Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:3 (2007) ► pp.475–501
Negatives and positives in the language of politics
Attitudes towards authority in the British and Chinese press
Published online: 15 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.12che
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.12che
An analytic model based on MAK Halliday’s System of Transitivity provides a powerful tool for decoding a journalist’s attitude to the events or individuals being written about. Chen (2005) showed how in the UK Times use of certain verbal processes rather than others to introduce direct or indirect speech could be an indicator that the journalist’s attitude towards the person being quoted was either negative or positive.
In this study, using a model for the linguistic comparison of the British and Chinese press developed by Chen (2004), verbal process use in the UK Times and the English-language China Daily is contrasted for evidence of differences in the attitude of British and Chinese journalists towards political figures.
The evidence is clear. Times journalists frequently use ‘negative’ verbal processes which indicate doubt or scepticism towards the person being quoted. China Daily journalists, meanwhile, more often use ‘positive’ verbal processes which enhance the authority of the speaker.
Keywords: Media, verbal process, authority, attitudes, China, Halliday, Transitivity
References (19)
Chen, L. 2004. Evaluation in media texts: A cross-cultural linguistic investigation. Language in Society 33 (5), 673–702.
. 2005. Transitivity in media texts: Negative verbal process sub-functions and narrator bias. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43 (1), 33–51.
Chen L. 2007. Analysing Attitude: Positive Verbal Process sub-functions and Media Bias./ RASK, International Journal of Language and Communication 251, 25–55.
Conley, J and Tripoli, S. 1992. Changes of line at ‘China Daily’: Fluctuating party policy or fluctuating control? In: R. Porter (Ed.). 1992 Reporting the News from China. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Curran, J. 1977. Capitalism and Control of the Press, 1800–1975. In: J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Woollacott (eds). 1977. Mass Communication and Society. Clevedon: Open University Press, 195–226.
Gurevitch, M and Blumler, J.G. 1977. Linkages between the mass media and politics: A model for the analysis of political communications systems. In: J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Wool-lacott (eds). 1977. Mass Communication and Society. Clevedon: Open University Press.
Hall, S. 1977. Culture, the Media and the ‘Ideological Effect’. In: J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Woollacott (eds). 1977. Mass Communication and Society. Clevedon: Open University Press.
Jamieson, K. and Kohrs Campbell, K. 1992. The Interplay of Influence. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Knight, A. and Nakano, Y (eds). 1999. Reporting Hong Kong: Foreign Media and the Handover. Richmond, UK: Curzon.
Lee, C.C. 1990. Mass media: Of China, about China. In: C.C. Lee (Ed.). 1990. Voices of China: The Interplay of Politics and Journalism. London: Guildford Press.
Li, G. 1999. Review of the Development of Press in China. Ming Pao Monthly111. HongKong: MingPao, 96–103.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Wang, Xi & Xiaoyu Sun
Li, Jiayu
2021. US-China trade negotiation discourses in the press. Journal of Language and Politics 20:6 ► pp. 932 ff.
Gates Tapia, Anna M. & Douglas Biber
2014. Lexico-grammatical stance in Spanish news reportage. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 208 ff.
Tjondro, Michelle
Chen, Lily
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.