Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse Theory and the Turn to Practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts, Maximilian Grönegräs and Yannis Stavrakakis
[Journal of Language and Politics 24:1] 2025
► pp. 25–49

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Discourse Theory and Strategic Communication

A long-expected party

ORCiD logo with link | UCLouvain Saint-Louis Bruxelles
Published online: 7 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24199.jac
Abstract
This contribution explores the nexus between Discourse Theory and Strategic Communication. Traditional positivist and rationalist approaches to business, economics, politics, and management often marginalize strategic communication as merely instrumental; whereas discursive approaches, and Discourse Theory in particular, recognize its constitutive role in shaping social realities. This contribution therefore argues for the development of a discourse-theoretical approach to Strategic Communication, highlighting its potential to offer new insights and understandings. It first examines existing uses of the notion of discourse in Strategic Communication, before discussing Discourse Theory’s potential added value to its study. Next, it emphasizes the importance of Discourse Theory scholars engaging with Strategic Communication topics. Finally, two examples contrasting non-discursive and discourse-theoretical approaches are presented, focusing respectively on populism and authenticity in corporate marketing campaigns. Overall, this paper advocates for a deeper integration of Discourse Theory within the study of Strategic Communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
  • 3.Why a discourse-theoretical approach to Strategic Communication?
    • 3.1Defining Strategic Communication comprehensively
    • 3.2A monistic ontology that ‘goes all the way down’
    • 3.3Methodological compatibility
  • 4.Why Strategic Communication as a research object in Discourse Theory?
    • 4.1Tackling the ‘harder’ topics
    • 4.2Expediting hands-on empirical research
    • 4.3Power and critique
  • 5.Studying Strategic Communication in a discourse-theoretical manner: Populism and marketing
    • 5.1Populism and political strategy
    • 5.2Authenticity, marketing, and corporate strategy
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (58)
References
Aggerholm, Helle Kryger, and Birte Asmuß. 2016. “A Practice Perspective on Strategic Communication: The Discursive Legitimization of Managerial Decisions.” Journal of Communication Management 20 (3): 195–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, David. 2019. Beyoncé: Say My (Brand) Name. SAGE Business Cases Originals. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 20126. Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balogun, Julia, Claus Jacobs, Paula Jarzabkowski, Saku Mantere, and Eero Vaara. 2014. “Placing Strategy Discourse in Context: Sociomateriality, Sensemaking, and Power.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (2): 175–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beetz, Johannes. 2016. Materiality and subject in Marxism, (Post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouzon, Arlette. 2013. “Theoretical approaches in organizational and strategic communication: a review of the french academic literature.” Organisational and Strategic Communication Research: European Perspectives by Gisela Gonçalves, Ian Somerville and Ana Melo, pp. 23–46. Lisbon: Labcom Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, Bradley, Dawn Chanland, and Steven Cox. 2024. Dove’s advertising campaign highs and lows: From real beauty to real success to real controversy. Business Case Journal 27 (1): 16–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buhmann, Alexander, and Fraser Likely. 2018. “Evaluation and measurement in strategic communication.” In: The international encyclopedia of strategic communication by Heath, Robert Lawrence, and Winni Johansen, pp. 625–640. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheney, George, and Lars Thøger Christensen. 2001. “Public Relations as Contested Terrain: A Critical Response.” In Handbook of Public Relations by Robert Heath & Gabriel Vasquez, pp. 167–182. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. 2012. “Is there a normative deficit in the theory of hegemony?” In Laclau: A Critical Reader by Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, pp. 113–122. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost-The Public 24 (4): 301–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis, and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža. 2021. “An introduction to the special issue on ‘Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice’.” Journal of Language and Politics 20, (1): 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts, and Yannis Stravrakakis. 2024. “Discourse theory and the turn to practice: Lessons from the populist moment.” Journal of Language and Politics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fougère, Martin, and Charles Barthold. 2020. “Onwards to the New Political Frontier: Macron’s Electoral Populism.” Organization 27 (3): 419–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez. 2021. “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods: Advances, Challenges and Ways Forward.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1): 62–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Matthew H., and Abel Gustafson. 2023. “A framework for understanding the effects of strategic communication campaigns.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 17 (1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golsorkhi, Damon, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara. 2010. “What is strategy-as-practice.” In: Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice by Golsorkhi, Damon, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara, pp. 1-20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke Van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh. 2007. “Defining Strategic Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 1 (1): 3–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Defining strategic communication.” International journal of strategic communication 1 (1): 3–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas. 2014. “Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (2): 320–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herschinger, Eva. 2012. “‘Hell is the Other’: Conceptualising Hegemony and Identity through Discourse Theory.” Millennium 41 (1): 65–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Jochen, Karina Nyborg, Charlotte Averhoff, and Simone Olesen. 2020. “The contingency of corporate political advocacy: Nike’s ‘dream crazy’campaign with Colin Kaepernick.” Public Relations Inquiry 9 (2): 155–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtzhausen, Derina, and Ansgar Zerfass. 2014. “Strategic Communication: Opportunities and Challenges of the Research Area.” In: The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication by Derina Holtzhausen and Ansgar Zerfass, pp. 3–17. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas. 2019. “Discourse Theory as an Independent Paradigm for Studying Institutions: Towards a New Definition of ‘Discursive Construction’ in Institutional Analysis.” Contemporary Political Theory, 181: 379–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaynes, Steve. “Making Strategic Change: a Critical Discourse Analysis.” 2015. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28 (1): 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Joon Kyoung, Holly Overton, Nandini Bhalla, and Jo-Yun Li. 2020. “Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses.” Public Relations Review 46 (2): 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotler, Philip. 2020. “Marketing and Value Creation.” Journal of Creating Value 6 (1): 10–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985/2014. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macnamara, Jim. 2018. “A Review of New Evaluation Models for Strategic Communication: Progress and Gaps.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 12 (2): 180–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2023. Strategic communication: Campaign planning. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marttila, Tomas. 2015. Post-foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Jamie. 2019. “Populism, Inequality and Representation: Negotiating ‘the 99%’ with Occupy London.” The Sociological Review 67 (5): 1018–1033. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molleda, Juan-Carlos. 2010. “Authenticity and the construct’s dimensions in public relations and communication research.” Journal of communication management 14 (3): 223–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin. 2017. “Discourse analysis as critique.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Hegemony Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Research Practice.” In: Discourse, Culture and Organization, by Tomas Marttila, pp. 63–104. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nothhaft, Howard, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass. 2020. “Strategic communication: Reflections on an elusive concept.” In: Future directions of Strategic Communication by Howard Nothhaft, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass, pp. 24–38. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez, Andrea. 2019. “Building a theoretical framework of message authenticity in CSR communication.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 24 (2): 334–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, Linda L., and Anne Maydan Nicotera. 2010. “Communicative Constitution of Organization is a Question: Critical Issues for Addressing it.” Management Communication Quarterly 24 (1): 158–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raaz, Oliver. 2021. “The Antagonist of the Antagonist: Towards the Deconstruction of the Communication-scientific distinction between Advertising and Public Relations.” Publizistik 661: 215–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saren, Michael. Ed. 2007. Critical marketing: Defining the field. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez, Gustavo, Francisco Valenzuela, and Matías Sanfuentes. 2024. “In pursuit of (post-)bureaucratic promises: Analyzing the logics of career self-management discourse at a privatized company.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 40 (1): 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Steffen Blaschke, François Cooren, Robert D. McPhee, David Seidl, and James R. Taylor. 2014. “The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison.” Management Communication Quarterly 28 (2): 285–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiffert-Brockmann, Jens, Bradley Wiggins, and Howard Nothhaft. 2023. “The meme’s-eye view of strategic communication: A case study of social movements from a memetic perspective.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 17 (3): 245–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skålén, Per, Martin Fougère, and Markus Fellesson. 2007. Marketing Discourse: A Critical Perspective. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2017. Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 523–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, James R., and Elizabeth J. Van Every. 2010. The Situated Organization: Case Studies in the Pragmatics of Communication Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Drum. 2017. “‘I originally had Nike in mind’: Meet the student behind that powerful Adidas ad that’s courting attention from WPP and Droga5.” Available online at 〈[URL]〉, last verified on 8/10/2024.
Thomas, Gail Fann, and Kimberlie J. Stephens. 2015. “An introduction to strategic communication.” International Journal of Business Communication 52 (1): 3–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torp, Simon Møberg. 2014. “The Strategic Turn in Communication Science: On the History and Role of Strategy in Communication Science from Ancient Greece until the Present Day.” In: The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication by Derina Holtzhausen and Ansgar Zerfass, pp. 34–52. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tunderman, Simon. 2023. Hegemony and the Politics of Labour: Towards a Discourse Theory of Value in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vesa, Mikko, and Eero Vaara. 2014. “Strategic Ethnography 2.0: Four Methods for Advancing Strategy Process and Practice Research.” Strategic Organization 12 (4): 288–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werder, Kelly Page, Howard Nothhaft, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass. 2020. “Strategic Communication as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Paradigm.” In: Future directions of Strategic Communication by Howard Nothhaft, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass, pp. 5–23. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Comparative politics 34 (1): 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “A Political-strategic approach.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Populism by Cristóbal Kaltwasser, Paul A. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, pp. 48–72. Oxford: Oxford University pressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whittington, Richard. 1996. “Strategy as Practice.” Long Range Planning 29 (5): 731–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Peter, and Michael Etter. 2018. “Strategic Communication and Emergence: A Dual Narrative Framework.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 12 (4): 382–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Brown, Katy
2025. Introduction: A Novel Framework. In Discourse Theory, Critical Discourse Studies and Corpus Linguistics [Advancing Methods for Interdisciplinarity in the Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts & Yannis Stavrakakis
2025. Discourse theory and the turn to practice. Journal of Language and Politics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue