Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:2 (2009) ► pp.223–243
Beyond the Bosphorus?
Comparing public discourses on Turkey’s EU application in the German, French and British quality press
Published online: 9 September 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.03wim
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.03wim
This article examines the impact of national borders on public discourses, based on a case study of the struggle surrounding Turkey’s application to join the European Union (EU). Comparing opinions, reasons and interpretation patterns in quality press commentaries about enlarging the EU beyond the Bosphorus, the article confirms the importance and robustness of national cleavages between the German and the French public spheres on the one hand and the British public sphere on the other. Whereas Turkish membership was predominantly rejected on the continent, the British commentators strongly and almost unanimously supported Ankara’s request. These similarities and divergences, I argue, are first and foremost the result of competing visions of Europe’s finality, especially regarding various constitutional ideas and cultural principles. Against this background, the Turkey question was partly exploited as an instrument to advance or to suppress different concepts on the future of European integration.
Keywords: media, France, political culture, Germany, EU enlargement, UK, Turkey, European integration, ideas, public discourse, identity
References (36)
Checkel, Jeffrey. 1999. Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1), 83—114.
Diez, Thomas. 1999. Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), 598—613.
. 2001. Europe as a Discursive Battleground: European Integration Studies and Discourse Analysis. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (1), 5—38.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing. Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4), 51—58.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Finnemore, Martha and Kathrin Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Chance. International Organization 52 (4), 887—917.
Forster, Anthony. 2002. Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945. London: Routledge.
Frank, Robert. 2002. The Meanings of Europe in French National Discourses: A French Europe or an Europeanized France? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 311—326.
Gates, Andrea. 2005. Negotiating Turkey’s Accession. The Limitations of the Current EU Strategy. European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (3), 381—398.
Goldstein, Judith and Robert O. Keohane. (eds.) 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Holden, Gerard. 2002. Who contextualizes the Contextualizers? Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse. Review of International Studies 28 (3), 253—270.
Howarth, David and Jacob Torfing. (eds.)2005. Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jabko, Nicolas. 2004. The Importance of Being Nice: An Institutionalist Analysis of French PReferences on the Future of Europe. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 282—301.
Jachtenfuchs, Markus, Thomas Diez, and Sabine Jung. 1998. Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order. European Journal of International Relations 4 (4), 409—445.
Kassim, Hussein. 2004. The United Kingdom and the Future of Europe: Winning the Battle, Losing the War. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 261—281.
Kevin, Deirdre. 2003. Europe in the Media. A Comparison of Reporting, Representation, and Rhetoric in National Media Systems in Europe. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krzyzanowski, Michal and Florian Oberhuber. 2007. (Un)doing Europe. Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Bruxelles: Lang.
Larsen, Henrik. 1999. British and Danish European Politics in the 1990s: A Discourse Approach. European Journal of International Relations 5 (4), 451—83.
Ludlow, Piers. 2002. Us or Them? The Meaning of Europe in British Political Discourse. In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 101—124.
Marcussen, Martin, Thomas Risse, Daniela Engelmann-Martin, Hans Joachim Knopf, and Klaus Roscher. 1999. Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British and German Nation State Identities. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), 614—633.
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations. A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2), 225—254.
Müller, Harald. 2004. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3), 395—435.
Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heinz SchÖnhuber, and Ruth Wodak. 2005. Debating the European Constitution. On Representations of Europe/the EU in the Press. Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2), 227—271
Richardson, John E. 2006. Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1), 1—39.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1996. Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1), 53—80.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1), 47—80.
Spohn, Wilfried. 2002. Continuities and Changes of Europe in German National Identity. In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 285—309.
Thielemann, Eiko R. 2004. Dividing Competences: Germany’s Vision(s) for Europe’s Federal Future. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 358—374.
Wæver, Ole. 1998. Explaining Europe by Decoding Discourses. In: Anders Wivel (ed.). Explaining European Integration. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 100—146.
. 2002. Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy. Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory. In: Lena Hansen and Ole Wæver (eds.). European Integration and National Identity. The Challenge of the Nordic States. London/ New York: Routledge, 20—49.
. 2004. Discursive Approaches. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.). European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 197—215.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Gulmez, Seckin Baris, Alp Eren Topal & Bahar Rumelili
ERİŞEN, Hanife & Nilüfer TÜRKSOY
Hamid-Turksoy, Nilyufer, Giselinde Kuipers & Liesbet Van Zoonen
Minkenberg, Michael, Hajo G Boomgaarden, Claes H de Vreese & André Freire
Steunenberg, Bernard, Simay Petek & Christiane Rüth
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
