Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:6 (2023) ► pp.826–845

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“There is new technology here that can perform miracles”

The discursive psychology of technological optimism in climate change policy debates

ORCiD logo with link | University of Copenhagen
Published online: 29 September 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23035.nie
Abstract
This paper puts the spotlight on the discursive practices by which politicians, interest group representatives, and other influential public figures in effect promote climate inaction by conveying confidence in technological innovation. Data consist of policy debates on prominent public service television in Denmark. The study uses Discursive Psychology to examine how references to technological innovation are: (i) sequentially invoked as the solution to problematization of policies that allow high levels of emissions; (ii) grammatically designed to highlight the force of technological innovation; and (iii) rhetorically produced to support a subjective contrast between a pessimist and an optimist outlook. Overall, the study finds that invocation of technological optimism constitutes a ‘ready answer’ to communicative challenges that emerge during the debates, which effectively justifies inaction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Data and methodological approach
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Technological innovation as the answer to high emission levels
    • 4.2Technological innovation as agency
    • 4.3Technological innovation as grounds for optimism
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • References
References (43)
References
Anable, Jilian, and Christian Brand. 2022. “Is the Future Electric?” In The Climate Book, ed. by Gretha Thunberg, 271–275. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck Nielsen, Søren. 2023. “Orchestration of Perspectives in Televised Climate Change Debates.” Discourse & Society 34 (2): 175–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey, Melissa Marselle, Laura McGuire, and Damian Litchfield. 2017. ”Staying Over-Optimistic about the Future: Uncovering Attentional Biases to Climate Change Messages.” Semiotica 2181: 21–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1985. “Prejudice, Categorization and Particularization – from a Perceptual to a Rhetorical Approach.” European Journal of Social Psychology 15 (1): 79–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Shanie, and Mirko A. Demasi. 2019. “Applying Discursive Psychology to ‘Fact’ Construction in Political Discourse.” Social And Personality Psychology Compass 13 (5): Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2002. “Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1385–1401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demasi, Mirko A. 2019. “Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology 40 (1): Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. “Post-truth Politics and Discursive Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14 (9): Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dessler, Andrew. 2022. Introduction to Modern Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 2007. “Managing Subjectivity in Talk.” In Discursive Research in Practice. New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction, ed. by Alexa Hepburn, and Sally Wiggins, 31–49. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. and S. Thompson. 2010. “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2): 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gifford, Robert. 2011. “The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers that Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.” American Psychologist 66 (4): 290–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gifford, Robert, Karine Lacroix, and Angel Chen. 2018. “Understanding Responses to Climate Change: Psychological Barriers to Mitigation and a New Theory of Behavioral Choice.” In Psychology and Climate Change: Human Perceptions, Impacts, and Responses, ed. by Susan Clayton, and Christie Manning, 161–184. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1992. “On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees”. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 268–301. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanson-Easey, Scott, Susan Williams, Alana Hansen, Kathryn Fogarty, and Peng Bi. 2015. “Speaking of Climate Change: A Discursive Analysis of Lay Understandings.” Science Communication 37 (2): 217–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Glasgow: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iversen, Clara. 2015. “Hitting the Ontological Rock Bottom. Discursive Psychology’s Respecification of the Realism/Relativism Debate.” In Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues, ed. by Cristian Tileagă, and Elisabeth Stokoe, 29–42. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. Volume One. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1987. “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurz, Tim, Martha Augoustinos, and Shona Crabb. 2010. “Contesting the ‘National interest’ and Maintaining ‘our Lifestyle’: A Discursive Analysis of Political Rhetoric around Climate Change.” British Journal of Social Psychology 491: 601–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurz, Tim, and Annayah M. B. Prosser. 2021. “Understanding the Social Dynamics of Climate Change through Analyses of Discourse.” Current Opinion of Psychology 421: 71–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacroix, Karine, Robert Gifford, and Angel Chen. 2019. “Developing and Validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPB) Scale.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 631: 9–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamb William, F., Giulio Mattoli, Sebastian Levi, J. Timmons Roberts, Stuart Capstick, Felix Creutzig, Jan C. Minx, Finn Müller-Hansen, Trevor Culhane, and Julia K. Steinberger. 2020. “Discourses of climate delay.” Global Sustainability 3, e17, 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, Abigail, and Derek Edwards. 2003. “Bill and Monica: Memory, Emotion and Normativity in Clinton’s Grand Jury Testimony.” British Journal of Social Psychology 42 (2): 239–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kristian Steensen, Susan Clayton, Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz, Stuart Capstick, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2020. “How Psychology Can Help Limit Climate Change.” American Psychologist 76 (1): 130–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel. 2018. ““It’s ok if it’s hidden”: The discursive construction of everyday racism for refugees and asylum seekers in Wales.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 28 (3): 111–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, Paul, James Higham, Diana Kutzner, and Scott Cohen. 2016. “Are Technology Myths Stalling Aviation Climate Policy?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 441: 30–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1988. ”Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 2005. ”Making Psychology Relevant.” Discourse & Society 16 (5): 739–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, Alexa Hepburn, and Derek Edwards. 2020. “Rethinking Attitudes and Social Psychology – Issues of Function, Order, and Combination in Subject-Side and Object-Side Assessments in Natural Settings.” Qualitative Research In Psychology 17 (3): 336–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rejeski, David. 2019. “There’s an App for That. Can Technology Save the Planet?” In A Better Planet: Forty Big Ideas for a Sustainable Future, ed. by Daniel C. Esty, 112–121. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 323–345. New York: Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1992. “On Talk and its Institutional Occasions.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 101–134. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael T., Scott D. Neufeld, Caroline M. L. Mackay, and Odilia Dys-Steenbergen. 2020. “The Perils of Explaining Climate Inaction in Terms of Psychological Barriers.” Journal of Social Issues 76 (1): 123–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tileagă, Cristian. 2019. “Communicating Misogyny: An Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Social Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13 (7): e12491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tileagă, Cristian, Mirko A. Demasi, and Shani Burke. 2020. “The Discursive Psychology of Political Communication.” In Political Communication. Discursive Perspectives, ed. by Mirko A. Demasi, Shani Burke, and Cristian Tileagă, 1–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toivonen, Heidi. 2022. “Themes of Climate Change Agency: A qualitative Study of How People Construct Agency in Relation to Climate Change.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 91: 102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2012. “Construal and Perspectivization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 48–81. Oxford: Oxford Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter. 2017. “Discursive Psychology.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, ed. by Carla Willig, and Wendy Stainton Rogers, 93–109. SAGE Publications Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Beck Nielsen, Søren
2025. Contradicting potential climate misinformation during televised debates. Pragmatics and Society 16:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2025. Using formulations to maximize differences of opinion during televised climate change panel interviews. Journalism 26:3 ► pp. 676 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Wenyi, Hengtian Zhang & Zhouyang Deng
2025. Public attitude and media governance of biometric information dissemination in the era of digital intelligence. Scientific Reports 15:1 DOI logo
Brooks, James & Leah Wingard
2024. Evolutions in hegemonic discourses of climate change: An ecomodern enactment of implicatory denial. Discourse & Society 35:3 ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo
Sambaraju, Rahul & Chris McVittie
2024. ‘Well, our goal is to achieve sustainable quiet and security for our people’: Negotiating calls for ceasefires in the Gaza war of 2014 in mainstream English news media by Israeli spokespersons. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 12:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue