Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 24:3 (2025) ► pp.390–414
The power of language
Socio-political fracture in Tunisia’s post-Arab Spring revolution
Published online: 15 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23092.gab
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23092.gab
Abstract
One of the most overlooked areas of study in the post-Arab Spring narrative is the symbiotic relationship between
language and politics. Framed by the micro and macro-level approaches to discourse, the paper’s scope is twofold. First, it
identifies and discusses how language elements underpin the performative role of language (Austin, John L. 1975 [1962]. How to Do Things With
Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ) and considers Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy
of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. work on speech-acts and
rhetoric through irony and metaphor. Second, it discusses how the study of language, through power and ideology, provides a candid
and deeper understanding of Tunisian politics; an ‘internal’ perspective on how participants in these discourses perceive the
Tunisian people, society, culture, and politics, reflecting on a decade since the revolution. The paper hinges on various textual
genres, such as televised interviews, debates, and rap songs, sampling some emerging new sociopolitical spaces wherein, through
discursive themes, participants address Tunisia’s political and economic grievances since the revolution.
Keywords: Arab Spring, Foucault, discourse analysis, Irony, revolution, Tunisia
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Role of language in political discourse and Arab Spring
- 1.2Language and music
- 2.Theoretical approaches to language and politics
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Method of analysis: The discourse historical method (DHA)
- 3.2.1Discursive strategies
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary speech acts
- 4.2Irony and metaphor
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (45)
Al-Jazeera Arabic. 2020. “Baʿda ʿachra sanawāt min al-thawara: Tunis ʾila ayn? [Ten
years from the Revolution. Where Tunisia is Heading?].” Al-Jazeera
Arabic, December 22, 2020. [URL]
Bach Baoueb, Sallouha Lamia. 2020. “Tunisian Hip-hop Music
Discourse: Linguistic, Socio-cultural, and Political Movements from the Local to the Global or Vice Versa? A Case Study of
Balti’s Songs.” Language &
Communication 751 (November): 1–20.
Barone, Stefano. 2017. “Feeling
so Hood. Rap, Lifestyles and the Neighbourhood Imaginary in Tunisia.” British Journal of Middle
Eastern
Studies 46 (1):1–16.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cutting, Joan. 2011. “Spoken
Discourse.” In Continuum Companion to Discourse
Analysis, edited by Ken Paltridge and Brian Hyland. 155–170. London: Continuum.
Foucault, Michel. 1981a. “The
Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist
Reader, edited by Robert Young. 48–78. Boston: Routledge.
Fulco, Carmen and Mattia Giampaolo. 2023. “The
Neoliberal Cage: Alternative Analysis of the Rise of Populist Tunisia.” Middle East
Critique 32(1): 27–52.
Gabsi, Zouhir. 2019. Tunisia’s
Youth: Awakened Identity and Challenges Post-Arab Spring.” British Journal of Midde Eastern
Studies 46(1): 68–87.
. 2020a. The
Language of Hip Hop and Rap in Tunisia: Sociocultural Mirror, Authenticity Tool, and Herald of
Change.” The Journal of North African
Studies 25(4): 545–571.
. 2020b. “Rap
and Mizoued Music: Claiming a Space for Dissent and Protest in Post-Arab Spring
Tunisia.” Sociological Research
Online 25(4), 626–643.
Golpushnezad, Elham and Stephano Barone. 2016. “On
n’est pas à Vendre. L’économie Politique du Rap dans la Tunisie
Post-révolution.” Politique
Africaine 141 (1): 27–51. [URL].
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language,
Context and Text: Aspects of Language in Social-Semiotic
Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helal, Fethi. 2019. “The
Discursive Construction of Ideologies and National Identity in Post-Revolutionary Tunisia (2011–2017): The Case of the
Francophiles.” Critical Discourse
Studies 16(2): 179–200.
Jerad, Nabiha. 2013. “The
Tunisian Revolution: From Universal Slogans for Democracy to the Power of Language.” Middle
East Journal of Culture and
Communication 61: 232–255.
Kausch, Kristina. 2013. “Foreign
Funding’ in Post-Revolution Tunisia.” Accessed February 15, 2021. [URL]
LyonOran. 2011. “khiṭāb Zine El Abidine Ben Ali 13 Jānfī 2011” [Ben Ali’s Speech 13 January
2011]. YouTube
video, 8:28, January 14, 2011. [URL]
Nordquist, Richard. “Definition
and Examples of the Topoi in Rhetoric.” ThoughtCo, August 26, 2020. [URL]
Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse
and Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
. 2016. “The
Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical
Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 23–61. 3rd.
ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
Richardson, John E. 2017. British Fascism: A Discourse-Historical
Analysis. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag/ibidem Press.
Rubinelli, Sara. 2018. “Rhetoric
as a Civic Art From Antiquity to the Beginning of Modernity.” In The
Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner. 17–29. Taylor & Francis Group.
Saadellaoui, Wahiba. 2014. “Les nouvelles formes de contestation: Le cas du rap Tunisie” [New Forms of Protest: The Case of Tunisian Rap]. [URL]
Salzbrunn, Monika, Farida Souiah and Simon Mastrangelo. 2015. “Les ‘brûleurs’ de frontières dans la musique populaire tunisienne. La migration non documentée au prisme de
chansons de rap et de mezoued” [the Border Jumpers in Tunisien Popular
Music. Undocumented Migration through the Prism of Rap and Mezoued Songs]. Afrique
Contemporaine 2(254): 37–56.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy
of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snowdon, Peter. 2014. “The
Revolution Will Be Uploaded: Vernacular Video and the Arab Spring.” Culture
Unbound 6(2): 401–429.
Storey, John. 2009. Cultural
Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. 5th
ed. London: Pearson Longman.
2016. “Critical Discourse Studies: A
Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies
Amsterdam, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 63–85. Los Angeles: SAGE.
2018. “Socio-Cognitive Discourse
Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse
Studies, edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson. 26–44. New York: Routledge.
. 2017. The
“Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”: Who’s Who? Journal of Language and
Politics 16(4), 551–565.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Robles, Jessica S. & Bingjuan Xiong
2024. How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse. Journal of Language and Politics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
