Article published In: Communicating/Doing Politics
[Journal of Language and Politics 3:3] 2004
► pp. 441–462
The metaphors of globalization and trade
An analysis of the language used in the WTO
Published online: 7 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.05gha
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.05gha
This research project examined the metaphors of Globalization and trade in the context of current asymmetries prevailing between high- and low-income countries. As a theoretical underpinning we used historical discourse analysis which views language as a social activity through which humans conceive and understand the reality they live in. Metaphors in particular provide speakers with an inventory of comparisons and pictures. Metaphors offer the discourse its down-to-earth shading and help in this way to secure one specific perspective on reality. How this is being done in the WTO system is demonstrated in the empirical part of the article. Metaphors on Globalization and trade were extracted from face-to-face interviews with WTO staff and trade diplomats of low-income African countries. These metaphors were analyzed with respect to their force in making trade ‘speakable’, and by doing so providing the one particular view on Globalization that hardly leaves any space for alternative considerations.
Keywords: globalization, metaphors, trade, Africa
References (47)
Balzac, Honoré de. 1946. Scènes de la Vie de Province: le lys dans la vallée, [1871–80]. Paris: La Nouvelle France.
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The social Construction of Reality, A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London/Plymouth: Penguin.
Blackhurst, Richard, Lyakuwa, Bill and Oyejide, Ademola. 2000. Options for improving Africa’s participation in the WTO. The World Economy 231, 500–511.
Bourdieu Pierre. 1982. Ce que Parler Veut Dire, l’Économie des Échanges Linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.
Cameron, Jenny. 2003. Feminizing the Economy: Metaphors, Strategies, Politics. The Australian National University: Draft Manuscript.
Chabal, Patrick and Deloz, Jean Pascal (eds). 1999. Africa works: Disorder as Political Instrument. Oxford/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Chambers, Jain and Curti, Lidia (eds). 1998(1996). The Post-Colonial Question. Common Skies, Divided Horizons. London/New York: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul and Lakoff, George. 1995. Foreign policy by metaphor. In: Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden (eds). Language and Peace. Aldershot/Brookfield/Singapore/Sydney: Dartmouth, 38–60.
Chulsu, Kim. 1999. Fifty years of the GATT/WTO system: Major achievements and future challenges. In: Kong Il Sa and Kim Kwang Suk (eds). The Fifty Years of the GATT/WTO: Past Performances and Future Challenges. Korea/Seoul: Institute of Global Economics, 5–30.
Clive, Thomas. 2000. Globalization as paradigm shift. Responses from the south. In: Ben Dennis and Kenneth Hell (eds). Globalization: A Calculus of Inequality. Perspectives from the South. Jamaica: Jan Randle Kingston, 41-67.
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les Mots et Les Choses, Une Archéologie des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
. 1993 (Paris 1969) The Archeology of Knowledge and Discourse on Language. London/New York: Barnes/Noble Books.
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michel M. 1997(1995). The Political Economy of the World Trading System. From GATT to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1997(1995). The Political Economy of the World Trading System, From GATT to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenen, Peter B. 1994. Managing the World Economy: 50 Years after Bretton Woods. Washington D.C.: Institute of International Economics.
Lakoff George.2001. Metaphors of terror. The power of images. In These Times.com, 29th October, 1–9.
Lakoff, George L. and Johnson, Mark. 1994(1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lenk, Jürgen. 1995. Interpretation und Realität, Vorlesungen über Realismus der Philosophie der Interpretationskonstrukte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Ohiorhenuan, John. 2000. The south in an era of globalization. In: Ben Dennis and Kenneth Hell (eds). Globalization: A Calculus of Inequality. Perspectives from the South. Jamaica: Jan Randle Kingston, 53-92.
Opp de Hipt, Manfred and Latnial, Erich (eds). Sprache statt Politik?, Politikwissenschaftliche Semantik und Rhetorikforschung. Darmstadt/Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Petrilli, Susan. 1986. On the materiality of signs. Semiotica, Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies 62 ¾1, 223–245.
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing Reality, Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli: Sage.
Prakash, Aseem and Hart, Jeffrey A. (eds). 2000. Coping with Globalization, London/New York: Routledge.
Rigotti Francesca:Die Macht und Ihre Metaphern: Über die Sprachlichen Bilder der Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2000. Two principles for the next round or: How to bring developing countries in from the cold. The World Economy 23/41, 451.
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In: Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden (eds). Language and Peace. Aldershot/Brookfield/Singapore/Sydney: Dartmouth, 120–143.
Wesel Reinhard: Entwicklungspolitische Rhetorik: Kognitive Strukturen im Phänomenbereich “Dritte Welt” und ihre symbolische Politisierung zwischen euphorischer Projektion und Bedrohungsängsten. In: Manfred Opp de Hipt and Erich Latnial (eds). Sprache statt Politik?, Politikwissenschaftliche Semantik und Rhetorikforschung. Darmstadt/Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 65-80.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
de Rooij, Laurens
Natorski, Michal
Sun, Ya, Guangsa Jin, Yingli Yang & Jingjing Zhao
Sun, Ya & Jinlin Jiang
Hülsse, Rainer
[no author supplied]
2015. Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor: Norms and power in the European discourse on multilateralism. Journal of Language and Politics 14:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
