Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 7:1 (2008) ► pp.136–155
The limits of objective reporting
Published online: 26 May 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.07alm
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.07alm
The aim of this study is to scrutinize the assumption that objective reporting is good reporting, is ethical reporting. I do this by reflecting on different dimensions that are associated with the concept of objectivity: (1) accuracy; (2) truthfulness; (3) fairness and balance, and (4) moral neutrality. It is asserted that in many cases journalists are not objective in their reporting either because they consciously prefer not to be or because they are being manipulated by their sources. I close by asserting that the values of not harming others and respecting others should play a prominent part in the considerations of journalists. These are basic ethical standards that sometimes require normative reporting. Consequently, morally neutral coverage of hate speech and racism is a bad idea. It is a false and wrong conception. Subjectivity is preferable to objectivity when the media cover illiberal and anti-democratic phenomena.
Keywords: accuracy, balance, fairness, hate speech, moral neutrality, objectivity, racism, terror, truthfulness
References (79)
Abel, Richard L. 1998. Speaking Respect, Respecting Speech. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench. 1984. 19 C.C.C. (3d) 254.
Anderson, Douglas. 1987. How managing editors view and deal with ethical issues? Journalism Quarterly 641.
Blankenburg, William B., & Walden, Ruth. 1977. Objectivity, interpretation, and economy in reporting. Journalism Quarterly54.
Boeyink, David E. 1994. How effective are codes of ethics? A look at three newsrooms. Journalism Quarterly71.
Bunton, Kristie. 1998. Social responsibility in covering community: A narrative case analysis. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13(4).
Calloway, Larry. 2003. The lost compass of objectivity. Albuquerque Journal (December 14).
Caputo, John D. (Ed.). 1997. Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.
Cohen-Almagor, Raphael. 1994. The Boundaries of Liberty and Tolerance. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
. 2001. Ethical considerations in media coverage of hate speech in Canada. Review of Constitutional Studies 6(1).
. 2005. Media coverage of terror: Troubling episodes and suggested guidelines. Canadian Journal of Communication 30(3).
Condit, Celeste Michelle, & Selzer, J. Ann. 1985. The rhetoric of objectivity in the newspaper coverage of a murder trial. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2(3).
Cotler, Irwin. 2000. Holocaust denial, equality and harm: Boundaries of liberty and tolerance in a liberal democracy. In: Raphael Cohen-Almagor (Ed.). Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Tolerance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Durham, Meenakshi Gigi. 1998. On the relevance standpoint epistemology to the practice of journalism: The case for ‘strong objectivity’. Communication Theory 8(2).
Gabriele, Sandra. 2003. Politics and the American press: The rise of objectivity, 1865—1920. Canadian Journal of Communication 28(2). Available: http://www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=793
.
Glasser, Theodore L. 1984. Objectivity Precludes Responsibility. The Quill (February).
Glasser, Theodore L., & Ettema, James S. 1989. Investigative journalism and the moral order. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6(1).
Green, Bill. 1981. Janet’s world. The Washington Post (April 19).
Hackett, Robert A. 1984. Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1(3).
Hackett, Robert A., & Zhao, Yuezhi. 1998. Sustaining Democracy? Journalism and the Politics of Objectivity. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Herman, Edward S., & Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Vintage.
Hewitt, Christopher. 1992. Public’s perspectives. In: David L. Paletz and Alex P. Schmid (Eds). Terrorism and the Media. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hirst, Martin, & Roger Patching. 2005. Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1969. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishers.
Kaplan, Richard L. 2002. Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865—1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kariel, Herbert G., and Rosenvall, Lynn A. 1983. Cultural affinity displayed in Canadian daily newspapers. Journalism Quarterly 601.
. 2005. Is virtuous journalism possible? A critical overview of journalism ethics. In: Richard Keeble (Ed.). Print Journalism: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Kelly, Michael (Ed.). 1994. Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laitila, Tiina. 1995. Journalistic codes of ethics in Europe. European Journal of Communication 10(4).
Lloyd, John. 2003. Is that a fact? Financial Times (March 8).
Mahtani, Minelle. 2005. Gendered News Practices. In: Stuart Allan (Ed.). Journalism: Critical Issues. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Matsuda, Mari. 1989. Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan L. Rev. 871.
Merrill, John C. 1985. Is ethical journalism simply objective reporting? Journalism Quarterly 62(1—2).
Mill, J.S. 1948. Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government. London: J.M. Dent, Everyman’s edition.
Mindich, David T.Z. 1998. Just the Facts: How "Objectivity" Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
Moon, Richard. 1992. Drawing lines in a culture of prejudice: R. v. Keegstra and the restriction of hate propaganda. U.B.C. L. Rev.
. 2000. The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Moran, Mayo. 1994. Talking about hate speech: A rhetorical analysis of American and Canadian approaches to the Regulation of Hate Speech. Wisconsin L. Rev. 61.
Nagel, Thomas. 1980. The limits of objectivity. In: Sterling M. McMurrin (Ed.). The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Newman, Stephen (Ed.). 2004. Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States. New York: State University of New York Press.
R. v. Keegstra. 1990. S.C.J. No. 131.
Reese, Stephen D. 1990. The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A Socialist at the Wall Street Journal. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 71.
Rivers, William L., Schramm, Wilbur and Christians, Clifford G. 1980. Responsibility in Mass Communication. New York: Harper and Row.
Rosen, Jay. 1993. Beyond objectivity. Nieman Reports (Winter).
Schmid, A.P. 1989. Terrorism and the media: The ethics of publicity. Terrorism & Political Violence 1(4).
. 1990. Origins of the Ideal of Objectivity in the Professions. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
Stensaas, Harlan S. 1986. Development of the objectivity ethic in the U.S. daily newspapers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2(1).
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Tang, Rita, Yuming Fang & Emily K. Vraga
Park, Sohyun, Someen Park, Jaehoon Kim & Kyungsik Han
Peng, Altman Yuzhu, Chunyan Wu & Yu Sun
Benham, Janelle
Choi, Sujin
Choi, Sujin
Thomas, Ryan J.
Ikeanyibe, Okey Marcellus, Christian Chukwuebuka Ezeibe, Peter Oluchukwu Mbah & Chikodiri Nwangwu
McCaffrey, Raymond
Moges, Mulatu Alemayehu
Aucoin, James
Gerken, Fynn, Sarah F. Van der Land & Toni G.L.A. van der Meer
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
Ware, Jennifer, Geri Alumit Zeldes & Jennifer Hoewe
George, Cherian
Varghese, Mary & Kamila Ghazali
2014. Talking “race” through 1Malaysia in editorials. Journal of Language and Politics 13:3 ► pp. 453 ff.
Ardıç, Özgül, Jan Anne Annema & Bert van Wee
Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
Jakaza, Ernest
Jakaza, Ernest
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
