Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:4 (2023) ► pp.534–558
Inside the echo chamber
Legitimation tactics in the People’s Daily commentaries about the China-USA trade dispute
Published online: 7 February 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22119.che
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22119.che
Abstract
In the context of the China-USA trade dispute, this study reports a discourse analysis of legitimation tactics used in the People’s Daily, a major English-language news outlet produced by the Communist Party of China (CPC). My analysis centres on a dataset of 65 commentaries between March 2018 and January 2020, and identifies the five key tactics at work: authorization, moralization, rationalization, hypothetical future, and integration. These tactics (and their sub-tactics) are deployed for delegitimating the US-initiated “America First” trade policy, and for legitimating the Chinese state’s position and countermeasures. Orienting to Western scholarship about the news media’s role as an “echo chamber” for State/political agendas, I compare the pattern of legitimation in the People’s Daily commentaries with the pattern previously found in an analysis of Chinese state white papers. This comparison highlights key similarities but also differences in terms of genre, language, and ideological coherence.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The China-USA trade dispute
- 3.Discursive construction of legitimation and recontextualization of discourse
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Tactics of (de-)legitimation in the People’s Daily commentaries
- 5.1.1Authorization
- 5.1.2Moralization
- 5.1.3Rationalization
- 5.1.4Hypothetical future
- 5.1.5Integration
- 5.2Legitimation patterns – the People’s Daily and state white papers
- 5.1Tactics of (de-)legitimation in the People’s Daily commentaries
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (48)
Beciu, Camelia, and Mirela Lazăr. 2022. “’We’ in the EU:(De) legitimizing power relations and status: The case of the 2019 European elections in Romania.” Journal of Language and Politics 21(2): 300–319.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text & Talk 26(6): 635–660.
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Bernstein, B. 1990. Class, Codes and Control, Vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
Boulianne, Shelley, Karolina Koc-Michalska, and Bruce Bimber. 2020. “Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Western democracies.” New media & society 22(4): 683–699.
Chafe, Wallace L., and Johanna Nichols (eds.) 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chen, Fu and Guofeng Wang. 2022. “A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily.” Critical Discourse Studies 19(1): 1–18.
Chen, Lijuan, Danyang Zhang, Yingfei He, and Guoliang Zhang. 2020. “Transcultural political communication from the perspective of proximization theory: A comparative analysis on the corpuses of the Sino–US trade dispute.” Discourse & Communication 14(4): 341–361.
Cheng, Xi. 2021. “Legitimation strategies in discourse surrounding Sino-American trade friction: A case study of Chinese government white papers.” Discourse & Communication 15(3): 241–259.
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(9).
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank. 2018. “The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media.” Information, Communication & Society 21(5): 729–745.
Enli, Gunn. 2017. “New media and politics.” Annals of the International Communication Association 41(3–4): 220–227.
Garimella, Kiran, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. 2018. “Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship.” In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 913–922. [URL].
Guan, Tianru. 2018. “Framing the Boundary of Sino-Japanese Conflicts in China’s Communication Sphere: A Content Analysis of the News Coverage of Japan and Sino-Japanese Controversies by the People’s Daily between 2001 and 2015.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 231: 603–618.
Guo, Zhongshi, and Yu Huang. 2002. “Hybridized Discourse: Social Openness and Functions of English Media in Post-Mao China.” World Englishes 21(2): 217–230.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Igwebuike, Ebuka Elias, and Ameh Dennis Akoh. 2022. “Self-legitimation and other-delegitimation in the internet radio speeches of the supreme leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra.” Critical Discourse Studies 19(6): 575–592.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2008. Echo Chamber : Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online.
Kim, Min-hyung. 2019. “A real driver of US–China trade conflict: The Sino–US competition for global hegemony and its implications for the future.” International Trade, Politics and Development 3(1): 30–40.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2014. “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: a Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics 24(3): 345–365.
. 2016. “Recontextualization of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society 27(3): 308–321.
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualisations and blending of voices in professional discourse.” Text & Talk 18 (2). 143–157.
Liu, Xinsheng, and Yi Edward Yang. 2015. “Examining China’s Official Media Perception of the United States: A Content Analysis of People’s Daily Coverage.” Journal of Chinese Political Science, 201: 385–408.
Mackay, Rowan R. 2015. “Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence.” Discourse & Society 26(3): 323–348.
Manosuthikit, Aree. 2021. “Legitimation strategies and discourses in editorials: Myanmar’s new foreign policy on ASEAN membership.” Discourse, Context & Media 401: 1–11.
Martin, James Robert, and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martín-Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk. 1997. “’There was a problem, and it was solved!’: legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse.” Discourse & Society 8(4): 523–566.
Mayer, Jane. 2019. “The Making of the Fox News White House: Fox News has always been partisan. But has it become propaganda?” The New Yorker, March 4, 2019. [URL]
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid. 2017. “Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(5): 706–730.
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: from words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807.
Song, Jianlin, and James Paul Gee. 2019. “Slogans with Chinese characteristics: the political functions of a discourse form.” Discourse & Society 31(2): 201–217.
Strömbäck, Jesper., and Esser Frank. 2014. “Mediatization of politics: transforming democracies and reshaping politics.” In Mediatization of communication, edited. by Knut Lundby, 375–404. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tong, Jingrong. 2014. “Discourse of journalism and legitimacy in post-reform China.” In Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China, edited by Qing Cao, Hailong. Tian, and Pau. Chilton, 123–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118.
Wang, Guofeng. 2020. “Legitimization strategies in China’s official media: the 2018 vaccine scandal in China.” Social Semiotics 30(5): 685–698.
Wang, Hong, and Yunfeng Ge. 2019. “Negotiating national identities in conflict situations: The discursive reproduction of China-USA trade dispute in China’s news reports.” Discourse & Communication 14(1): 65–83.
Wang, Yuzhu, and Fangfei Jiang. 2019. “特朗普政府的经济单边主义及其影响.” [Economic unilateralism of the Trump administration and its impact]. International Studies 41: 110–122. [URL]
Yu, Wen. 2019. “完善坚持正确导向的舆论引导工作机制.” [Improving the public opinion guidance working mechanism that adheres to the correct orientation]. Cyberspace Administration of China, December 17, 2019. [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
