Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.261–282

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The aesthetic values of the semiotic choices in Arab protests

Social categorization, identity construction, intertextuality and interdiscursivity

ORCiD logo with link | Mustansiriyah University
Published online: 28 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22149.moh
Abstract
This paper examines protest language from the late Arab Spring uprisings, more specifically in Tunisia, Egypt and Iraq – identified as the “Facebook Upheavals”. It explores the discursive aspects of these processes through which social protest and dissent are constructed and different forms of communication and expression are mobilized. It also examines how the various modes of representation and dissemination contribute to shaping and influencing social movements and resistance within the Arab political context, individually and collectively. On the collective level, the paper explores the discursive construction of collective identities, the formation of alliances, and the negotiation of power relations within and between different protest movements. This is done by reporting how discourses are used to challenge dominant narratives, contest oppressive structures, and then to shape the political landscape in the Arab region.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Protests in the Arab world from 2011 to 2019
  • 3.Literature review
  • 4.Scope and significance
  • 5.Data collection and analysis
  • 6.Analysis: Macro discourse topics (frames) as an analytical instrument
  • 7.Macro discourse topics: Identity construction in Arabs’ protests
    • 7.1National ambition and patriotic frame
    • 7.2Political reform: Civic engagement and organizing
    • 7.3Arab peoples’ activism and authority
    • 7.4Social categorization: The on-going resistance for the continuing threats
  • 8.Intertextuality in Arabic protests
  • 9.Interdiscursivity
  • 10.Conclusions
  • References
References (55)
References
Al-Rikaby, A. B., Mahadi, T. S. T., & Tan, D. A. L. 2018. “Analyzing the Political Uses of Figures of Speech in Non-State Leaders’ Rhetorical Titles: Case Studies of Al-Qa’ida and ISIS.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 26 (T): 299 – 311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist, 60–102. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. 2012. “Politicizing Identity: Code choice and stance taking during the Egyptian revolution.” Discourse & Society, 23(2): 107–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, D. 2007. Semiotics: The Basics. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherribi, S. 2017. Fridays of Rage: Al Jazeera, the Arab Spring, and Political Islam. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, R. 2010. “Framing the Pictures in Our Heads: Exploring the Framing and Agenda-Setting Effects of Visual Images.” In Doing News Framing Analysis Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Paul D’Angelo and Jim, A. K., 233–261. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2010. “Welsh linguistic landscapes from above and from below.” In Semiotic landscapes: Language, Image, Space, edited by A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow, 77–101. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, N. and Garrett, P. 2010. “Linguistic landscapes, discursive frames and metacultural performance.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2051: 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolores Porto, M. 2022. “Water Metaphors and Evaluation of Syrian Migration: The Flow of Refugees in the Spanish Press.” Metaphor and Symbol 37, 3: 252–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagin, A. 2000. “Environmental Protest in the Czech Republic: Three Stages of Post-communist Development.” Czech Sociological Review 8(2):139–56. [URL].
Fairclough, N. L. 1992a. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society, 3(2):193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992b. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Analysing Discourse – textual research for social research. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. 1996. Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frekko, S. E. 2009. “Signs of respect: Neighborhood, public, and language in Barcelona.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(2): 227–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, I. 2003. “Discourse as History: History as Discourse. ‘The Rise of Modern China’ – a History Exhibition in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” In Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, edited by R. Martin & R. Wodak, 195–216. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, P. R., & Krzyzanowski, Majid. 2008. “Identity, Belonging and Migration: Beyond Describing ‘Others’.” In Identity, Belonging, Migration, edited by G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. R. Jones, 38–53. Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2015. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourse. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, & Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2006. Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasanga, Luanga A. 2012. “Mapping the linguistic landscape of a commercial neighborhood in central Phnom Penh.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 321: 553–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “The linguistic landscape: mobile signs, code choice, symbolic meaning and territoriality in the discourse of protest.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2301: 19–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 11: 2889–2897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2018. “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4): 427–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Majid. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumar, A. 2001. Rewriting the Language of Politics. New Delhi: Monohar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, Winston, Clarke, Ian. and Wodak, Ruth. 2009. “Organizational Decision-making, Discourse, and Power: Integrating across contexts and scales.” Discourse & Communication, 3(3): 273–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, A. 2002. “Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 221 (March): 96–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linke, U. 2008. “The language of resistance: Rhetorical tactics and symbols of protest in Germany.” City and Society, 2(2): 127–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. 2012. How to do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, J. 2019. Intertextuality in practice (Vol. 331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Wodak, R., eds. 2003. Re/reading the past. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morva, Oya. (2016). “The humorous language of street dissent.” The European Journal of Humour Research, 4(2), 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Zhongdang and Kosicki, Gerald M. 1993. “Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.” Political Communication, 10(1):55–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papen, U. 2012. “Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens’ protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1): 56–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philipps, Axel. 2012. “Visual protest materials as empirical data.” Visual Communication, 11(1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickard, S. 2019. Politics, protest and young people: Political participation and dissent in 21st century Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riggins, S. H. 1990. Beyond Goffman: Studies on Communication, Institution, and Social Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Said, S. B., & Kasanga, L. A. 2016. “The discourse of protest: Frames of identity, intertextuality and interdiscursivity.” In Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic landscapes, edited by Robert, B., Elizabeth, L. & Hirut, W., 71–83. India: Bloomsbury AcademicGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salahshour, N. 2017. Representation of Immigrants in New Zealand Print Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scalmer, S. 2002. Dissent events: Protest, the media, and the political gimmick in Australia. UNSW Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 1997. Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(1): 39–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001a. Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. “Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action.” In Methods in critical discourse analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and M. Meyer, 141–184. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. and Scollon, S. 2003. Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emergent Internet. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ukeje, Charles. 2004. “From Aba to Ugborodo: Gender identity and alternative discourse of social protest among women in the oil delta of Nigeria.” Oxford Development Studies, 32(4): 605–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. 2002. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah, T., Deborah, S. and Heidi, H., 352–371. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Andrew. G. 2001. “Urban protest and the discourse of popular nationalism in post- revolutionary Mexico: The case of the Veracruz rent strike.” National Identities, 2(3): pp. 265–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue