Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:2 (2023) ► pp.245–267

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Identifying the discursive trajectory of social change – a systematic discourse theoretical framework

ORCiD logo with link | Victoria University of Wellington
ORCiD logo with link | Victoria University of Wellington
Published online: 16 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22138.sul
Abstract
This article has two main objectives. One, to advance methodological development in both discourse theory and media and communications research by proposing an eclectic, replicable methodology. Two, to demonstrate how to apply that methodology to furnish both ontic and ontological explanations for the contingent origins of a discourse using the editorials of the Pakistani newspaper The Nation on the Pakistan Steel Mills privatization case as a case study. An earlier study had identified the surprising conclusion that this traditionally conservative paper had from the outset fully endorsed the radical opposition to the government’s suspension of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan which led to an uprising known as the Lawyers’ Movement. This article locates the origins of that shift in the newspaper’s reaction to the Pakistan Steel Mills privatization issue. The article has implications for the fields of discourse theory, media and communication studies, and political science.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse theory’s methodological progression: An overview
  • 3.Discourse, discourses, and The Nation’s editorial discourse
  • 4.Sedimentation, the logics approach, and language
  • 5.Frames, framing, and discourse
  • 6.Categories of frames
  • 7.Situating news media discourse in the social
  • 8.Context of this study
    • 8.1Historical context of Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) privatization case
    • 8.2Ontological context: Why investigate The Nation’s discourse on PSM privatization case?
  • 9.Data & methodology
    • Stage I: Frame analysis
      • Step 1: Initial textual analysis
      • Step 2: Explanation of ‘frame complex’
      • Step 3: Identification of blind spots
    • Stage II: Contextualized self-interpretations
    • Stage III: Identification of logics
  • 10.Linguistic analysis
    • 10.1Characterization
      • 10.1.1Government
      • 10.1.2Supreme Court
      • 10.1.3Pakistan Steel Mills
      • 10.1.4Privatization
    • 10.2Argumentation
    • 10.3Figuration
      • 10.3.1Sarcasm
      • 10.3.2Hyperbole
    • 10.4Analysis of frame complex
    • 10.5Identification of blind spots
  • 11.Contextualized self-interpretations (journalist frame)
  • 12.Explanation of the logics
  • 13.Conclusion: Establishing the contours of a conflict
  • References
References (58)
References
Ahmed, Zahid Shahab, and Maria J. Stephan. 2010. “Fighting for the Rule of Law: Civil Resistance and the Lawyers’ Movement in Pakistan.” Democratization 17 (3): 492–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashraf, Muhammad Junaid, Faiza Muhammad, and Trevor Hopper. 2018. “Accounting Signifiers, Political Discourse, Popular Resistance and Legal Identity during Pakistan Steel Mills Attempted Privatization.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 601: 18–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Michael, and Paul D’Angelo. 2018. “Defragmenting News Framing Research.” In Doing News Framing Analysis II, edited by Paul D’Angelo, 90–111. Florence: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar. 2016. “The End of Framing as We Know It … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication & Society 19 (1): 7–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carragee, Kevin M. 2019. “Communication, Activism and the News Media: An Agenda for Future Research.” Communication & Society 32 (4): 361–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carragee, Kevin M., and Wim Roefs. 2004. “The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research.” Journal of Communication 54 (2): 214–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheema, Moeen H. 2016. “The ‘Chaudhry Court’: Deconstructing the ‘Judicialization of Politics’ in Pakistan.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 25 (3): 447–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “Courting Constitutionalism: The Politics of Judicial Review in Pakistan.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Chong, Dennis and James N. Druckman. 2007. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57(1): 99–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln, and Sean Phelan, eds. 2011. Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Paul. 2002. “News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program: A Response to Entman.” Journal of Communication 52 (4): 870–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Framing Theory and Journalism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited by T. P. Vos and F. Hanusch, 1–10. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Paul, Jack Lule, W. Russell Neuman, Lulu Rodriguez, Daniela V. Dimitrova, and Kevin M. Carragee. 2019. “Beyond Framing: A Forum for Framing Researchers.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96 (1): 12–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Paul, and Donna Shaw. 2018. “Journalism as Framing.” In Journalism, edited by Tim P. Vos, 205–34. De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2021. “Moving Discourse Theory Forward: A Five-Track Proposal for Future Research.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1): 22–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost 24 (4): 301–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 2003. “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11.” Political Communication 20 (4): 415–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghias, Shoaib A. 2010. “Miscarriage of Chief Justice: Judicial Power and the Legal Complex in Pakistan under Musharraf.” Law & Social Inquiry 35 (4): 985–1022. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez. 2020. “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1):1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David, Jason Glynos, and Steven Griggs. 2016. “Discourse, Explanation and Critique.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (1): 99–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huckin, Thomas. 2002. “Textual Silence and the Discourse of Homelessness.” Discourse & Society 13 (3): 347–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. “Conservatism as an Ideology.” The American Political Science Review 51 (2): 454–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S. 2004. News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalhan, Anil. 2013. “‘Gray Zone’ Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 46 (1): 1–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kishwar, Munir, and Iram Khalid. 2018. “Judicial Activism in Pakistan: A Case Study of Supreme Court Judgments 2008–13.” South Asian Studies 33 (2): 321–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2018. “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 76–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2011. “From Media to Mediality: Mediatic (Counter-)Apparatuses and the Concept of the Political in Communication Studies.” In Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, edited by Lincoln Dahlberg and Sean Phelan. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marttila, Tomas. 2016. Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Note. 2010. “The Pakistani Lawyers’ Movement and the Popular Currency of Judicial Power.” Harvard Law Review 1231: 1705–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Yeheng, Michaël Opgenhaffen, and Baldwin Van Gorp. 2019. “Negotiating Climate Change: A Frame Analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese News Media.” Public Understanding of Science 28 (5): 519–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Zhongdang, and Gerald M. Kosicki. 1993. “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication 101: 55–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qazi, Asher Asif. 2018. “A Government of Judges: A Story of the Pakistani Supreme Court’s Strategic Expansion.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Remling, Elise. 2018. “Logics, Assumptions and Genre Chains: A Framework for Poststructuralist Policy Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saharov, Juhan. 2021. “Combining Laclauian Discourse Analysis and Framing Theory: Vaclav Havel’s ‘Hegemonic Rhetoric’ in Charter 77.” Czech Journal of Political Science 28(2): 186–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheufele, Bertram. 2004. “Framing Effects Research: A Theoretical and Methodical Critique.” Communications – European Journal of Communication Research 29(4). 401–428.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49(1): 103–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram A., and Shanto Iyengar. 2017. “The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shafqat, Sahar. 2018. “Civil Society and the Lawyers’ Movement of Pakistan.” Law & Social Inquiry 43 (03): 889–914. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley. 2014. “Alternative Theories: Constructivism, Marxism and Critical Approaches.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, 42–55. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sulehry, Rizwan S., and Derek Wallace. 2022. “Using Frame Analysis to Operationalize Discourse Theory for Critical News Media Research.” Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations 23 (3): 7–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Nation. 2006a. “Digging Up PSM Sale,” May 25, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. “Historic Verdict,” June 24, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006c. “Privatisation Concerns,” July 9, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006d. “Disregarding Dissent,” August 3, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006e. “Government in a Fix,” August 11, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006f. “Seeking Review,” September 9, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Brussel, Leen, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen, eds. 2019. Communication and Discourse Theory: Collected Works of The Brussels Discourse Theory Group. Bristol: Intellect. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vreese, Claes H. de. 2005. “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information Design Journal + Document Design 13 (1): 51–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaidi, S. Akbar. 2008. “An Emerging Civil Society?” Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 38–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan. 2014. “Articulating Metalinguistic and Political Awareness in Flemish Discourses on Integration and Allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (3): 283–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2025. Transformative Impacts of AI in Social Media and Corporate Communication Strategies. In Transformative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Management Information Systems [Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, ], ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue