References (75)
References
Achugar, Mariana. 2021. “Understanding racist discourse practices from the Global South: (re)scaling power and meaning making”. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 76–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmed, Yunana. 2021. “Political discourse analysis: a decolonial approach”. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 139–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahrens, Kathleen. ed. 2009. Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors. Palgrave- MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahrens, Kathleen and Lee, Sophia. 2009. “Gender versus politics: When conceptual models collide in the US senate”. In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, pp. 62–82. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alam, Zainab. 2021. “Violence against women in politics: The case of Pakistani women’s activism”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 21–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Jemimah, Diabah, Grace and hMensa, Patience. 2011. “Powerful women in powerless language: Media misrepresentation of African women in politics (the case of Liberia)”. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2509–2518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archakis, Argiris. 2014. “Immigrant voices in students’ essay texts: Between assimilation and pride”. Discourse & Society 25(3): 297–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. “Discourse in the novel”. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, edited by Michael Holquist, pp. 269–422. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardall, Gabrielle. 2018. Violence, politics and gender. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi. 2020. “Exploring the Englishes of world politics”. World Englishes 39(4): 544–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana. 2018. Political discourse as dialogue: A Latin American perspective. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonnin, Juan. 2019. “(Des)afiliación y (des)alineamiento: Procedimientos interaccionales para la producción de voz”. Pragmática Sociocultural 7(2): 231–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Discourse analysis for social change: Voice, agency and hope”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 267/2681: 69–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1971. “Une interprétation de la théorie de la religion selon Max Weber”. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 12(1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broughton, Sharon and Palmieri, Sonia. 1999. “Gendered contributions to parliamentary debates: The case of euthanasia”. Australian Political Studies Association 34(1): 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates”. In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, pp. 139–165. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbetta, Christianne, Voelkel, Jan, Cooper, Marianne, and Willer, Robb. 2021. “Pragmatic bias impedes women’s access to political leadership”. PNAS 119(6): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Melo Resende, Viviane. 2021a. Decolonizing critical discourse studies – An introduction. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 3–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. “Decolonizing critical discourse studies: For a Latin American perspective”. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 10–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diabah, Grace. 2022. “Bloody widows? Discourses of tradition and gender in Ghanaian politics”. Discourse & Society 33(2): 154–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diabah, Grace and Agyepong, Dorothy. 2022. “‘The mother of all nations’: Gendered discourses in Ghana’s 2020 elections”’. Social Dynamics 48(3): 509–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penny and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1999. “New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research”. Language in Society 281: 185–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 2007. “Worlds and knowledges otherwise”. Cultural Studies 21(2): 179–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora. 2017. “The mother’s picong: A discursive approach to gender, identity and political leadership in Trinidad and Tobago”. Discourse & Society 28(1): 24–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora and Breeze, Ruth. 2022. “Gender and politics in a digitalized world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs.” Discourse & Society 33 (3): 303–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora. 2022. “The visual semiotics of digital misogyny: female leaders in the Viewfinder”. Feminist Media Studies 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabella and Fairclough, Norman. 2012. Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, Pamela. 1978. “Interaction: The work women do”. Social Problems 251: 397–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henaku, Nancy and Pappoe, Ruby. 2022. “African rhetoric as an emergent subfield: A review of literature and reflections on critical issues. In A Companion to African Rhetoric, edited by Segun Ige, Gilbert Motsaathebe and Omedi Ochieng pp. 171–194. Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1992. “Women’s talk in public contexts”. Discourse & Society 3(2): 131–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, Jessica. 2018. “Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis”. Review of Communication 18(3):193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jagger, Alison. 2002. “Challenging women’s global inequalities: Some priorities for Western philosophers”. Philosophical Topics 30(2): 229–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and influence in state legislative policy making: the interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates”. American Political Science Review 88(3): 560–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika and Semino, Elena. 2009. “Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany”. In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, pp. 9–35. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2021. “Xenophobia, misogyny and rape culture: Targeting women in cyberspace”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 76–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and women’s place. Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle. 2007. “Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis”. Critical Discourse Studies 4(2): 141–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Elvin. 2009. “Gendered metaphors of women in power: The case of Hillary Clinton as Madonna, unruly woman, bitch and witch. In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, pp. 259–269. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedo, Litiane and de Carvalho Figueiredo, Débora. 2021. “‘I can’t use this word feminism because I think it is too strong’: Discourse and evaluative language on feminism in narratives of gender produced by Cape Verdean academics”. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 109–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2014. “Media discourse and de/coloniality: A post- foundational approach”. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Caps. pp. 385–405. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Fissures in the discourse-scape: Critique, rationality and validity in post-foundational approaches to CDS|”. Discourse & Society 27(3): 262–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel. and Borker, Ruth. 1982. “A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication”. In Language and Social Identity, edited by John Gumperz, pp. 196–216. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maniglio, Francesco and da Silva, Rosimeire Barboza. 2021. “Critical discourse analysis and the decolonial turn. Why and what for?Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 156–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nartey, Mark. 2021. “A feminist critical discourse analysis of Ghanaian feminist blogs”. Feminist Media Studies 21(4): 657–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Investigating emancipatory discourses in action: The need for an interventionist approach and an activist-scholar posture”. Critical Discourse Studies 19(5): 459–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023a. Political myth-making, populist performance and nationalist resistance: Examining Kwame Nkrumah’s construction and promotion of the African Dream. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. ed. 2023b. Voice, agency and resistance: Emancipatory discourses in action. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo. 2018. Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ngula, Richmond. 2021. ‘“If you ride a lame horse into a race’ …: a corpus-based analysis of metaphors in John Mahama’s political speeches”. Language, Discourse & Society 9 (2): 157–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nownes, Anthony and Freeman, Patricia. 1998. “Female lobbyists: Women in the world of ‘Good 01’ Boys”. The Journal of politics 60(4): 1181–1201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Arredondo, Carolina and Graells-Garrido, Eduardo. 2021. “Twitter and abortion: Online hate against pro-choice female politicians in Chile”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9(1): 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietikainen, Sari & Dufva, Hannele. 2006. “Voices in discourses: Dialogism, critical discourse analysis and ethnic identity”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(2): 205–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randour, François, Perez, Julien and Reuchamps, Min. 2020. “Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research”. Discourse & Society 31(4): 428–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojas-Lizana, Sol and Dolhare, María. 2021. “What’s in a preamble? Decolonial thinking in the preambles of the Bolivian and Ecuadorean constitutions: A discourse analytic approach”. Critical Discourse Studies 18(1): 43–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutazibwa, Olivia. 2020. “Hidden in plain sight: Coloniality, capitalism and race/ism as far as the eye can see”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 48(2): 221–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. 2002. Language and gender in political debates in the House of Commons. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1980. Man made language. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t understand! Women and men in conversation. Virago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Gender and language in the workplace”. In Gender and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, pp. 81–105. Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Pas, Daphne and Aaldering, Loes. 2020. “Gender differences in political media coverage: A meta-analysis”. Journal of Communication 70(1): 114–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1997. “What is political discourse analysis?” In Political Linguistics, edited by Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen, pp. 11–52. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Political discourse and cognition”. In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, edited by Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner, pp. 203–237. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, Clare. 2001. Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organizations. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, Candace. and Zimmerman, Don. 1987. “Doing gender”. Gender and Society 11: 125–5l. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 2001. “Political discourse”. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton, pp. 389–415. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wortham, Stanton and Gadsden, Vivian. 2006. “Urban fathers positioning themselves through narrative: An approach to narrative self-construction”. In Discourse and Identity, edited by En Anna de Finna, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg, pp. 314–341. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue