Article published In: Communicating/Doing Politics
[Journal of Language and Politics 3:3] 2004
► pp. 485–505
“Clean and green — That’s the way we like it”
Greening a country, building a nation
Published online: 7 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.07teo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.07teo
This paper focuses on the discursive strategies used by the Singapore government to construct national identity and solidarity on the basis of a ‘clean and green’ environment. By analysing the slogans used in the Clean and Green Week campaign in terms of the use of pronouns and the pragmatic notion of ‘politeness’, the paper shows that the people of Singapore are not only persuaded to ‘buy’ the idea of environmentalism, but also to buy into the ideology of national identity and unity being derived (in part) from the proper management and conservation of Singapore’s scarce resources and limited physical space. The paper concludes with a discussion on how national campaigns such as the Clean and Green Week constitutes a form of political discourse, where public educational discourse becomes a veiled medium through which socio-political ideologies are produced and propagated. With the government treading the fine line between information and manipulation where ‘greening’ a country becomes a scaffolding for building a nation, a study like this offers interesting insights into the interplay between the language of politics and the politics of language.
Keywords: national campaigns, environment, political discourse, slogans, Singapore
References (16)
Bowers, J.W. and Ochs, Donovan J. 1971. The Rhetoric of Agitation and Control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickason, R. 2000. British Television Advertising: Cultural Identity and Communication. Luton: University of Luton Press.
Hill, M. and Lian, K. F. 1995. The Politics of Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore. Routledge: London.
Kasper, G. 1998. Politeness. In: J. L., Mey (ed.). Concise Encyclopaedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Pergamon, 677–684.
Kotler, P. and Roberto, E. L.1989. Strategies for Changing Public Behaviour. New York: The Free Press.
Lazar, M. M. 2000. Gender, discourse and semiotics: The politics of parenthood representations. Discourse and Society 11(3), 373–400.
Stewart et al. 1995. The Persuasive Functions of Slogans. In: R. Jackall (ed.). Propaganda. London: Macmillan Press, 400–422.
Teo, P. 2002. Sloganising Singapore: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Campaign Slogans in Singapore. Unpublished PhD thesis. Lancaster University.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Ernanda & Mark Nartey
Huynh, Lam Thi Mai, Jie Su & Alexandros Gasparatos
Cho, Tambin & Jeong-Hann Pae
Williams, Jamie & David Wright
Ho, Victor
2022. Strategic use of nouns and pronouns in public discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 51 ff.
Xu, Huimin & Csilla Weninger
Montefrio, Marvin Joseph F., Xin Run Lee & Elwin Lim
Han, Heejin
Ho, Victor & Amy Suen
Wang, Jiayu
2016. Narrative mediatisation of the “Chinese Dream” in Chinese and American media. Journal of Language and Politics 15:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Wang, Jiayu
Teo, Peter & Cui Ruiguo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
