Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:3 (2007) ► pp.401–418
Investigating language and ideology
A presentation of the ideological square and transitivity in the editorials of three Kenyan newspapers
Published online: 15 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.07mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.07mat
This article examines the application of two approaches from discourse analysis, that is, the ideological square from Critical Discourse Analysis and transitivity which is a component of Systemic Functional Grammar in the analysis of data extracted from the Kenyan print media. These two approaches are used to illustrate how different newspapers’ editorials portrayed various political groups in the run — up to the general elections in 1997 in Kenya. Thus attempts are made to show the role of newspapers editorials in articulating conflicting ideological positions in election reporting. In this paper an analysis is provided on how the Kenya print media represented and constructed political parties in the 1997 elections. The aim of this representation and construction is to show how political groups in the sense of us vs them and the representational processes of transitivity construct ideological discourse. The paper further illustrates how the concepts of ideological square and transitivity assist in making overt the mediation processes and practices that are generally, covertly, often unconsciously used in the construction and evaluation of participants in a political process.
Keywords: Ideology, Ideological square, transitivity, editorials, Kenya
References (28)
Ajulu, R. 1997. Kenya’s 1992 Elections and its Implications for Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Braamfontein: The Ford Foundation for Global Dialogue.
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
Foeken, D. and T. Dietz. 2000. Of ethnicity, manipulation and observation: The 1992 and 1997 elections in Kenya. In: J. Abbink and G. Hesseling (eds). 2000. Election Observation and Democratization in Africa. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 122–149.
Fowler, R and Kress, G. 1979. Critical Linguistics. In: R. Fowler and G. Kress and T. Trew (eds). 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, 185–213.
Hammersley, M. 1997. On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Language and communication 17 (3), 237–248.
Matu, P.M. 2003. A critical discourse analysis of newspaper reporting of the run-up to the 1997 Kenyan general election. Bloemfontein: Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of the Free State.
Menz, F. 1989. Manipulation strategies in newspapers: A program for critical linguistics. In: R. Wodak (Ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–249.
Mesthrie, R. 2000. Critical sociolinguistics: Approaches to language and power. In: R. Mesthrie, J. Swann, A. Deumert and W.L. Leap (eds). 2000. Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 316–353.
Ogot, B.A. 1995a. The politics of populismIn.B.A. Ogot and W.R. Ochieng (eds). 1995. Decolonization and Independence in Kenya. London: James Currey Ltd., 187–213.
. 1995b. Transition from single-party to multi-party political system. In: B.A. Ogot and W.R. Ochieng (eds). 1995. Decolonization and Independence in Kenya. London: James Currey Ltd., 239–261.
Oktar, L. 2001. The ideological representation of representational processes in the representation of us and them. Discourse and Society
12 (3), 313–346.
Rutten, M. 2000. The Kenyan general elections of 1997: Implementing a new model for international election observation in Africa. In: J. Abbink and G. Hesseling (eds). 2000. Election Observation and Democratization in Africa. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 295–320.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W.G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds). 1979. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monteray, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33–47.
Thetela, P. 2001. Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC’s military intervention in Lesotho. Discourse and Society 12 (3), 347–370.
Trew, T. 1979. What the papers say: linguistic and ideological difference. In: R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
Van Dijk, T.A. 1987. Introduction. In: I.M. Zavala, T.A. Van Dijk and M. Diaz-Diocaretz (eds). 1987. Approaches to Discourse, Poetics and Psychiatry. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Liu, Feifei, Wei He & Michele Zappavigna
El-Astal, Mohammed & Abdulaziz Al-Mutawa
Floranti, Astri Dwi, Yasir Mubarok, Aceng Ruhendi Saifullah & Wawan Gunawan
Pollak, Senja, Roel Coesemans, Walter Daelemans & Nada Lavrač
2022. Detecting contrast patterns in newspaper articles by combining discourse analysis and text mining. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 647 ff.
Li, Jiayu
2021. US-China trade negotiation discourses in the press. Journal of Language and Politics 20:6 ► pp. 932 ff.
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
Ghauri, Muhammad Junaid & Salma Umber
Ehineni, Taiwo Oluwaseun
Lanvers, Ursula & James A. Coleman
Moshe, Mira
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
