Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 3:2 (2004) ► pp.293–322

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Hegemonic struggles or transfer of knowledge?

East and West Germans in job interviews

Published online: 24 August 2004
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.2.08bir
Job interviews are an important means for the selection of employees in Western industrialised countries. Thus, they may be decisive with regard to the future of the person seeking work, making the difference between successful social participation or marginalisation. After the German reunification, East Germans had to prove themselves in a communicative genre marked by West German standards hitherto unknown to them.
The article analyses verbal sequences taken from job interviews between West German interviewers and East German job applicants in which genre specific knowledge is negotiated. It is shown that East German concepts of this genre are treated as knowledge deficits by the West German interviewers.
There is a positive outcome in this, since this allows for a transfer of socially relevant knowledge. And from an analytical point of view, these sequences provide us with data showing how institutional agents pass procedural knowledge on to their clients. Nevertheless, these sequences often take an asymmetrical course which is linked with a high risk for the individual’s positive self presentation in the job interview. The fact that West German agents set their genre knowledge as being universally valid is based on their hegemonic claim.
References (20)
References
Adelswärd, Viveka. 1988. Styles of Success. On Impression Management as Collaborative Action in Job Interviews. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping University. Schweden: VTT-Grafiska Vimmerby.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1995. Hegemonialer Geltungsanspruch und konversationelle Realität: Anmerkungen zu einer vernachlässigten Perspektive auf die Ost/West-Daten der Forschungsgruppe “Nationale Selbst- und Fremdbilder”. In: Marek Czyzewski et al.. (eds). Nationale Selbst- und Fremdbilder im Gespräch, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 379–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Learning How to Play the Game: An Investigation of Role-Played Interviews in East Germany. Text 18, 1, 7–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Changing communicative practices among East Germans. In: J. Theobald and Patrick Stevenson (eds). Relocating Germanness. Discursive Disunity in Unified Germany. London: Macmillan, 167–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter and Kern, Friederike. 2001. Three ways of analysing communication between East and West Germans as intercultural communication. In: Aldo Luziodi, Susanne Günthner and Franca Orletti (eds). Culture in Communication. Analyses of Intercultural Situations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg and Luckmann, Thomas. 1995. Reconstructive genres of everyday Communication. In: Uta Quasthoff (ed.). Aspects of Oral Communication. De Gruyter: Berlin/New York, 289–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birkner, Karin. 1998. “Normalerweise sagt man da…” Gattungsnormen im Bewerbungsgespräch. In: Birgit Apfelbaum and Hermann Müller (eds). Fremde im Gespräch. Frankfurt a.M.: IKO, 241–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Ost- und Westdeutsche im Bewerbungsgespräch. Eine kommunikative Gattung im Zeiten gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Ost- und Westdeutsche im Bewerbungsgespräch: Ein Fall von Interkultureller Kommunikation?. In: Helga Kotthoff (ed.). Kultur(en) im Gespräch. Tübingen: Narr, 301–331.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birkner, Karin and Kern, Friederike. 2000. Impression management in East and West German job interviews. In: Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.). Culturally Speaking: Managing Relations in Talk across Cultures. London: Cassell Academic, 255–271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Ordnung des Diskurses, Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1991. Gefängnishefte. (Hrsg.vom Deutschen Gramsci-Projekt unter der wissenschaftlichen Leitung von Klaus Bochmann). Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike. 2000. Kulturen der Selbstdarstellung. Ost- und Westdeutsche in Bewerbungsgesprächen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurtz, Donald V. 1996. Hegemony and anthropology. Gramsci, exegeses, reinterpretations. Critique of Anthropology 16(2), 103–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas. 1988. Kommunikative Gattungen im kommunikativen Haushalt einer Gesellschaft. In: Gisela Smolka-Koerdt¸ Peter Spangenberg and Dagmar Tillmann-Batylla (eds). Der Ursprung der Literatur. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 279–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Der kommunikative Aufbau der sozialen Welt und die Sozialwissenschaften. Annali di Sociologia 11 (I–II), 45–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Celia. 1985. The Interview Game and How it’s Played. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Eid, Gamal & Cornelius J. König
2023. Wie gehen Recruiter_innen mit der Herausforderung kulturübergreifender Bewerber_innenpools um?. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O 67:3 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Weston, Daniel
2021. Gatekeeping and linguistic capital: A case study of the Cambridge university undergraduate admissions interview. Journal of Pragmatics 176 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
König, Katharina & Qiang Zhu
2017. Communicative constructions of space in epistemic asymmetry: The case of German-Chinese university placement interviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:2 DOI logo
Hudson, Nancie
2016. Communication and power in the job interview: Using a ventriloqual approach to analyze moral accounts. Text & Talk 36:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Kuśmierczyk, Ewa
2014. Chapter 2. Trust in action. In Trust and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 56], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Manroop, Laxmikant, Janet A. Boekhorst & Jennifer A. Harrison
2013. The influence of cross-cultural differences on job interview selection decisions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24:18 ► pp. 3512 ff. DOI logo
Sanderson, Jimmy
2008. The Blog is Serving Its Purpose: Self-Presentation Strategies on 38pitches.com.. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13:4 ► pp. 912 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue