Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.283–305

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

BIOMETRIC CITIZENS in smart cities

Re-evaluating citizens’ conceptualizations in smart cities policies as extended metaphorical arguments

ORCiD logo with link | Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport
Published online: 28 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22097.faw
Abstract
This article addresses the socio-cognitive conceptualizations of the notion of ‘citizenship’ within the space of smart cities. It discusses how smart cities expos are endowed with ideological bearings that mark a shift in these conceptualizations. This ideological shift is explored in the policy releases of Barcelona expo media centre 2019/2020 as retrieved from the Smart City Expo World Congress website. The framework accounts for the socio-cognitive aspects that are brought to the smart expos’ discussions, reframing it within the paradigms of Posthumanism and neoliberal urbanism. It is found that citizenship within smart city discourse is characterized by series of subjugating conflations between biovalues and biometrics, the body, technology, and the city and the citizen. These subjugations are discovered by contesting the metaphors of CITIZEN-FOCUSED URBANISM, VULNERABLE CITIZENS, and TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONISM with their reframed counterparts of BIOMETRIC CITIZEN, INFRASTRUCTURE CITIZENSHIP, and TECHNOLOGICAL PATERNALISM.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Smart city ideals: Colluding neoliberal urbanism with Posthuman citizenship
  • 3.Practical reasoning arguments
  • 4.Data selection and analytical procedures
    • 4.1Analytical procedures
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Citizen-focused urbanism
    • 5.2Technological solutionism
    • 5.3Reframing values as Posthuman practices in a neoliberal urbanism
      • 5.3.1Citizen-focused urbanism biometric citizen
      • 5.3.2Vulnerable citizens’ utopia infrastructure citizenship
      • 5.3.3Technological solutionism technological paternalism
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (73)
References
Primary sources
“it’s 2021. why are public spaces & roads still unsafe for women?” 2021a. Tomorrow City. [URL]
“Technology To Improve Citizens’ Lives: The Case of The Montevideo Beaches.” 2021b. Tomorrow City. [URL]
Alonso, Tania. 2020. “Paul Duan, Co-Founder and President of Bayes Impact: ‘We Should Trust in The Power Of The Multitude.’” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Bravo, David. 2019. “Social Score System: A Tool to Oppress or Reward Citizens?” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Euklidiadas, Martínez. 2021. “Coworking Spaces: How Cities Are Adapting to This New Work Concept.” [URL]
Fuldauer, Esther. 2019. “Citizens at The Heart of Smart Cities.” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Herranz, Arantxa. 2019a. “Can We Combat Poverty with An App?” Tomorrow City. [URL]
. 2019b. “Citizens Policing Our Streets: Is It Lawful to Report the Inappropriate Use of Cities?” Tomorrow City. [URL]
. 2020. Pontus Westerberg, UN-Habitat: “People Need to Be Allowed To Offer Their Own Solutions To The Problems In The Places In Which They Live.” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Liceras, Patricia. 2019. “Technology in Schools with An Impact in And Out of The Classrooms.” Tomorrow City. [URL]
. 2021. “Helsinki: Opening New Frontiers in Digital Tourism.” Tomorrow City, [URL]
Martínez, Marcos. 2019a. Pablo Soto, regional representative of Transparency and Participation in Madrid: “Technology Should Be Used to Enhance Institutions.” Tomorrow City [URL]
. 2019b. Will There Be a Digital Divide Between Smart and Dumb Cities? Tomorrow City. [URL]
. 2021. “Cities Are Aging with Their Population: Challenges And Solutions For An Inverted Pyramid” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Ramos, Jaime. 2021a. “Surveillance Cameras in Public Spaces: Are They A Good Idea?” Tomorrow City. [URL]
. 2021b. “How Can Cities Improve the Quality Of Life Of Disabled People?” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Secondary sources
Ajana, Btihaj. 2012. “Biometric Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 16 (7): 851–870, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D. 2018. Citizenship. In Public Entrepreneurship, Citizenship, and Self-Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso, R. Garcia, and Sebastian Castro. 2016. “Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy”. In Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edited by Ramon, J. Gil-Garcia, 333–347. Springer Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (2): 801–831. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berntzen, Lasse, and Marius Johannessen. 2016. “The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway.” In Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edited by Ramon, J. Gil-Garcia, 299–314. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil and Nik Theodore. 2005. “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition.” City 9(1): 101–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Bruce. 2014. “A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in an Age of Climate Change.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 321: 49–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunn, Alison. 2017. “Subaltern Bodies in the Digital Urban Imaginary.” In Architecture and Feminisms: Ecologies, Economies, Technologies, edited by Hélène Frichot, Catharina Gabrielsson, Helen Runting, 106–111. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardullo, Paolo. 2020. Citizens in the ’Smart City: Participation, Co – Production, Governance. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardullo, Paolo and Rob Kitchin. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(5): 813–830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Robert T. 2019. “Models of Communication in and as Metadiscourse.” In Models of Communication: Theoretical and Philosophical Approaches, edited by Mats Bergman, Kęstas Kirtiklis, and Johan Siebers. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “Post-Script on Societies of Control.” October 591: 3–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobbins, Michel. 2009. “Urban Design and People.” Journal of the American Planning Association 77(4): 386–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estlund, David. 2021. “Epistocratic Paternalism.” In Political Epistemology, edited by Elizabeth Edenberg and Michael Hannon, 97–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method of Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Working paper. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Change in Management Discourse and Ideology: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Strategic Critique.” Available online at: [URL]
Fors, Anna. 2012. “The Ontology of the Subject in Digitalization.” In Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society, edited by Rocci Luppicini. 45–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossi, Giuseppe and Daniela Pianezzi. 2017. “Smart Cities: Utopia or Neoliberal Ideology?” Cities 691: 79–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillem, Susana M. 2009. “Argumentation, Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political Communication.” Discourse & Society 20 (6): 727–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin and Richard Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” The British Journal of Sociology 511, 605–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Symbiogenesis, Sympoiesis, and Art Science Activisms for Staying with the Trouble.” In Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet, edited by Anna Tsing, Elaine Gan, Nils Bubandt, and Heather Swanson, M25–M50. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, Colin, Barbara Eckman, Rick Hamilton, Perry Hartswick, Jayant Kalagnanam, Jurij Paraszczak, and Peter Williams. 2010. “Foundations for Smarter Cities.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 54 (4): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1975. “The Meaning of Questions.” Languages 511: 17–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, James J. 2004. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. New York, NY, USA: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitchin, Rob, Claudio Coletta and Cavin McArdle. 2017. Urban Informatics, Governmentality and the Logics of Urban Control. Programmable City Working Paper 251. [URL].
Komninos, Nicos. 2009. “Intelligent Cities: Towards Interactive and Global Innovation Environments.” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 1 (4): 337–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Switzerland: Peter Lang Pub.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J., Lucas A. Keefer and Trevor, J. Swanson. 2017. “‘Undoing’ a Rhetorical Metaphor: Testing the Metaphor Extension Strategy,” Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 63–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latawiec, Beata, Richard Anderson, Shufeng Ma, and Kim Nguyen-Jahiel. 2016. “Influence of Collaborative Reasoning Discussions on Metadiscourse in Children’s Essays.” Text & Talk 36(10): 2016, 23–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorimer, Jamie. 2009. “Posthumanism/Posthumanistic Geographies.” International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography 81, 344–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Walton, Douglas. 2018. “Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach.” Argumentation 32 (4): 519–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2021. “Theories of Postdigital Heterogeneity: Implications for Research on Education and Datafication.” Postdigital Science and Education, 31, 660–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayes, Christopher. 2015. The Biopolitics of Lifestyle: Foucault, Ethics and Healthy Choices. Routledge: New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. 2014. To Save Everything, Click Here. New York City, NY, USA: Public Affairs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mousley, Andy. 2016. “The Posthuman.” In The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein, edited by Andrew Smith, 158–72. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nayar, Pramod. 2014. Posthumanism. London and New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Posthuman Urban Spaces in Dave Eggers’ the Circle. In Technology, Urban Space and the Networked Community, edited by Saswat Samay Das, Ananya Roy Pratihar, 197–216. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patton, Paul. 1994. “Metamorpho-Logic: Bodies and Powers in A Thousand Plateaus.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 251: 157–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore. 2012. “Reanimating Neoliberalism: Process Geographies of Neoliberalism. Soc.” Anthropol 20 (2): 177–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietra, John D. and Simon Wang. 2021. “Enough is Enough: This Cycle of Violence Has to Come to an End: Practical Reasoning in The Editorials During the Extraction Bill Crisis of Hong Kong.” Discourse & Communication 15 (4). 415–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinson, Gilles and Christelle Morel Journel. 2016. “The Neoliberal City – Theory, Evidence, Debates.” Territory, Politics, Governance 4(2): 137–153, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reigner, Hélène. 2016. “Neoliberal Rationality and Neohygienist Morality. A Foucauldian Analysis of Safe and Sustainable Urban Transport Policies in France.” Territory, Politics, Governance 4(2): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 2017. “Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4): 779–793, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Debra Benita. 2017. Posthuman Urbanism: Mapping Bodies in Contemporary City Space. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2015. Choosing not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003. The Uses of Argument. 2nd edn. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Rachel. 2008. Neoliberal Ideology: History, Concepts and Policies. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 2001. “Abductive, Presumptive and Plausible Arguments.” Informal Logic, 211: 141–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans. 2012. “The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation in Discussion.” Argumentation 26 (4): 439–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, Bart Garssen, Erik Krabbe, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. “The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.” In Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst, and Ralph, H. Johnson. 2013. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanolo, Alberto. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51(5): 883–898. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul. 1995. The Art of the Motor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Robin. 2018. “Posthuman Policies for Creative, Smart, Eco-cities? Case Studies from China.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (1): 206–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fawzy, Rania Magdi
2025. Postdigital Meantime, Silent Labor: A Semio-Lacanian Approach to Gig Workers’ Stock Photos. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique DOI logo
Misra, Sanjay, Kousik Barik, Petter Kvalvik & Per-Arne Jørgensen
2025. Smart City Surveillance: Governance Challenges in Balancing Privacy, Security, and Digital Sovereignty. In Empowering Digital Sovereignty, ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Ben Abdel Ouahab, Ikram, Lotfi Elaachak, Mohammed Bouhorma, Yasser A. Alluhaidan & Bassam Zafar
2024. 2024 Mediterranean Smart Cities Conference (MSCC), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue