Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:3 (2009) ► pp.433–455
No way forward without consensus
Church leaders envision ‘The Zimbabwe we want’
Published online: 15 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.06lov
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.06lov
This paper discusses a document produced in 2006 by church leaders which claimed to present a “vision” of “a way forward” in the ongoing crisis in Zimbabwe. We suggest that the document served rather to reinforce the status quo, specifically the hegemony of Mugabe’s government. We argue that, by insisting that the greatest problem in Zimbabwe is “lack of a national vision”, the document promoted consensus, which resonated with Mugabe’s own position. We suggest that four major strategies were used to achieve this: assertion of the primarily spiritual nature of Zimbabwe’s crisis; insistence on the shared responsibility of all Zimbabweans; obfuscation of agency for the crisis and delegitimization of political opposition as a route to change. Finally, we point out that these strategies failed, as the document in its original form was censored before its launch, illustrating the tendency for President Mugabe to give the impression of opening democratic space, only to close it off.
References (17)
Alexander, Jocelyn. 2006. ‘Legacies of Violence in Matabeleland Zimbabwe’. In Preben Kaarsholm (ed.). Violence, Political Culture and Development in Africa. Oxford: James Currey Limited: 105—121.
Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace (CCJP) and Legal Resources Foundation (LRF). 1999. Breaking The Silence, Building True Peace. A report on the disturbances in Matabele-land and the Midlands, 1980—1988. A Summary. Harare: CCJP & LDF. [URL]
Chilton, Paul and Schäffner, Christina. 1997. Discourse and Politics. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 206—230.
Dorman, Sara R. 2002. ‘Rocking the Boat?’ Church NGOs and Democratization in Zimbabwe. African Affairs 1011: 75—92.
. 2003. NGOs and the Constitutional Debate in Zimbabwe: from Inclusion to Exclusion. Journal of Southern African Studies 29 (4): 845—863.
Huckin, Thomas N. 2002. Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness. Discourse & Society 13(3): 347—372.
Matikinye, Ray. 2006. Vision document was ‘doctored’, allege Jesuits. Zimbabwe Independent: November 24.
Miller, Donna R. 2004. “�to meet our common challenge”: ENGAGEMENT strategies of alignment and alienation in current US international discourse. Textus XVII/1. [URL] accessed 7 June 2007.
Morrison, Andrew D. and Love,. Alison M. 1996. A discourse of disillusionment: Letters to the Editor in two Zimbabwean magazines 10 years after independence. Discourse & Society 7 (1): 39—75.
Raftopoulos, Brian. 2005. Prospects for National Dialogue in Zimbabwe. [URL] accessed 5 August 2007. Ranger, Terence O. 1985. Peasant Consciousness and Guerrilla War in Zimbabwe. Oxford: James
Currey Ltd “Rift erupts over church report in Zim”. 2006. [URL] accessed 17 May 2007.
Sithole, Masipula and Makumbe, John. 1997. Elections in Zimbabwe: The ZANU (PF) Hegemony and its Incipient Decline. African Journal of Political Science 2 (1): 122—139.
Wakatama, Pius. 2006 National Vision document buys time for government The Standard, 19 November 2006 [URL] accessed 25 July 2008
White, Peter R.R. 2002. Appraisal: the language of attitudinal evaluation and intersubjective stance. [URL] accessed 14 September 2009
Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops Conference, Evangelical Fellowship of Zimbabwe & Zimbabwe Council of Churches. September 18, 2006. The Zimbabwe We Want: “Towards a National Vision for Zimbabwe”. [URL] accessed 8 August, 2007
Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops’ Conference. 2007. God Hears the Cries of the Oppressed. Pastoral Letter. [URL] accessed 8 June 2007
