Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:2 (2009) ► pp.269–286
Blair speeches in a polyphonic perspective
NOTs and BUTs in visions on Europe
Published online: 9 September 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.05flo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.05flo
In this article we examine some linguistic characteristics of two speeches made by Tony Blair, in the British (2004) and the European (2005) parliaments. These speeches can be characterised as visionary speeches on Europe and European integration. By introducing a polyphonic perspective, we will point to specific linguistic features, such as polemic negation by ‘not’ and contrastive-concessive constructions by ‘but’, revealing different types of hidden interaction in which explicit and implicit voices are interwoven. Combined with the identification of pronominal references (to self and others), this perspective helps to spell out the complex relationship between text and context, in particular how to define a relevant context in a text analysis, and how the text itself constitutes its context. The theoretical framework used for analysing the speeches will be linguistic polyphony, as developed in the ScaPoLine theory.
References (21)
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner. 2002. Politics as Text and Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. Blair’s contribution to elaborating a new ‘doctrine of international community’. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 41—63.
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2004. Polyfonisk interaksjon via IKKE i vitenskapelig diskurs. Rhetorica Scan-dinavica 311, 23—40.
. 2005a. The self and the others � polyphonic visibility in research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 29—44.
. 2005b. MOI et AUTRUI dans le discours scientifique: l’exemple de la négation NE�PAS. In: Jacques Bres, Patrick Pierre Haillet, Sylvie Mellet, Henning Nølke, and Laurence Rosier (eds). Dialogisme, polyphonie: approches linguistiques. Duculot, 323—337.
. 2006. Interrelation de voix internes et externes dans le discours. In: Laurent Perrin (ed). Le sens et ses voix. Metz: Recherches Linguistiques (281), 301—322.
Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Dahl, and Torodd Kinn. 2006. Academic Voices. Across languages and disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Just, Sine Nørholm. 2004. The constitution of meaning � a meaningful constitution? Legitimacy, identity, and public opinion in the debate on the future of Europe. (Doctoral dissertation). Copenhagen: CBS.
Kinn, Torodd. 2005. Plays of we-hood: What do we mean by we? Akademisk Prosa 3,129—142.Skrifter fra KIAP. University of Bergen.
Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2005. European Identity Wanted! On discursive and communicative dimensions of the European Convention. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137—163.
Nølke, Henning, Kjersti Fløttum, and Coco Norén. 2004. ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.
Oberhuber, Florian, Christophe Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heintz SchÖnbauer, and Ruth Wodak. 2005. Debating the European Constitution: On representations of Europe/ the EU in the press. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 227—271.
Svensson, Peter and Dag Stenvoll. 2007. Contextualisation of text, textualisation of context. Paper delivered at the EURUN workshop on text/context, Bergen May 3rd 2007.
Wodak, Ruth and Peter Chilton (eds)>
. 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth and Gilbert Weiss 2004. Visions, Ideologies and Utopias in the Discursive Construction of European Identities: Organizing, Representing and Legitimizing Europe. In: Martin Pütz, Joanne Neff-van Aertselaer, and Teun Adrianus van Dijk (eds). Communicating Ideologies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Discourse, and Social Practice. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
2005. Analysing European Union discourses. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121—135.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Dudlák, Tamás
Wang, Guofeng, Xiuzhen Wu, Yupei Xiang & Yingzi Qu
Hamed, Dalia
Brusenbauch Meislova, Monika
Vuković, Milica
Fløttum, Kjersti & Coco Noren
Stenvoll, Dag & Peter Svensson
Fløttum, Kjersti
Fløttum, Kjersti
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
