Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:3 (2010) ► pp.339–363
Society, polity, and language community
An enlightenment trinity in anthropological perspective
Published online: 1 November 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.01sil
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.01sil
How do the social institutional agglomerations we call societies interact with levels of political groupness up to and including states and beyond? In the modern First World and more widely, the post-Lockean Enlightenment has brought denotational language itself to the fore as the salient vehicle of mediation — presumed upon by theorists as well as by politicians — by which stable polities have depended upon the existence of social institutions of various sorts. Reciprocally, such mediation has underlain ideological consciousness of what a language community should normatively be like, to wit, a polity-in-potentia able to assert “language rights” in a politics of recognition in a wider social order. This political culture has shaped some of the more salient forces on language communities within the social institutional order of complex, plurilingual speech communities in which people actually live.
References (51)
Adams, Karen L. & Brink, Daniel T. (eds.). 1990. Perspectives on Official English; the Campaign for English as the Official Language of the USA. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Agha, Asif. 2004. Registers of language. In: Alessandro Duranti (ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, 23–45.
Anderson, Benedict R. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Baron, Dennis. 1990. The English-Only Question: An Official Language for Americans? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Blommaert, Jan. 2009. Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology 50(4), 415–441.
Blommaert, Jan. & Verschueren, Jef. 1998. The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. In: Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 189–210.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. John B. Thompson (ed.); Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson (trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don. (eds.). 2006. The Language and Sexuality Reader. London & New York: Routledge.
Crawford, James. (ed.). 1992. Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1966. On contextual meaning. In: C. E. Bazell, J. C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday, and R. H. Robins (eds.). In Memory of J. R. Firth. London: Longmans, 79–95.
Fliegelman, Jay. 1993. Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Garvin, Paul. 1964. The standard language problem — concepts and methods. In: Dell Hymes (ed.). Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row, 521–523.
Grillo, Ralph D. 1989. Dominant Languages: Language and Hierarchy in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gustafson, Thomas. 1992. Representative Words: Politics, Literature, and the American Language, 1776–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Thomas Burger (trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Haller, William. 1938. The Rise of Puritanism; or, The Way to the New Jerusalem as Set Forth in Pulpit and Press from Thomas Cartwright to John Lilburne and John Milton, 1570–1643. New York: Columbia University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1968. The users and uses of language. In: Joshua A. Fishman (ed.). Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton & Co., 139–169.
Halliday, Michael A. K., McIntosh, Angus, & Strevens, Peter. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans.
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Language Conflict and Language Planning: The Case of Modern Norwegian. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Howe, John. 2004. Language and Political Meaning in Revolutionary America. Amherst & Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
Hymes, Dell H. 1964. Reference note [on language standardization]. In: Dell Hymes (ed.). Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row, 523–526.
Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Standardization. In: Keith Brown (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, vol. 121, 121–127.
Jones, Richard Foster. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language; a Survey of Opinions Concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kim, Victoria. 2009. American Justice in a Foreign Language. Los Angeles Times, February 21, electronic edition. ([URL]).
Looby, Christopher. 1996. Voicing America: Language, Literary Form, and the Origins of the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ortner, Sherry B., & Whitehead, Harriet. (eds.). 1981. Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, T[homas] B[ertram] W[allace]. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum 8(1), 28–37.
Rosaldo, Michelle Z., & Lamphere, Louise. (eds.). 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sapir, Edward. 1932. Group. In: Edwin R. A. Seligman and Alvin Johnson (eds.). The Encyclopædia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, vol. 71, 178–182.
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shils, Edward. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Selected Papers of Edward Shils, vol. 21. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Silverstein, Michael. 1996a. Indexical order, and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. In: Risako Ide, et al., eds., SALSA 3 [= Texas Linguistic Forum, no. 36]. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, 266–295.
Silverstein, Michael. 1996b. Monoglot “standard” in America: standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In: Donald Brenneis and Ronald H. S. Macaulay (eds.). The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 284–306.
Silverstein, Michael. 1998. The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In: Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 123–145.
Silverstein, Michael. 2000. Whorfianism and the linguistic imagination of nationality. In: Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.). Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities . Santa Fe, N. Mex.: School of American Research Press, 85–138.
Urciuoli, Bonnie. 1985. Bilingualism as code and bilingualism as practice. Anthropological Linguistics 27(4), 363–386.
1991. The political topography of Spanish and English: The view from a New York Puerto Rican neighborhood. American Ethnologist 18(2), 295–310.
1996. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race, and Class. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Cited by (32)
Cited by 32 other publications
Ji, Eugene Yu
Masquelier, Bertrand
Babcock, Joshua
Cox, Whitney
Mannheim, Bruce
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian
Saraceni, Mario & Camille Jacob
Crapanzano, Vincent
Karrebæk, Martha Sif
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul
Rosa, Jonathan Daniel
Carta, Caterina
Jackson, Jennifer
Moore, Robert
Raymond, Chase Wesley
Silverstein, Michael
Kraus, Peter A. & Rūta Kazlauskaitė-Gürbüz
Dunmire, Patricia L.
Swinehart, Karl F. & Kathryn Graber
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Ruth Wodak
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
