Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 5:3 (2006) ► pp.449–471

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Language and significance — or the importance of import

Implications for critical discourse analysis
Many thanks — with the usual disclaimers — to Norman and Isabela Fairclough and Ruth Wodak for comments on an earlier draft.

 | Lancaster University
Published online: 8 December 2006
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.5.3.10say
One of the main functions of discourses is to impute significance to, or interpret the significance of, things. Claims about significance are not merely expressive or evaluative but informative or descriptive, often referring to matters bearing on well-being or flourishing. It is argued that critical discourse analysis (CDA) can hardly be critical unless it acknowledges and evaluates how discourses impute and interpret significance or import and how this relates to well-being. Critical thought in contemporary social science is undermined by dualisms such as fact/value, reason/emotion, and positive/normative, which tend to position critique as ‘merely subjective’ and beyond the scope of reason or science. Although, like any critical social science, CDA uses terms like ‘oppression’, ‘racism’, ‘abuse’, ‘exploitation’ and ‘suffering’, these cannot be reduced wholly to either positive or normative matters. The paper shows how significance can be understood by challenging these dualisms.
References (36)
References
Archer, Margaret S. 1996. 2nd ed. Culture and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Being Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collier, Andrew. 2003. In Defence of Objectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2003. After Theory. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005 Analyzing values in texts: The contribution of Critical Discourse Analysis to researching moral economies. Draft paper.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Michel Foucault: Ethics. ed. Paul Rabinow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Philip. 2001. Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in a new political economy. Discourse and Society12(6), 761–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Critical discourse analysis and evaluative meaning: interdisciplinarity as a critical turn. In: G. Weiss and R. Wodak. (eds). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 108–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haines, Simon. 1998. Deepening the self. In: Jane Adamson, Richard Freadman and David Parker (eds). Renegotiating Ethics in Literature, Philosophy and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helm, Bennett W. 2001. Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1991. The Market Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 1995. Textual Politics. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1971 Against the Self-Images of the Age. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. C. 1993. Charles Taylor: explanation and practical reason. In: Amartya Sen and Martha C. Nussbaum (eds). The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 232–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Kanavilil. 2004. On being critical. Critical Discourse Studies 1(2), 261–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1984[1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1967. Neutrality and political science. In: Alan Ryan (ed.). 1973. The Philosophy of Social Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soper, Kate. 1995. What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2000. The construction of purpose in discourse. In: Srikant Sarangi and Michael Coulthard (eds). Discourse and Social Life. London: Longman, 66–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volosinov, Valentin N. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1993. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

McCaig, Melanie, Davar Rezania & Rozita Dara
2022. Is the Internet of Things a helpful employee? An exploratory study of discourses of Canadian farmers. Internet of Things 17 ► pp. 100466 ff. DOI logo
Sayer, Andrew & Jamie Morgan
2022. A realist journey through social theory and political economy: an interview with Andrew Sayer. Journal of Critical Realism 21:4 ► pp. 434 ff. DOI logo
Fairclough, Norman
2016. Metapragmatics, Hidden Assumptions, and Moral Economy. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Lynch, K & M Ivancheva
2016. Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: a critical ethical analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 15:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Bennett, Joe
2014. Avoiding emotivism: A sociolinguistic approach to moral talk. Language & Communication 39 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Heimans, Stephen
2012. Coming to matterinpractice: enacting education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 33:2 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Lynch, Kathleen
2010. Carelessness: A hidden doxa of higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9:1 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Lynch, Kathleen
2010. Lessons for higher education: the university as a site of activism. British Journal of Sociology of Education 31:5 ► pp. 575 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2009. Pragmatique et Critical Discourse Analysis : un exemple d'une analyse à la croisée des disciplines. Semen 27 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Bar-Lev, Zev
2007. Reframing Moral Politics . Journal of Language and Politics 6:3 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 62], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Speaking for the Nation [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 88], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue