Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:1 (2007) ► pp.7–28
The discursive dynamics of neo-liberal consensus
Irish broadsheet editorials and the privatization of Eircom
Published online: 13 June 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.03phe
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.03phe
The stock market floatation of Telecom Eireann (the soon to be renamed Eircom) in July 1999 was, and remains, “the biggest privatization in the history of the Irish state”. Through the application of a critical discourse analysis framework (Chouliaraki and Fairclough 1999; Fairclough 2003), this article examines editorial discourse both before and after the company’s initially ‘successful’ floatation in six Irish broadsheet newspapers. The different editorial stances are analyzed in terms of the authority of three key neo-liberal assumptions: that the full privatization of the company is desirable; that the notion of direct state involvement in a modern Telecoms market is archaic; and that public participation in the stock market should be encouraged. The article suggests that while the evidence illustrates a context of neo-liberal hegemony, the ideological authority of neo-liberalism should not be understood in undifferentiated, monolithic terms, as the evidence points to a plurality of neo-liberal discourses and styles, which can be partly understood in terms of the ‘media field’ identity of the different newspapers.
References (31)
Aune, James Arnt. 2001. Selling the Free Market: The Rhetoric of Economic Correctness. New York: Guilford Press.
Beaud, Michel and Dostaler, Gillies. 1997. Economic Thought since Keynes: A History and Dictionary of Major Economists. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loic. 2001. Commentary: “NewLiberalSpeak”: Notes on the New Planetary Vulgate. Radical Philosophy 1051, 2–5.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. England: Polity Press.
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Coulter, Colin and Coleman, Steve (eds). 2003. The End of Irish History? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Eilders, Christiane and Lüter, Albrecht. 2000. Germany at war: Competing framing strategies in German public discourse. European Journal of Communication 15 (3), 415–428.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication 43 (4), 51–58.
Frank, Thomas. 2001. One Market under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy. London: Secker and Warburg.
Kirby, Peadar. 2002. The Celtic Tiger in Distress: Growth with Inequality in Ireland. Great Britain: Palgrave.
Kirby, Peadar, Gibbons, Luke and Cronin, Michael (eds). 2002. Reinventing Ireland: Culture, Society and the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press.
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal 2001 (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
McManus, John. 2001. O”Reilly stake in Valentia to be kept under wraps. The Irish Times, 12 June 2001
Philips, Lynne. 1998. Introduction: Neoliberalism in Latin America. In: Lynne Phillips (ed). 1998. The Third Wave of Modernization in Latin America: Cultural Perspectives on Neoliberalism. Deleware: Scholarly Resources, xi–xxiv.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Watanabe, Hideo
Weeks, Samuel
2021.
Langue de bois, or, discourse in defense of an offshore financial center. Journal of Language and Politics 20:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Graham, Ciara & Brendan K. O’Rourke
Liu, Ming
2017. “Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberalism”. Journal of Language and Politics 16:2 ► pp. 242 ff.
Raeijmaekers, Danielle & Pieter Maeseele
Raeijmaekers, Daniëlle & Pieter Maeseele
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
