Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.197–218
The groundwork of Putin’s war
Mental models and ideological references in Vladimir Putin’s “Crimean” speech
Published online: 31 August 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22110.men
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22110.men
Abstract
Every ideology aims at constructing specific representations of reality that many people can easily adopt. In this paper, mental models described as cognitive representations of reality are used to explain how people come to their beliefs. Applying Johnson-Laird’s theoretical concept, I present mental models reconstructed by means of a qualitative analysis of key lexemes in the Crimean speech of Vladimir Putin held in 2014. This reconstruction reveals how the mental models in question target a shared social cognition among listeners using ideologically loaded references articulated in the speech. Furthermore, tracing ideological references allows a preliminary insight into how the speaker aims to affect the discourse formation process of the time. This reconstruction is indispensable to gain a better understanding of the Russian attack on Ukraine, eight years later.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theory and tools: Mental models and their ideological application
- 3.Ideological references in discourse
- 4.Method: Key lexemes and cognitive mapping
- 5.Putin’s Crimean speech and its claim on ideological premise
- 5.1Situational setting
- 5.2Framing the issue
- 6.Mental models and reference strategies
- 6.1Lexeme “Crimea”
- 6.2Lexeme “Ukrainian authorities”
- 6.3Lexeme “our Western partners”
- 7.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (81)
Albrecht, Jason. E., and Edward J. O’Brien. 1993. “Updating a Mental Model: Maintaining Both Local and Global Coherence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 191: 1061–1070.
Blakkisrud, Helge. 2016. “Blurring the Boundary Between Civic and Ethnic: The Kremlin’s New Approach to National Identity under Putin’s Third Term.” The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000–20151: 249–274.
Cameron, Lynne, and Graham Low. (eds.) 1999. Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlton, Eric. 1984. “Ideologies as Belief Systems.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 4 (2): 17–29.
Chaisity, Paul and Stephen Whitefield. 2015. “Putin’s Nationalism Problem.” E- International Relations, [URL]
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chomski, Noam. 1997. Media Control. The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Collins, Allan, and Dedre Gentner. 1987. “How People Construct Mental Models.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland, and Naomi Quinn, 243–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Vega, Manuel. 1995. “Backward Updating of Mental Models during Continuous Reading of Narratives.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 211: 373–385.
Drozdova, Oksana, and Paul Robinson. 2019. “A Study of Vladimir Putin’s Rhetoric.” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (5): 805–823.
Dutke, Stephan. 1993. “Mentale Modelle beim Erinnern sprachlich beschriebener räumlicher Anordnungen: Zur Interaktion von Gedächtnisschemata und Textrepräsentation.” Zeitschrift für experimentelle and angewandte Psychologie 401: 44–71.
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail. New York: Academic Press.
Evans, Alfred B. Jr. 2008. “Putin’s Legacy and Russia’s Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 899–912.
. 1994. Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, Erika L., and Mary Hegarty. 1994. “Properties of Cognitive Maps Constructed from Texts.” Memory and Cognition 221: 455–473.
Finlayson, Alan. 2012. “Rhetoric and the Political Theory of Ideologies.” Political Studies 601: 751–767.
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Gerard J. Steen. (eds.) 1999. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2014. After Newspeak. Language Culture and Politics in Russia from Gorbachev to Putin. Itacha, London: Cornell University Press.
2017. “Humpty Dumpty and the Troll Factory: Varieties of Verbal Subversion on the Russian-Language Internet.” Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 731: 79–103.
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Herspring, Dale R. 2007. Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koteyko, Nelya, and Lara Ryazanova-Clarke. 2009. “The Path and Building Metaphors in the Speeches of Vladimir Putin: Back to the Future?”. Slavonica 15 (2): 112–127.
Kosslyn, Stephen M. 1994. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuße, Holger. 2019. Aggression and Argumentation. Mit Beispielen aus dem russisch ukrainischen Konflikt (Slavistische Beiträge). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
Makhashvili, Levan. 2017. “The Russian Information War and Propaganda Narratives in the European Union and the EU’s Eastern Partnership Countries.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 7 (5): 309–313.
March, Luke. 2012. “Nationalism for Export? The Domestic and Foreign-Policy Implications of the New ‘Russian Idea’”, Europe-Asia Studies 64(3): 401–425.
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation in the Human Representation of Visual Information. San Francisco: Freeman.
Matthews, Owen. 2014. “Putin to Russia: We Will Bury Ourselves”, Newsweek, 6 Decembe: [URL]
Maynard, Jonathan Leader. 2013. “A Map of the Field of Ideological Analysis”, Journal of Political Ideologies 18(3): 299–327.
McNamara, Timothy, Diana L. Miller, and John D. Bransford. 1991. “Mental Models and Reading Comprehension.” In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 21, ed. by Rebecca Barr, Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal, P. David Pearson, 490–511. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Motyl, Alexander J. 2016. “Putin’s Russia as a Fascist Political System.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49 (1): 25–36.
Oates, Sarah. 2016. “Russian Media in the Digital Age: Propaganda Rewired.” Russian Politics 1 (4): 398–417.
Pasitselska, Olga. 2017. “Ukrainian Crisis through the Lens of Russian Media: Construction of Ideological Discourse.” Discourse & Communication 11 (6): 591–609.
Rak, Joanna, and Roman Bäcker. 2020. “Theory behind Russian Quest for Totalitarianism. Analysis of Discursive Swing in Putin’s Speeches.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 53 (1): 13–26.
Rickheit, Gert, and Lorenz Sichelschmidt. 1999. “Mental Models: Some Answers, Some Questions, Some Suggestions.” In Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning, ed. by Gert Rickheit, and Christopher Habel, 9–40. Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier.
Robinson, Neil, and Sarah Milne. 2017. “Populism and Political Development in Hybrid Regimes: Russia and the Development of Official Populism.” International Political Science Review 38 (4): 412–425.
Rogov, Kirill. 2018. “The Art of Coercion: Repressions and Repressiveness in Putin’s Russia.” Russian Politics 3(2): 151–174.
Rouse, William B., and Nancy M. Morris. 1986. “On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models.” Psychological Bulletin 1001: 349–363.
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara. 2004. “Criminal Rhetoric in Russian Political Discourse.” Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics 61: 141–160.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1969. “Politics, Ideology and Belief Systems.” American Political Science Review 63 (2): 398 – 411.
Shlapentokh, Dmitry V. 2014. “Implementation of an Ideological Paradigm: Early Duginian Eurasianism and Russia’s Post-Crimean Discourse.” Contemporary Security Policy 35 (3): 380–399.
Schnotz, Wolfgang. 1988. “Textverstehen als Aufbau Mentaler Modelle.” In Wissenspsychologie, ed. by Heinz Mandl, and Hans Spada, 299–330. München: Psychologie Verlag Union.
Skinner, Quentin. 1974. “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” Political Theory 21: 277–303.
Tarrow, Sidney. 2013. The Language of Contention: Revolutions in Words. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Holly A., and Barbara Tversky. 1992. “Spatial Mental Models Derived from Survey and Route Descriptions.” Journal of Memory and Language 311: 261–292.
Tully, James H. 1983. “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 131: 489–509.
Van der Vet, Freek. 2018. “When They Come for You”: Legal Mobilization in New Authoritarian Russia.” Law & Society Review, 521: 301–336.
2008. Discourse and Context. A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
2013. “Ideology and Discourse.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, ed. by Michael Freeden, and Lyman Tower Sargent, and Marc Stears, 175–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Herpen, Marcel H. 2015. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Van Leeuwen, Theodore Jacob. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112.
Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
. 2015. “Ideology in Discourse.” In: The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, 1–10. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth. 2006. “Blaming and Denying: Pragmatics.” In: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Edward K. Brown, 59–64. Oxford: Elsevier.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Mennecke, Olga & Beatrix Kreß
Kusse, Holger
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
