Article published In: Critical Linguistic Perspectives on Coping with Traumatic Pasts: Case studies
Edited by Christine Anthonissen and Jan Blommaert †
[Journal of Language and Politics 5:1] 2006
► pp. 71–96
Critical discourse analysis as an analytic tool in considering selected, prominent features of TRC testimonies
Published online: 14 April 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.5.1.05ant
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.5.1.05ant
This paper considers a number of salient, characterising features of the verbal mediation process that took place in the TRC hearings on gross human rights violations. This is done with reference to the methodology developed in Discourse Sociolinguistics. It considers how various participants represent a particular event, each taking the perspective from which they experienced it. It notes the differences in verbal choice, and in textual and information structure of (i.a.) a journalist who witnessed this particular instance of public police excess, of a woman involved because her home was at the scene of the confrontation between police and youngsters, of one of the commanding police officers who had been subpoenaed and thus was not a voluntary witness at the hearing, of a doctor who treated patients after the event, of a school teacher who could articulate the particular kind of protest youngsters engaged in at the time, and so on. It also highlights a particular practice of reformulating which appears to be typical of discourses that mediate past atrocities with a view to founding new and improved democratic practices.
References (34)
Crocker, D. A. 2000. Truth commissions, transitional justice, and civil society. In: R. I. Rotberg and D. D (eds). Truth v. Justice - The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 99—121.
Du Toit, Andre. 2000. The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgement and justice as recognition. In: R. I. Rotberg, and D. D (eds). Truth v. Justice - The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 122—140.
Fowler, R., Kress, G., Hodge, R. and Trew, T. 1979. Language and Control. London: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul.
Matouschek, B., Wodak, R. and Januschek, F. 1995. Notwendige Maßnahmen gegen Fremde? Genese und Formen von rassistischen Diskursen der Differenz. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Muntigl, P., Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. 2000. European Union Discourses on Un/employment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pope, R. 1995. Textual Intervention - Critical and Creative Strategies for Literature Studies. London, New York: Routledge.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination - Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London, New York: Routledge.
Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds). 2000. Truth v. Justice - The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Swartz, L. 1996. Culture and mental health in the rainbow nation: Transcultural psychiatry in a changing South Africa. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review 33(2,) 119—136.
Swartz L. 1998. Culture and Mental Health: A Southern African View. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Titscher, S., Wodak, R., Meyer, M. and Vetter, E. 1998. Methoden der Textanalyse: Leitfaden und Überblick. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak,R., and Vetter, R. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Transl. B. Jenner. London: Sage.
. 1984. Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) 1985. Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wodak, R. and Matouschek, B. 1993. We are dealing with people whose origins one can clearly tell just by looking: Critical discourse analysis and the study of neoracism in contemporary Austria. Discourse and Society 2(4,) 225—248.
Wodak, R., Menz, F., Mitten, R. and Stern, F. 1994. Die Sprachen der Vergangenheiten. Frankfurt aM: Suhrkamp.
Wodak, R., Nowak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., DeCillia, R. and Mitten, R. 1990. Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Wodak, R. (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Website for transcripts of hearings: http://www.doj.gov.za/trc/trc_frameset.htm
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Zúñiga, Marcela Ruiz & Antonia Torres Agüero
Anthonissen, Christine
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2017. Butas a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Pragmatics and Society 8:3 ► pp. 400 ff.
Ruiz, Marcela & Oriana Bernasconi
Unuabonah, Foluke O.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
