demonstrates how age ideologies inform indexicalization processes related to gender and sexuality.
Keywords: diminutives, sexuality, gender, age, masculinity, indexicality, Madrid Spanish
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Spanish diminutive
- 2.1Functions of the diminutive
- 2.2Diminutive variation
- 2.3Diminutives and age, gender, and sexuality
- 3.Method
- 4.Results
- 4.1Overall rates of selection in diminutive reaction task
- 4.2Mixed-effects models for diminutive reaction task
- 4.3Item-analysis: Responses by number of diminutives and sentence theme
- 4.4Free response task data
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Contextualizing results through the free response task
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (36)
Aleza-Izquierdo, Milagros. 2016. El diminutivo en el español de Santo Domingo. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 671: 3–56.
Black, Chad. 2009. De Marica a Maricón: Following Definitions of Marica, Maricon, and Sodomía with the Real Academia Española [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, Nicholas Coupland (ed), 173–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caravedo, Rocío. 2010. Perú. In Manual de Dialectología Hispánica: El Español de América, Manuel Alvar (ed), 152–168. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.
Eckert, Penelope. 2014. The problem with binaries: Coding for gender and sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 529–535.
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2013. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2010. An examination of mitigation strategies used in Spanish psychotherapeutic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1964–1981.
Gutiérrez, Manuel J. 2013. Hablando en chiquito: -ito en el español de Houston. Bulletin of Spanish Studies 15(3): 295–313.
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 359–383.
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3): 533–578.
Kanwit, Matthew. 2015. The role of discourse topic in evidentiality marking: Variable (de)queísmo in Caracas. eHumanista/IVITRA 81: 446–470.
Kiesling, Scott F. 2002. Playing the straight man: Displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 249–266. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kiesling, Scott. F. 2018. Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA 13(3–4): 191–212.
Kiesling, Scott F. forthcoming. Stances of the ‘gay voice’ and ‘brospeak’: Towards a systematic model of stancetaking. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barret (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kishi, Daisuke. 2003. Variación léxica según el sexo en el lenguaje hablado de los jóvenes tapatíos. México y La Cuenca del Pacífico 6(20): 82–94.
Levon, Erez. 2006. Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech 811: 56–78.
Mendes, Ronald B. 2007. What is “gay speech” in São Paulo, Brazil. In International Perspectives on Gender and Language, José Santaemilia, Patricia Bou, Sergio Maruenda & Gora Zaragoza (eds), 296–305. València: Universitat de València.
2014. Diminutives and masculinity. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 117–132. London: Routledge.
Messerschmidt, James W. 2012. Engendering gendered knowledge: Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities 15(1): 56–76.
Milani, Tommaso. 2014. Theorizing language and masculinities. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 28–53. London: Routledge.
Monsiváis, Carlos. 2002. Los gays en México: La función, la ampliación, la consolidación del ghetto. Debate Feminista 261: 89–115.
Náñez Fernández, Emilio. 2006. El Diminutivo: Historia y Funciones en el Español Clásico y Moderno. Madrid: UAM Ediciones.
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39(3): 33–264.
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2002. Sharing resources and indexing meaning in the production of gay styles. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 175–189. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
RAE. n.d. Real Academia Española’s Diccionario de la lengua Española. Retrieved from [URL]
Regúnaga, Alejandra. 2005. Morfología derivativa: Consideraciones en torno al uso de diminutivos en la ciudad de Santa Rosa. Anclajes 91: 251–262.
Román, Juan J. O. 2007. Un territorio lingüístico en expansión geográfica: La jerga gay española. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense 27(1): 69–82.
Sedano, Mercedes & Bentivoglio, Paola. 2010. Venezuela. In Manual de Dialectología Hispánica: El Español de América, Manuel Alvar (ed), 116–133. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Escobar L.-Dellamary, Luis Daniel, Stephanie Cortés Aguilar & José de Jesús Velarde Inzunza
Hadodo, Matthew John
Posio, Pekka, Sven Kachel & Gloria Uclés-Ramada
Cashman, Holly R.
2021. Thickening language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Jones, Lucy
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
