Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014

Paterson, Laura L.; Coffey-Glover, Laura

doi:10.1075/jls.17022.pat

Article published In: Corpus Linguistics in Language and Sexuality Studies: Developments and Prospects
Edited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 175–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014

Laura L. Paterson | The Open University

Laura Coffey-Glover | Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom

Published online: 27 August 2018

https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17022.pat

Abstract

This paper interrogates media representations of same-sex marriage debates in the UK using a combination of corpus linguistics tools and close reading, and drawing on Queer Linguistics. Following related work by , , and , we analyse a 1.3 million-word corpus of UK national newspaper texts compiled for the Discourses of Marriage Research Group. Our corpus stretches from September 2011 and the announcement of a government consultation on same-sex marriage, to April 2014 when the first same-sex marriages took place. Using a top-down approach we investigate the discourses drawn upon in same-sex marriage debates (as indexed by keywords and key semantic fields) and uncover the binary social categories used to normalise social structures and hold the same-sex marriage debate in place. We also consider which social actors are (not) given a voice and/or agency and discuss how (same-sex) marriage is constituted.

Keywords: same-sex marriage, queer theory, discourse, corpus linguistics, social actors, semantic domains

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.Queer Theory, corpus linguistics, and same-sex marriage debates
3.Building the corpus
4.Analysis
- 4.1The terms of debate
- 4.2The semantics of same-sex marriage
- 4.3Defining marriage
- 4.4Social actors and agency
5.Discussion and conclusions
Notes
References

References (21)

References

Bachmann, Ingo. 2011. Civil partnership – “gay marriage in all but name”: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105.

Baker, Paul. 2004. “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 88–106.

Barrett, Rusty. 2002. Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI Press.

BBC. 2017. Heterosexual couple lose civil partnership challenge. BBC News. <[URL]> (July 13, 2017)

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

. 1993. Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.

Findlay, Jamie. 2017. Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords revisited. Journal of Language and Sexuality 6(1): 30–60.

Jäkel, Olaf. 2014. Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse: Defining the definition of marriage. Journal of Language and Politics 13(2): 336–363.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychlý, Pavel, Smrž, Pavel & Tugwell, David. 2004. The Sketch Engine. Information Technology. <[URL]> (May 13, 2017)

Koller, Veronika. 2009. Analysing collective identity in discourse: Social actors and contexts. In Critical Discourse Analysis I: Notions of Context and Social Actors, Adele Petitclerc & Philippe Schepens (eds), 69–95. Besançon–Cedex: Presses Universitaire de Franche–Comté.

Leap, William. 2013. Queering language and normativity. Discourse & Society 24(5): 643–648.

Love, Robbie & Baker, Paul. 2015. The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language, Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 57–86.

Motschenbacher, Heiko & Stegu, Martin. 2013. Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society 24(5): 519–535.

OED. 1989. Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rayson, Paul. 2009. Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. <[URL]> (April 8, 2017)

Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 61. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software

Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.

Turner, Georgina, Mills, Sara, van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Paterson, Laura L. & Jones, Lucy. 2018. Opposition as victimhood in media debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse & Society 29(2): 180–197.

van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Jones, Lucy, Mills, Sara & Paterson, Laura L. 2015. Implicit homophobic argument structure: Equal marriage discourse in The Moral Maze. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(1): 102–137.

van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–70. London: Routledge.

. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Order by:

Martinc, Matej, Nina Perger & Senja Pollak

2025. Viewpoint detection on LGBT + reporting using contextual embeddings and qualitative thematic analysis: The use case on the word deep . Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 165-166:1-2 ► pp. 154 ff.

Yoshimoto, Keisuke

2025. Debating same-sex marriage in Japan: Legitimation strategies in parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Communication 19:5 ► pp. 845 ff.

Yoshimoto, Keisuke

2025. Anywhere but here: Discourses and representations surrounding same-sex marriage in Japanese newspapers. Applied Corpus Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 100120 ff.

Arden, Declan & Mershen Pillay

2024. Queer Representation in Mandarin Chinese Language Learning Textbooks of the United Kingdom. International Journal of Educational Research 127 ► pp. 102433 ff.

Kalejaiye, Abiola Sakirat

2024. A Pragma-Gender Study of Select Couples’ Emotive Language. In Gender and Leadership in Nigeria and Ghana, ► pp. 141 ff.

Paterson, Laura L. & Mark McGlashan

2024. Same-sex marriage, gay marriage, or equal marriage?. Journal of Language and Sexuality 13:2 ► pp. 129 ff.

Gover, Daniel

2023. Religious lobbying and policy influence: Christian interest group impacts around the legalization of same‐sex marriage in England and Wales. Politics & Policy 51:6 ► pp. 1097 ff.

Hill, G. & C. Bulley

2023. Help me to come out gracefully! Working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual, people affected by cancer to develop a national practitioner guide supporting inclusive care. Radiography 29 ► pp. S81 ff.

Jantunen, Jarmo Harri & Samu Kytölä

2022. Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Wilkinson, Mark

2022. Radical contingency, radical historicity and the spread of ‘homosexualism’: A diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis of queer representation in The Times between 1957–1967 and 1979–1990. Discourse, Context & Media 48 ► pp. 100623 ff.

Zheng, Yue & Lik Sam Chan

2022. Framing same-sex marriage in U.S. liberal and conservative newspapers from 2004 to 2016: Changes in issue attributes, organizing themes, and story tones. The Social Science Journal 59:1 ► pp. 34 ff.

Jones, Lucy

2021. Queer linguistics and identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 13 ff.

Šabec, Ksenija, Metka Mencin & Nina Perger

2021. A Dry Branch on the Nation’s Body: The Nation’s Biological Reproduction between Gender and Sexuality. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies / Razprave in Gradivo, Revija za narodnostna vprašanja 87:87 ► pp. 69 ff.

Kania, Ursula

2020. Marriage for all (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the marriage equality debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies 17:2 ► pp. 138 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.