Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles
The American abortion debate
The war of morality Republicans and Democrats talked into being
Published online: 5 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23189.fra
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23189.fra
Abstract
This paper examines metaphor in the American abortion debate. It takes a systematic and fine-grained approach to
analysing war conceptualisations in abortion-related speeches and statements from the Republican and Democrat parties between 2009
and 2023. Analysis focuses on the conceptual framing abortion debate is war, and how various linguistic features
constitute this world. This approach demonstrates how conceptual metaphors can be used to shape social attitude and justify
political action — in the case of abortion, demonstrating how war conceptualisation has enacted a culture conducive to
polarisation and partisanship.
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, war metaphor, abortion, political discourse, polarisation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Metaphor theory and the abortion debate is war concept
- 1.2The conceptual foundations of American conservatism and liberalism
- 1.3Abortion policy in the United States
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Analysis
- 3.12009–2017: The abortion debate is war concept in Democrat and Republican data
- 3.1.1The Democrat world of war
- 3.1.2The Republican world of war
- 3.22017–2021: The abortion debate is war concept in Democrat and Republican data
- 3.2.1The Democrat world of war
- 3.2.2The Republican world of war
- 3.32021–2023: The abortion debate is war concept in Democrat and Republican data
- 3.3.1The Democrat world of war
- 3.3.2The Republican world of war
- 3.12009–2017: The abortion debate is war concept in Democrat and Republican data
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (24)
Coe, Kevin, and Reitzes, Michael. 2010. “Obama on the Stump: Features and Determinants of a Rhetorical Approach”. Presidential Studies Quarterly 40 (3):391–413. [URL].
Epstein, Kayla, and Honderich, Holly. 2023. “Mike Pence Challenges Rivals to Back 15-week Abortion Ban. BBC, June 24”. [URL]
Heltzel, Gordon, and Lauren, Kristin. 2020. “Polarization in America: Two Possible Futures”. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 341: 179–184. [URL].
Howe, Nicholas. 2009. “Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 3 (2):87–104.
Husting, Ginna. 2006. “Neutralizing Protest: The Construction of War, Chaos, and National Identity through US Television News on Abortion-Related Protest, 1991”. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 3 (2):162–180.
Jamet, Denis, and Terry, Adeline. 2020. “What Makes Metaphors Manipulative Tools?” Studies in Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 51. [URL].
KFF. 2024, March 7. “1 in 8 Voters Say Abortion Is Most Important to Their Vote: They Lean Democratic, Support Biden, and Want Abortion to Be Legal”. [URL]
Koralewska, Inga, and Zielińska, Katarzyna. 2021. “‘Defending the Unborn’, ‘Protecting Women’ and ‘Preserving Culture and Nation’: Anti-Abortion Discourse in the Polish Right-Wing Press.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 24 (5): 673–687.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. “The Conceptual System”. In Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor, edited by Zoltán Kövecses. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George. 1995. “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust”. Social Research 62 (2):177–214.
Lakoff, George, and Wehling, Elisabeth. 2016. Your Brain’s Politics: How the Science of Mind Explains the Political Divide. Andrews UK.
Lakoff, George, Espenson, Jane, and Schwartz, Alan. 1991. Master Metaphor List (2nd edition). Cognitive Linguistics Group. University of California at Berkeley.
Murphy, John. 2015. “Barack Obama and Rhetorical History”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 101 (1):213–224.
Pew Research Center. 2024, May 13. ‘Public opinion on abortion”. [URL]
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1):1–39.
Roberti, Amanda. 2021. “Women Deserve Better”: The Use of the Pro-Woman Frame in Anti-Abortion Policies in U.S. States”. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42 (3):207–224.
. 2022. “Empowering Women by Regulating Abortion? Conservative Women Lawmaker’s Cooptation of Feminist Language in US Abortion Politics”. Politics, Groups, and Identities 10 (1):139–145.
Statham, Simon, and Ringrow, Helen. 2022. “Wrap Our Arms Around Them Here in Ireland”: Social Media Campaigns in the Irish Abortion Referendum. Discourse & Society 33 (4):539–557.
Tannen, Deborah. 1999. The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War on Words. Random House Publishing Group.
. 2013. “The Argument Culture: Agonism and the Common Good”. Daedalus 142 (2):177–184. [URL]