Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:1 (2007) ► pp.29–50

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Welfare or workfare?

Partisan re/constructions of Finnish unemployment security in the era of retrenchment

Published online: 13 June 2007
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.04nyg
The aim of the article is to analyse changing partisan constructions of unemployment security in Finland during the 1990s. In the article, a corpus of 143 texts comprising partisan statements on un/employment policies is analysed by using Perelman’s (1971/1958) rhetorical design. The focus lies on how the leading parties interpreted state responsibility for labour market failures, the nature of social rights for unemployed persons, and the generosity of unemployment benefits. Were there major reformulations of unemployment security as a reaction to high unemployment, fiscal problems and globalisation? And if so, what kinds of rhetorical argumentation were used in order to legitimate these reformulations? The results show that partisan constructions of unemployment benefits changed in a contractual and reciprocal direction, indicating that elements of so-called workfare rhetoric became rooted in the Finnish political discourse during the Mid-90s. The political elites also moved closer to a narrower interpretation of the concept of social right for unemployed.
References (40)
References
Allen, James P. and Scruggs, Lyle. 2004. Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3), 496–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Torben M. 2004. Challenges to the Scandinavian welfare model. European Journal of Political Economy 20 (3), 743–754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergström, Göran and Boréus, Kristina 2000. Textens mening och makt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano 2001. Political institutions, veto points and the process of welfare state adaptation. In: P. Pierson (ed). 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 238–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith and Tanenbaum, Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 945—1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1953. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crosswhite, James. 1989. Universality in rhetoric: Perelman’s universal audience. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (3), 157–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cousins, Mel. 2005. European Welfare States. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun van. 1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob 1995. Perelman and the fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (2), 122–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Phil. 1999. Critical systems theory. A political economy of language, thought, and technology. Communication Research 26 (4), 482–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julkunen, Raija. 2001. Suunnanmuutos. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kangas, Olli. 1986. Luokkaintressit ja hyvinvointivaltio. Helsinki: Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja D-84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kildal, Nanna. 2000. En ny väg för välfärdsstaten? In: Nanna Kildal (ed). Den nya sociala frågan om arbete, inkomst och rättvisa. Göteborg: Daidalos, 7–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries 1975—1995. American Political Science Review 97 (3), 425–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1995. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NOSOCO. 2003. Social protection in the Nordic countries 2001. Scope, expenditure and financing. The Nordic social-statistical committee. Copenhagen: NOSOSCO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nygård, Mikael. 2003. Välfärdsstaten, partierna och marknaden. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nygård, Mikael and Paajaste, Kai 2001. Retorik som det möjligas konst. Rhetorica Scandinavica 19/20011, 21–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm. 1996. Retoriikan valtakunta. (orig. L’Empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation [1977]). Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olrechts-Tyteca, Lucie 1971. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. (orig. Traité de l’argumentation — la nouvelle rhétorique [1958]). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In: Paul Pierson (ed). The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 80–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosengren, Mats 1998. Doxa och den nya retorikens kunskapssyn. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 8/19981: 10–17Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Fiona. 2000. Beyond left and right: The new partisan politics of welfare. Governance 13 (2), 155–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. 2002. Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies 35 (2), 168–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2000. Economic changes, vulnerabilities, and institutional capabilities. In: Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien Schmidt (eds). 2000. Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Summa, Hilkka. 1996. Kolme näkökulmaa uuteen retoriikkaan Burke, Perelman, Toulmin ja retoriikan kunnianpalautus. In: Kari Palonen and Hilkka Summa (eds). 1996. Pelkää retoriikkaa. Tampere: Vastapaino, 51–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swank, Duane 2005. Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state retrenchment in capitalist democracies. Social Policy & Society 4 (2), 183–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter. 2004. Open markets and welfare values. European Societies 6 (1), 29–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The politics of welfare in Europe. In: Peter Taylor-Taylor (ed). Welfare States under Pressure. London: Sage, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timonen, Virpi. 2003. Restructuring the Welfare State. Globalisation and Social Policy Reform in Finland and Sweden. Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. Workfare with welfare: Recent reforms of the Danish welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy 9 (1), 5–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth. 2003 (eds). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. New York: Basingstoke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Panagl, Oscar. 2004. Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren in transdisziplinären Vergleich. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Stewart. 2001. Labour Market Regimes under Threat? In: Paul Pierson (ed). 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 368–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tarkiainen, Laura
2020. ‘Effortful’, ‘needy’ and ‘freeloader’. Journal of Language and Politics 19:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue