Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 7:1 (2008) ► pp.53–70
Language as social practice
Persian newspapers in post-revolutionary Iran
Published online: 26 May 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.03amo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.03amo
This paper aims to investigate the language used by newspapers in post-revolutionary Iran. More precisely, the paper sets out to analyze how such a language is deployed to represent relevant hegemonic ideologies. The approach adopted for this purpose draws inspiration mainly from critical linguistics, where it is hypothesized that, as far as the pertinent metadiscourse goes, media genres serve to activate and perpetuate social power relations. In keeping with this theoretical stance, the paper argues that socially constructed texts can be said to perform two complementary functions; on the one hand, they shed light on the realities experienced in social life; on the other, they reveal such aspects of those realities as are constructed through the use of language. It is thus in this context that the media language used in the post-revolutionary Iran lends itself to analytical investigation, where the available data reveal the co-existence of three competing discourse processes of ‘Islamization’, ‘Iranian Nationalism’ and ‘Western liberalism’, relating to the third stage development of post-revolutionary Iran.
References (25)
Amouzadeh M. 2002. Social realities in Persian advertising. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 121, 179—209.
. 2003. Symbolic value of English Language in Persian Advertising. International Journal of Communication 131, 197—222.
Amouzadeh M. & Tavangar M. 2004. Decoding pictorial metaphors: Ideologies in Persian advertisements. International Journal of Cultural Studies 7(2), 147—174.
. 2007. Sociolinguistic aspects of Persian advertising in the post-revolutionary Iran. In: Mehdi Sameti. (Ed.). Media, Culture, and Society in Iran: Living with Globalization and the Islamic State. London: Routledge, 130—151.
Fairclough N. & Wodak, R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: T.A. van Dijk. (Ed.). Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 65—84.
Halliday M.A.K. 1993. Language in a changing world. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. Occasional Paper Number 13.
House J. 2004. Explicitness in discourse across languages. In: J. House, W. Koller & K. Schubert. (eds). Neue Perspektiven in der Übesetzungs und Dolmetschwissenschaft. Festschrift für Heidi Gerzymisch-Arbogast. Bochum: AKS Verlag, 185—208.
Keshavarz M.H. 1988. Forms of address in Post-revolutionary Iranian Persian. Language in Society 171, 565—575.
McDonald K. 1991. Cultural innovation and economic modernization: The context of language education today. In: Frances Christie. (Ed.). Teaching English Literacy. Vol. 21. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, 1—16.
Sapir E. 1949. Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. Edited by David G. Mamdelbaum. Berkeley: University of California Press.
. 2006. Politics, ideology, and discourse. In: Keith Brown. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 91. Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier, 728—740.
Whorf B.L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Edited by John B. Carrol. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Abasi, Ali R. & Nahal Akbari
2013. The discoursal construction of candidates in the tenth Iranian presidential elections. Journal of Language and Politics 12:4 ► pp. 537 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
