Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:3 (2007) ► pp.351–375
Presuppositions and strategic functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 speech
A critical discourse analysis
Published online: 15 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz
This paper provides a critical discourse analysis of presuppositions and strategic functions, in addition to brief comments on the use of propaganda devices in the speech delivered by George W. Bush nine days after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and some other US targets, September 11, 2001. This approach makes it possible to explore the tension between idealism and pragmatism, the conflict between ‘us’ and ‘them’, and the other aspects of ideologies and power relationships found in the speech.
References (101)
Barber, B. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World. New York: Ballantine Books.
. 2004. Compressing democracy’s timelines. Accessed Jan. 27, 2005. http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=3799
Beaver, D. I. 1997. Presupposition. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds). The Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 939–1008.
Bostdorff, D. and Goldzwig, S. 1994. Idealism and pragmatism in American foreign policy rhetoric: The case of John F. Kennedy and Vietnam. Presidential Studies Quarterly 241, 515–540.
Brooks, R. 2003. Bush dominates a nation of victims. Accessed Jan. 29, 2005. http://www.alter-net.org/story/16243/
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1972. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: P. P. Giglioli (Ed.). 1972. Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 252–282.
Bush, G. 2001. Bush Address to Congress. Accessed Nov. 13, 2001. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920—8.html
. 2005. President Sworn-In to Second Term. Accessed Jan. 20, 2005. http://www.white-house.gov/
Caffi, C. 1993. Pragmatic presupposition. In: R.E. Asher (Ed.). An Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 3320–3327.
Calvo, C. 1994. Why They Were in the Gulf: A Discourse Analysis of Bush’s Newsweek Letter. Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA)’s Occasional Papers No. 7. http://www.pala.ac.uk/op/Paper07.doc
Carter, R. (Ed.). 1982. Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics. London: Allen and Unwin.
Chapman, S. and Routledge, C. 1999The pragmatics of detection: Paul Auster’s City of Glass. Language and Literature 8 (3), 241–253.
Chiapello, E. and Fairclough, N. 2002. Understanding the new management ideology: A trans-disciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse and Society 13 (2), 185–208.
Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Chilton. P. and Schäffner, C. 1997. Discourse and politics. In: T.A. van Dijk (Ed.). 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. London and New Delhi: Sage. 206–230.
Cline, A. R. 2002. President Declares ‘Freedom at War with Fear.’ Accessed Jan 20, 2005. http://election.rhetorica.net/bush/terrorism_congress.htm
Colson, C. 2002. Drawing the Battle Lines: we need to be informed and discerning about the Islamic worldview. Christianity Today 461, 80.
Docherty, J. 2001. Revisiting the war metaphor. Accessed Nov. 13, 2001. http://www.emu.edu/ctp/bse-metaphor2.html
Douglas, S. 2001. Oedipus in Manhattan: The blind report to the blind. Accessed Nov. 13,2001. http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/25/24/douglas2524.html
Dubois, J. et al.. 1994. Larousse Dictionnaire de Linguistique et des Sciences de Langage. Paris: Larousse.
Engel, D. 2004. Modelling Self and Other: A Hybrid Approach to the Analysis of Images of Self and Other in the Radio Addresses Delivered by the American President Before and After 9/11. Salzburg: Salzburg University.
Fairclough, N. 2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: T. A. van Dijk (Ed.). 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. London and New Delhi: Sage, 285–284.
Fetzer, A. 2007. “Well if that had been true, that would have been perfectly reasonable”: Appeals to reasonableness in political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 391, 1342–1359.
Flowerdew, J. 2004. Identity politics and Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty: analysing the discourse of Hong Kong’s first Chief Executive. Journal of Pragmatics 361, 1551–1578.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. 1979. Language and Control. London and New York: Routledge.
Fowler, R. and Kress, G. 1979. Critical linguistics. In: R. Fowler et al.. 1979. Language and Control. London and New York: Routledge, 185–213.
Gamson, W. A. and Herzog, H. 2007. Living with contradictions: The taken-for-granted in Israeli political discourse. Political Psychology 20 (2), 247–266.
Greco, S. 2003. When presupposing becomes dangerous: How the procedure of presuppositional accommodation can be exploited in manipulative discourses. SCOMS (Studies in Communication Sciences) 3 (2), 217–234.
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds). 1975. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
. 1991. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In: Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 269–82.
Harb, O. El-Ghazali. 2001. The trouble with America. Al-Ahram Weekly(Dec. 27—Jan. 2), 13.
Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Jones, G. 1979. The ideology of middle management. In: R. Fowler et al.. 1979. Language and Control. London and New York: Routledge, 81–91.
Huckin, T. N. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: T. Miller (Ed.). Functional Approaches to Written Text. Accessed August 15, 2007. http://exchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pubs/BR/functionalsec3_6.htm
Ilie, C. 1998. The ideological remapping of semantic roles in totalitarian discourse, or, how to paint white roses red. Discourse and Society 91, 57–80.
Jackson, R. 2007. Constructing enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in political and academic discourse. Government and Opposition 42 (3), 394–426.
Jones, P. E. 2006. Why there is no such thing as “critical discourse analysis”? Lang. Commun, doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2006.08.001
Kakmi, D. 2001. Viewpoints: America serves its own interests. Middle East Times(Dec. 8—14), 5.
Kempson, R. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramarae, C., Schulz, M. and O’Barr, W. M. 1984. Introduction: Toward an understanding of language and power. In: C. Kramarae et al.. (eds). 1984. Language and Power. London and New Delhi: Sage, 9–22.
Kramarae, C., Schulz, M. and Barr, W. M. (eds). 1984. Language and Power. London and New Delhi: Sage.
Lakoff, G. 1991. Metaphor in Politics. Accessed Jan 23, 2005. http://philosophy.uoregon.edu/metaphor/lakoff-l.htm
. 1994. Conceptual Metaphor Homepage. Accessed Jan 23, 2005. http://cogsci.berkeley.edu/MetaphorHome.html
. 2001. Metaphors of terror. Accessed Jan 23, 2005. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/News/911lakoff.html
Lye, J. 1997. Ideology: A brief guide. Accessed Jan 23, 2005. http://www.brocku.ca/english/jlye/ideology.html
Maddox, G. 2003. The “Crusade” against evil: Bush’s fundamentalism. The Australian Journal of Politics and History 49 (3), 398–420.
Mazid, B. M. 1999. Ideology and Control in some Speech and Newspaper Genres: A Politico-linguistic Approach to Discourse Analysis. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University.
. 2003. “Sharp wits and fine phrases”: Euphemism and dysphemism in the war-on-Iraq discourse. Cairo Studies in English. Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Cairo University, April 2003: 43–84.
Miller, J. 1998. Interview with Osama bin Laden. Accessed Feb. 7, 2004. http://www.pbs.org
Orend, B. D. 2000. War. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed Feb. 5, 2003. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/
Piazza, R. 2006. The representation of conflict in the discourse of Italian melodrama. Journal of Pragmatics 381, 2087–2104.
Reunions, E. 2004a. Biblical promise and threat in U.S. imperialist rhetoric before and after September 11, 2001. The Scholar and Feminist Online 2 (2): Reverberations: On Violence. Accessed Feb 17, 2005. www.barnard.edu/sfonline
. 2004b. Desiring war. The Bible and Critical Theory 1(1). Accessed Nov. 12, 2004. http://publications.epress.monash.edu/toc/bc/1/1
Sbisà, M. 1999. Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. InJ. Verschueren (Ed.). 1999. Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 1. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, 492–509.
Short, M. 1989. Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. In: R. Carter and P. Simpson (eds.). 1989. Language, Discourse and Literature. London: Unwin Hyman, 139–168.
Simons, M. 2003. Presupposition and accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian picture. Philosophical Studies 1121, 251–278.
Stalnaker, R. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In: M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds). 1974 Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, 197–213.
. 1978. Assertion. In: P. Cole (Ed.). 1978. Pragmatics: Syntax and Semantics 9. New York: Academic Press, 315–332.
Thomas, J. 1985. The language of power: Toward a dynamic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics91, 765–783.
Thompson, J. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. California: Stanford University Press.
Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. (eds). 1983. Language, Gender, and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
Van Dijk, T.A. 1984. Prejudice in Discourse. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
. (Ed.) 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 41: Discourse Analysis in Society. London and New York: Academic Press.
. 1997. Discourse as interaction in society. In: T.A. van Dijk (Ed.). 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. London and New Delhi: Sage, 1–36.
. 1998b. Categories for the critical analysis of parliamentary debates about immigration. Accessed Jan. 20, 2005. http://www.hum.uva.nl/teun/categor2.htm
. 2005. War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. In: L. Chouliaraki (Ed.). 2005. The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and Community in Iraq War Discourses. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–91.
Van Wormer, K. 2002. “Dry Drunk” Syndrome and George W. Bush. Accessed Nov. 12, 2004. http://www.counterpunch.org/wormer1011.html
Victoria, E. 2002. A critical analysis of President George W. Bush’s State of the Union Address. Accessed Dec. 15, 2004. http://www.freedomwriter.com/issue27/am1.htm
Wodak, R. (Ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2002. Friend or foe: the defamation or legitimate and necessary criticism? Reflections on recent political discourse in Austria. Language and Communication 221, 495–517.
. 2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition 151, 203–225.
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Tyrkkö, Jukka, Sophie Raineri, Jenni Räikkönen, Alžběta Budirská, Mai Nabawy & Amanda Silfver
Hamed, Dalia M.
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid & Mahdieh Noori
2019. Discursive portrayal of Islam as “a part of America’s story” in Obama’s presidential speeches. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 915 ff.
Tarish, Abbas Hussein
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
2017. Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria. Journal of Language and Politics 16:5 ► pp. 706 ff.
Abid, Raith Zeher & Shakila Abdul Manan
2016. Constructing the “self” and the “other” in Bush’s political discourse before and after the Iraq war (2002–2008). Journal of Language and Politics 15:6 ► pp. 710 ff.
Fischbacher-Smith, Denis
Kim,Kwee-Soon
Dunmire, Patricia L.
Sahlane, Ahmed
Flowerdew, John & Solomon Leong
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
Gavriely‐Nuri, Dalia
Jones, Jason
Moshe, Mira
Mazid, Bahaa-Eddin M.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
