Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles
Recontextualizing the “community with a shared future for mankind”
A comparative discourse analysis of Singaporean and Pakistani news media
Published online: 5 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24227.tan
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24227.tan
Abstract
This study examines how the “Community with a Shared Future for Mankind” (CSFM) is recontextualized in Singaporean and Pakistani media, utilizing a Discourse-Historical Analysis framework and a Discourse-Conceptual Approach. It investigates the thematic features, argumentative topoi, and discursive strategies that shape the media’s representation of CSFM. The findings show that Singaporean media primarily frame CSFM within a discourse of pragmatic internationalism and regional stability, highlighting economic interdependence and geopolitical tensions. In contrast, Pakistani media emphasize CSFM as a transformative vision for mutual prosperity, focusing on solidarity, economic sovereignty, and development. The study demonstrates how the identified thematic categories correlate with specific semantic fields, creating key topoi that either legitimize or contest CSFM based on each country’s geopolitical positions and policy priorities. This research offers valuable insights into the discursive construction and recontextualization of political imaginaries within global public discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Transnational recontextualization of CSFM in media discourse
- 2.2Historical and geopolitical contexts of Singapore and Pakistan
- 3.Data, methods and analytical framework
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Methods
- 3.3Analytical framework
- 4.Thematic analysis and results
- 5.A discourse-conceptual analysis of CSFM
- 5.1Singaporean media topoi
- 5.1.1Regional stability & pragmatic engagement
- 5.1.2Economic interdependence & multilateralism
- 5.1.3Economic risk & dependency
- 5.1.4Geopolitical tension & great-power rivalry
- 5.1.5Political continuity & legitimacy
- 5.2Pakistani media topoi
- 5.2.1Existential threat & security cooperation
- 5.2.2Unbreakable solidarity & shared destiny
- 5.2.3Mutual prosperity & collective benefit
- 5.2.4Development, opportunity & economic sovereignty
- 5.2.5Global responsibility & South–South cooperation
- 5.1Singaporean media topoi
- 6.Analysis of discursive strategies and results
- 6.1Nomination
- 6.2Predication
- 6.3Perspectivization
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (27)
Ahmar, Moonis. 2017. “Dynamics of Pakistan-China Relations.” Journal of South Asian Studies VI (1): 86–102.
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226.
Bernstein, Basil. 1990. Class, Codes and Control. Vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
Cao, Xuanzi and Mingxing He. 2023. “Study on Spread and Acceptance of ‘Community with Shared Future for Mankind’ in Spanish-speaking Cultural Circle.” Modern Publishing (2): 101–114.
Ganguly, Sumit, Michal Smetana, Sannia Abdullah and Ales Karmazin. 2018. “India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir dispute: unpacking the dynamics of a South Asian frozen conflict.” Asia Europe Journal 17 (5): 129–143.
Gao, Jinping. 2023. “The Global Communication Vision of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind: An analysis the related report and article of media from 18 Countries.” Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication 45 (3): 6–25.
Grzywacz, Anna. 2019. “Singapore’s Foreign Policy toward Regional and Inter-regional Institutions.” Asian Perspective 43 (4): 647–671.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2016. “Recontextualisations of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society, 27 (3): 308–321.
. 2018. “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicisation and Mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1-2): 76–95.
. 2019. “Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: A discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media.” Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4): 465–490.
. 2020a. “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism.” Social Semiotics, 30 (4): 503–527.
. 2020b. “Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: Discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism.” Social Semiotics, 30 (4): 431–448.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Hugo Ekström. 2024. “‘No longer the haven of tolerance’? The press and discursive shifts on immigration in Sweden 2010–2022.” Social Semiotics 1–23.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Mats Ekström. 2022. “The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s.” Discourse & Society, 33 (6): 719–729.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Natalia Krzyżanowska. 2022. “Narrating the ‘new normal’ or pre-legitimising media control? COVID-19 and the discursive shifts in the far-right imaginary of ‘crisis’ as a normalisation strategy.” Discourse & Society, 33 (6): 805–818.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2011. “Political strategies and language policies: The European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy.” Language Policy 101: 115–136.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, Ruth Wodak, Hannah Bradby, Mattias Gardell, Aristotle Kallis, Natalia Krzyżanowska, Cas Mudde, and Jens Rydgren. 2023. “Discourses and practices of the ‘New Normal’. Towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on crisis and the normalization of anti- and post‑democratic action.” Journal of Language and Politics, 22 (4): 415–437.
Nathan, Andrew J., and Boshu Zhang. 2021. “‘A Shared Future for Mankind’: Rhetoric and Reality in Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping.” Journal of Contemporary China 31 (133): 57–71.
Rajaratnam, Sinnathamby. February 6, 1972. “Singapore: Global City.” [URL]
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The discourse-historical approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Wodak Ruth, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage (2nd revised edition).
Rudolf, Moritz. September 28, 2023. “Ambiguity: The Key Obstacle for China’s Ambition to Reshape the Global Order.” [URL]
Sarwar, Hira. March 30, 2023. “China’s Vision for a Shared Future: Call for Global Cooperation.” [URL]
Tobin, Liza. 2018. “Xi’s Vision for Transforming Global Governance: A Strategic Challenge for Washington and Its Allies.” Texas National Security Review 2 (1): 154–166.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1985. “Structures of news in the press.” In Discourse and communication, ed. by T. A. van Dijk, 69–93. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Xi, Jinping. March 23, 2013. “shun ying shi dai qian jin chao liu, cu jin shi jie he ping fa zhan.” [URL]