Cover not available

Article published In: Culture of Sustainability and Discourses of Social Change
Edited by Franzisca Weder
[Journal of Language and Politics 22:5] 2023
► pp. 622–639

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Rhetorical (ir)responsibility in the Australian Parliament

Resurrecting Aristotle’s deliberative rhetoric as means to ethical, rational, and constructive climate change debate

ORCiD logo with link | University of Queensland
ORCiD logo with link | University of Queensland
Published online: 30 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22127.mcl
Abstract
In this conceptual paper, we differentiate between political decisions and the conversations where these decisions are discussed and facilitated. We complement existing work on argumentation in political communication by applying Aristotle’s Rhetoric to the study of climate change debate. We show how Aristotle’s principles for ethical and rational political speech work toward audience trust and encourage deliberative debate and decision-making. Our deliberative perspective is supported by a case study analysis of Australia’s parliamentary climate change debate. We resurrect Aristotle’s Rhetoric both as an analytical tool for critical analysis and a potential framework for constructive climate change debate. Following the conceptualisation of parliamentary debate as a conversational space where decision-making processes are facilitated, we introduce Aristotle’s Rhetoric and the concept of ‘rhetorical responsibility’, which is further explored and exemplified in the case study. We conclude with future research questions for discourse and political communication studies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Climate change and political discourse
  • 2.Political communication, political speech, argumentation, ethics, and Aristotle
    • 2.1Political communication in the context of Aristotle’s Rhetoric
    • 2.2Argumentation, political speech, and ethics
    • 2.3Climate change debate and ‘Aristotelian’ approaches
  • 3.Aristotle’s deliberative rhetoric: Conviction through argumentative character
    • 3.1Rational grounding for ethical political speech: Pistis, branches, and topics
    • 3.2Practical reasoning shows character
    • 3.3Emotional appeals support deliberation
    • 3.4Logos: Principles of argumentation, and the character of maxims
  • 4.Case study: Rhetorical (ir)responsibility in the climate change debate
    • 4.1Anthony Albanese (Labor Party Opposition leader, Member for Grayndler)
    • 4.2Tim Wilson (Liberal Party, Assistant Minister to the Minister for Industry, Energy and Emissions Reduction, Member for Goldstein)
  • 5.Discussion, outlook, and limitations
  • References
References (35)
References
Aristotle. 1984. “Rhetoric” (translated by W. Rhys Roberts). In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edited by Johnathan Barnes, 2152–269. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Roger, and Marguerite Tarzia. 2010. “The politics and science of climate change.” Parliament of Australia. Retrieved from [URL]
Beeson, Mark, and Matt McDonald. 2013. “The Politics of Climate Change in Australia.” Australian Journal of Politics & History, 591: 331–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borden, Sandra L. 2008. Journalism as Practice: Macintyre, Virtue Ethics and the Press. Milton, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2021. An Ethics of Political Communication (1st ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Melissa. 2021. “Australia Faces International Punishment for Lagging on Climate Change Action, Former Un Chief Warns.” ABC, August 17, 2021. [URL]
Colvin, Rebecca, and Frank Jotzo. 2021. “Australian voters’ attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants.” PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Aeron. 2019. Political communication: A new introduction for crisis times. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLuca, Kevin. 1999. “Articulation Theory: A Discursive Grounding for Rhetorical Practice.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 32(4): 334–48. [URL]
Fenner, R. A. 2021. “Engineers as advocates for sustainable development: countering misinformation and the need for Aristotelian rhetoric.” Paper presented at the ‘EESD2021’, University College Cork, Ireland, 14–16 June. [URL]
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2011. “Case study.” In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed, pp. 301–316. CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard (ed). 2019. The far right and the environment: Politics, discourse and communication. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foss, Sonja K. 2005. “Theory of Visual Rhetoric.” In Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media, ed. by Ken Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Gretchen Barbatsis and Keith Kenney, 141–52. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaines, Robert N. 2000. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric and the Contemporary Arts of Practical Discourse.” In Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. by Alan. G. Gross and Arthur. E. Walzer. Carbondale, US: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garver, Eugene. 1994. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruen, Nicholas. 2019. “Polarisation and the Case for Citizens’ Juries.” Quillette, Feb 16, 2019. [URL]
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research.” Communication theory 16(4): 411–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Lynn, Leah Whalin, Angela Burks, Yvonne Heather Burry, Jennifer L. Herman, and Deborah Kuzawa. 2016. A Guide to Technical Communications: Strategies & Applications. Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2023. “Urgent climate action can secure a liveable future for all.” Newsroom. Retrieved from [URL]
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Kate Kenski. 2014. “Political Communication: Then, Now, and Beyond.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, ed. by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jezierska, Katarzyna. 2020. “With habermas against habermas. Deliberation without consensus.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 15(1): Article 13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, Christopher Lyle. 1980. “An Aristotelian Trilogy: Ethics, Rhetoric, Politics, and the Search for Moral Truth.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 13(1): 1–24. [URL]
Jones, Barry. 2013. “A Values Deficit, Toxic Politics, and the Climate Change Debacle.” The Conversation, Nov 11, 2013. [URL]
Kitaeva, Elena, and Olga Ozerova. 2019. “Intertextuality in Political Discourse.” In Language, Power, and Ideology in Political Writing: Emerging Research and Opportunities, ed. by Önder Çakirtaş, 143–70. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knape, Joachim. 2012. Modern Rhetoric in Culture, Arts, and Media: 13 Essays (Translated by Alan L. Fortuna). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2000. Argumentationstheorie zur Einführung. Hamburg, Germany: Junius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2014. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landrum, Nancy E., Connor Tomaka and John McCarthy. 2016. “Analyzing the Religious War of Words over Climate Change.” Journal of Macromarketing, 36(4): 471–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1994. Review of Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An art of character, by Eugene Garver. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An art of character Chicago, 1994: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paliewicz, Nicholas. S., & George, F. (Guy) McHendry, Jr. 2020. “Post-dialectics and fascistic argumentation in the global climate change debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 56(3): 137–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pepermans, Yves, and Pieter Maeseele. 2016. “The Politicization of Climate Change: Problem or Solution?” WIREs Climate Change 7(4): 478–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2021. “‘Narrative! I can’t hear that anymore.’ A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change.” Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3): 368–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segal, Judy Z. 1991. “The structure of advocacy: a study of environmental rhetoric.” Canadian journal of communication, 16(3/4), 408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speck, Desley Louise. 2010. “A hot topic? Climate change mitigation policies, politics, and the media in Australia.” Human Ecology Review, 17(2): 125–134.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, Lynda. 2015. “The visual rhetoric of climate change.” WIREs Climate Change, 6(4): 361–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
2025. Fear-based self-legitimation in the institutional climate change discourse: Case study of the European Parliament’s online communication. Parliamentary Affairs DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue