Cover not available

Article published In: Branding Political Entities in a Globalised World
Edited by Bessie Mitsikopoulou
[Journal of Language and Politics 7:3] 2008
► pp. 372–390

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Branding and strategic maneuvering in the Romanian presidential election of 2004

A critical discourse-analytical and pragma-dialectical perspective

 | University of Bucharest
Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.3.02iet
In this paper I analyse differences in the legitimation strategies used by and on behalf of the two presidential candidates in the elections of December 2004 in Romania, using a combination of Critical Discourse Analysis and pragmadialectics. These differences are seen to lie primarily in the varieties of populist discourse that were drawn upon in the construction of legitimizing arguments for both candidates: a paternalist type vs. a radical, anti-political type of populism. I relate the success of the latter type to more effective strategic maneuvering in argumentation, part of more effective branding strategies in general, but also to existing types of political culture amongst the electorate and to social, economic circumstances. In CDA terms, I discuss the “Băsescu brand” as involving choices at the level of discourse, genre and style; in pragma-dialectical terms, I view its success as partly the effect of successful strategic maneuvering. I also place the success of this brand within the Romanian context at the end of 2004, where often questionable populist electoral messages were perceived as reasonable and acceptable, as fitting adjustments to the situation and even as means of optimizing the deliberative situation of the electorate.
References (29)
References
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1996/1963. Cultura Civica. Atitudini politice si democratie în cinci natiuni. Budapest: CEU Press/Bucuresti: Editura Du Style.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowell, Tracy and Kemp, Gary. 2002. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans. H. van and Houtlosser, Peter. 2002. “Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Frans. H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds), 131—159, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodnight, Thomas. 1982. “The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public sphere deliberation.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 181: 214—227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ietcu, Isabela. 2004. Dialogicality and Ethical Perspective in Romanian Intellectual Discourse after 1989: A Study of H.-R. Patapievici. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.
. 2006a. Dialogue, Argumentation and Ethical Perspective in the Essays of H.-R. Patapievici. Bucuresti: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory: Analytical Framework and Applications. Bucuresti: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006c. “Argumentation, dialogue and conflicting moral economies in post-1989 Romania. An argument against the trade union movement.” Discourse and Society 17(5): 627—650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ietcu-Fairclough, Isabela. 2007. “Populism and the Romanian Orange Revolution: a discourse-analytical perspective on the presidential election of December 2004.” Studies in Language and Capitalism 2(1): 31—74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Legitimation and strategic maneuvering in the political field.” Argumentation 221: 399—417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionescu, Ghita and Gellner, Ernest. 1969. Populism. Its Meaning and Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionita, Sorin. 1998. “În numele poporului. Scurta analiza a populismului, ieri si azi.” In Doctrine politice. Concepte universale si realitati românesti, Alina Mungiu-Pippidi, (Ed.), 197—212. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 2002. “Messages, functional contexts, and categories of fallacy: Some dialectical and rhetorical considerations.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds), 119—130. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2007. “Populism as political communication style. An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research, 46 (3): 319—345, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. “Modality.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim Von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (Eds), 639—650. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The populist zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541—563. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2002 Politica dupa communism. Bucuresti: Humanitas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Bruce. 1999. The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2007. “The dynamics of right-wing populist argumentation in Austria.” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Argumentation, 1127:1134. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiles, Peter. 1969. “Populism. A syndrome, not a doctrine.” In Populism. Its Meaning and Characteristics, Ghita Ionescu and Ernest Gellner, 166—179. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, de Cillia, Rudolph, Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin. 1999. The Discursive Construction of Austrian National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Nartey, Mark & Ernanda
2020. Formulating emancipatory discourses and reconstructing resistance: a positive discourse analysis of Sukarno’s speech at the first Afro-Asian conference. Critical Discourse Studies 17:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Rheindorf, Markus
2019. Combining Analyses at Different Levels of Discourse. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Aiezza, Maria Cristina
2015. “We may face the risks” … “risks that could adversely affect our face.” A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of modality markers in CSR reports. Studies in Communication Sciences 15:1 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Milewicz, Chad M. & Mark C. Milewicz
2014. The Branding of Candidates and Parties: The U.S. News Media and the Legitimization of a New Political Term. Journal of Political Marketing 13:4 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. The Discursive Construction of Class and Lifestyle [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 75], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue