Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:2 (2009) ► pp.195–222

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Between “I” and “We”

Studying the grammar of social identity in Europe (1900–1950)

 | Smolny College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, St.Petersburg and University of Konstanz
Published online: 9 September 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.02pos
Starting with Rene Descartes and Albrecht Dürer, Europeans obsessively contemplated, registered and expressed their being-in-the-world and assigned those self-expressions a universal cognitive value. Such generalized personal accounts as Cartesian cogito ergo sum or John Locke’s memory- based theory of personal identity formed the basis of sweeping statements about nations and epochs. For instance, the turn-of-the-century decadent deconstruction of subjectivity brought to life the myth of a smooth transition from the 19th century individuated (‘I’-based) Self to the 20th century shared (‘We’-based) Self. To correct this uninformative and factually inaccurate social description of personal identity, I suggest searching for social identities beyond the realm of self-reflection. In this light, a cursory survey of first-person statements found in books, journals and newspapers published in major European languages between the First and the Second World Wars, is subjected to various kinds of discursive analysis in the light of the chosen topic. As a result, a few politically and aesthetically privileged self-identifications of Europeans give way to a diverse social hierarchy, providing a possible strategy for linguistic description of social identity beyond the European terrain.
References (109)
References
Adorno Theodor. [1956] 1990. Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alighieri Dante. [1321] 1965. La Divina Commedia. Milano: Martello.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anscombe G. E. M. 1975. The First Person. In: Samuel Guttenplan (ed.). Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arendt Hannah. 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York:Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ardrey Robert 1966. Territorial Imperative. New York: Kodansha Globe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnheim Rudolf 1978. Space as an Image of Time. In: Karl Kroeber, William Walling (eds.). Images of Romanticism: Verbal and Visual Affinities, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1—12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Assman Jan. 1992. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergson Henri. [1906] 2001. L’évolution créatrice. Paris: Quadrige.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlage Andreas. 1994. Empfindung, Ich und Sprache um 1900: Ernst Mach, Herman Bahr und Fritz Mauthner im Zusammenhang. Frankfurt am Main: Fritz Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernauer Markus. 1990. ästhetik der Masse. Basel: Wiese.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielefeld Ulrich. 2003. Nation und Gesellschaft. Selbstthematisierungen in Frankreich in Deutschland. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Biran Maine. [1800s] 1966. L’effort Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BÖschenschtein Bernhard. 1988. HÖlderlins ‘Tod des Empedokles’. In: Ulrich Füllerborn, Manfred Engel (eds.). Das neuzeitliche Ich in der Literatur des 18. und 20. Jahrhunderts. München: Fink, 219—229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borst Arno. 1979. Barbarossa’s Erwachen. In: Odo Marquard, Karlheinz Stierle (eds.). Identität München: Fink, 17—60 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broszat Martin 1960. Der Nationalismus. Weltanschauung, Program und Wirklichkeit. München: Deutscher Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botev Christo. [1873a] 1971. Komu da govorim i kakvo da govorim, kogato nikoi ne ni chuie. In: Christo Botev. S’brani s’chineniia v dva toma, Tom 2. Sofia: B’lgarski pisatel, 282—284.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1873b] 1971. Zaschio i za kogo pisha? In: Christo Botev. S’brani s’chineniia v dva toma, Tom 2. Sofia: B’lgarski pisatel, 300—303.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1874] 1971. Zaschio i za kogo az pisha. In: Christo Botev. S’brani s’chineniia v dva toma, Tom 2. Sofia: B’lgarski pisatel, 498—503.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugmann Karl. 1904. Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprache: Eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Lepzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burrow John W. 2000. The Crisis of Reason: European Thought, 1848—1914. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cassirer Ernst. [1923] 1997. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. [Band] 2. Das mythische Denken. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castañeda Hector-Neri. 1999. The Phenomeno-logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consiiousness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Certeau Michel. 1986. Heterologies. Discourse of the Other. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton Paul. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson Donald. 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demetriou, Andreas. 2000. Organization and Development of Self-Understanding and Self-regulation: Towards a General Theory. In: Monique Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, Moshe Zeidner (eds.). Handbook of Self-Regulation. San San: Academic Press, 210—299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürrenberger Gregor. 1989. Menschliche Territorien. Geographische Aspekte der biologischen Evolution. Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunham Vera S. 1976. In Stalin’s Time: Middleclass Values in Soviet Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elias Norbert. 1987. Die Gesellschaft der Individuen. Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliott Jane 2005. Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evola J. 1920. L’arte come libert� e come egoismo � prologo. Noi, 11, 6—7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fichte Johann G. [1796] 1979. Grundlage des Naturrechts. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1804]. Die Wissenschaftslehre. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank Manfred. 1992: Allegorie, Witz, Fragment, Ironie. Friedrich Schlegel und die Idee des zerrisenen Selbst. In: Willem van Rejien (ed.). Allegorie und Melancholie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 124—146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freud Sigmund. [1921] 1993. Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. Die Zukunft einer Illusion. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1923] 1992. Das Ich und das Es. Metapsychologische Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerhard Ute, Link Jürgen. 1991. Zum Anteil der Kollektivsymbolik an den Nationalstereotypen. In: Jürgen Link, Wolf Wülfing (eds.). Nationale Mythen und Symbole in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Strulture und Funktionen von Konzepten nationaler Identität. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 19911, 16—52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber F, Holstein James. A. 1998. Narrative Practice and the Coherence of Personal Stories. Sociological Quarterly, 39 (1), 163—187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg Joseph H. 1966. Some Universals of GrammarWith Particular Reference to the Meaningful Elements. In: Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966), 73—113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton III William J, Watt Kennenth E.F. 1970. Refuging. Annual Review of Biological Systems, 11, 263—286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hebbel Friedrich. [1843] 1965. Ich und Du. In: Friedrich Hebbel, Sämtliche Werke, Band 1. München: Müller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heckmann Heinz-Dieter. 1991. Wer (oder was) Ich bin? Zur Deutung des intentionalen Selbstbezuges aus der Perspective der ersten Person singularis. In: Bertran Kienzle, Helmut Pape (eds). Dimensionen der Selbst: Selbstbewusstsein, Reflexivität und die Bedingungen der Kommunikation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 64—84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heymann Thomas. 1989. Komplexität und Kollektivität des Sozialraumes. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka Jaakko. 1974. Knowledge and the Known. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hume David. [1737] 1969. A Treatise on Human Nature. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jantsch Erich 1980. The Self-Organizing Universe, Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen Otto. [1924] 1963. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karavelov Liuben. [1874] 1968. Znaesh’ li ti koi sme? Liuben Karavelov. V”zrozhdenski feiletoni. Sofiia: B”lgarski pisatel’, 187—191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kartschoke Dieter. 2001. Ich-Darstellung in der volkssprachigen Literatur. In: Richard van Dülmen (ed.) Entdeckung des Ich. Die Geschichte der Individualisierung vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. KÖln: BÖhlau. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korzhikhina Tatiana P 1997. Izvol’te byt’ blagonadezhny! Moskva: Rosspen, 1997.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kracauer Siegfried. [1927] 1963. Das Ornament der Masse. In: Siegfried Kracauer. Das Ornament der Masse. Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 50—63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kris Ernst. [1936]. 1952. Laughter as an Expressive Process. Contribution to the Psychoanalysis of Expressive Behavior. In: Ernst Kris. Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: Schocken Books, 216—238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff George, Johnson Marc. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh:the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence D.H. [1920s] 1957. The Red Wolf. In: D.H.Lawrence, The Complete Poems. Vol. II1. Melbourne: Heinemann, 139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson Stephen G. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leyrer Georg. 1997. Das überindividuum. Arthur Schopenhauer, der Nationalsozialismus, Wir und Ich. Wien: Universiät Wien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke John. [1698] 1959. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Vol. 11. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loffler-Laurian Anne-Marie. 1980. L’ Expression du locuteur dans les discours scientifiques. Revue de linguistique Romane 441, 135—157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz Adolf [1936] 1949. Ich durfte helfen. Mein Leben und Wirken. Wien: Albrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubbock John 1893. The Beauties of Nature and the Wonders of the World we Live In Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luhmann Niklas. [1998] 2002. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luther Martin [1525] 1917. Wir glauben all an einen Gott. In: Martin Luther, Werke. Bd.1. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut, 14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitinskaia, Ksenia E. 1969. Mestoimeniia v iazykakh raznykh system. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Makarski Wladyslaw. 1973. Konstrukcje pluralis maiestatis w gwarach rzeczowszczyzny. Poradnik Jezykowy 11, 30—34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malcolm Norman. 1979. Whether ‘I’ is a referring expression. In: Cora Diamond and Jenny Teichman (eds.). Intention and intentionality. Sussex: Harvester Press, 14—28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margueritte Paul [1940]. Nous, les méres� Paris: Plon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marinetti Filippo Tommaso. 1923. A chacun, chaque jour, un métier different (L’Inégalisme). Noi, 41, 1—2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merten Klaus. 1977. Kommunikation Eine Begriffs- und Prozessanalyse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern Christian. [1914]. 1934. Die Weisheit meines hÖhern Ich. In: Christian Morgen-stern. Wir fanden einen Pfad. München: Piper, 28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler Peter, Harrè Rom, Freyne Michael. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller Ruth. 1993. F. T. Marinettis Manifeste zum Totaltheater. Wien: Universität Wien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nenon Monica. 1993. “Wir Jünglinge”: Selbstkonstitution und Ausschlussverfahren in Klop-stocks Ode Der Zürchersee . In: Bärbel GÖtz, Ortrud Gutjahr, Irmgard Roebling (eds.). Verschwiegenes Ich. Vom Un-Ausdrücklichen in autobiographischen Texten. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus Verlagsgesellschaft, 83—93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ostwald Wilhelm. 1902. Vorlesungen über Naturphilosophie. Leipzig: Veit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pagliuka Maria. 1997. ‘Je’ et ‘nous’. La metamorphose du sujet dans Terre des Hommes d’Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Instituto universitario Orientale, Annali (Sezione Romanza) 391, 515—531.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons Talcott, Shils Edward A. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget Jean, Inhelder Bärbel. 1948. La representation d’espace chez l’enfant Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postoutenko Kirill 2006. “Mezhdu ‘ia’ i ‘my’: k voprosy o sotsial”noi grammatike Evropy v promezhutke mezhdu Pervoi i Vtoroi mirovymi voinami”, Povestvovavnie i istoriia. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 427—434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappoport Anatol. 1953. Operational Philosophy: Integrating Knowledge and Action New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riedel Manfred. 1988. Grund und Abgrund der Subjektivität. In: Ulrich Füllerborn, Manfred Engel (eds.). Das neuzeitliche Ich in der Literatur des 18. und 20. Jahrhunderts. München: Fink, 29—57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg Morrice, Rosenberg Florence. 1981. The Occupational Self: A Developmental Study. In: Mervyn D. Lynch, Ardyth A. Norem-Hebeisen, Kenneth J. Gergen (eds.). Self-concept. Advances in Theory and Research. Minneapolis: Ballinger Publishing Company, 172—189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan Judith. 1991. The Vanishing Subject: Early Psychology and Literary Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sack R.D. 1986. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Ochs and Thompson 1996. Introduction. In: Emanuel A. Schegloff, Elinor Ochs and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schelling Friedrich W. J. [1800] 1992. System des transzandentalen Idealismus. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schewan A. 1913. The pluralis maiestatis in Homer. Classical Quarterly 71, 125—131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schurig Volker 1975. Naturgeschichte des Psychischen. Band 2. Lernen und Abstraktionsleistungen bei Tieren. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütz Alfred, Luckmann Thomas. 1991. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Band 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz Howard S. 1987. On the Psychodynamics of Organizational Totalitarianism. Journal of Management 13 (1), 41—54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoenfeldt Michael C. 1999. Bodies and selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Invardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serino Carmencita. 1998. The Personal-Social Interplay: Social-Cognitive Prospects on Identity and Self-Others Comparison. In: Stephen Worchel, J. Francisco Morales, Dar�o Páez, Jean-Claude Deschamps (eds.). Social Identity: International Perspectives. London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 24—43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair J. McH. 1987. On the Integration of Linguistic Description. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Academic Press, 13—27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slotty Friedrich. 1927. Der sog[enannte] pluralis modestiae. Indogermanische Forschungen XLIV1, 161—162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinberg, Mark. 2002. Proletarian Imagination: Self, Modernity and The Sacred in Russia, 1910—1925. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephens Anthony. 1988. “Wie beim Eintritt in ein anders Leben:” Geburtsmetapher und Individualität bei Kleist. In: Ulrich Füllerborn, Manfred Engel (eds.). Das neuzeitliche Ich in der Literatur des 18. und 20. Jahrhunderts. München: Fink, 195—214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stites Richard. 1989. Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in the Russian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoichita Victor. 1998. Das Selbstbewusste Bild. Vom Ursprung der Metamalerei. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson Paul F. 1959. Individuals: Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajfel Henry. 1981. Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor Ralph B. 1988. Human Territorial Functioning: an Empirical, Evolutionary Perspective on Individual and Small Group territorial Cognitions, Behaviors and Concequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tugendhat Ernst. 1979. Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung: Sprachanalytische Interpretationen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Egozentrizät und Mystik: Eine Anthropologische Studie. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner John C. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford & New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varela Francisco J. 1981. Autonomy and Autopoesis. In: Gerhard Roth, Helmut Schwegler (eds.) Self-Organizing Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 24—38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales Kathleen. 1980. Exophora Re-examined: The Uses of the Personal Pronoun ‘We’ in Present day-English. University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics 121, 22—44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walzel Oscar. [1916] 1968. Schicksale des lyrischen Ichs. In: Oscar Walzel, Das Wortkunstwerk. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 260—275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wat Alexandr. [1920] 1978. JA s jednei strony i JA z drugiej strony mego mopsozelaznego piecyka. In: Helena Zaworska (ed.). Antologia polskiego futurizmu u nowej sztuki. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 225—271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Wiese Leopold. 1965. Die Philosophie der personlichen Fürworter. Tübingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich Dieter. 1982. Sprache und Raum. Studium Linguistik 121, 1—19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamiatin Evgeny. [1920] 1989. My. Moskva: SovremennikGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement through Language. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Carta, Caterina
2014. Use of metaphors and international discourse: The EU as an Idiot power, a deceptive Pangloss and a Don Juan in his infancy. Cooperation and Conflict 49:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Carta, Caterina
2015. The swinging “we”. Journal of Language and Politics 14:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Heinz, Matthew
2011. Transmen on the Web. In The Handbook of Gender, Sex, and Media, ► pp. 326 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue