Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:2 (2023) ► pp.225–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

In the name of the nobility of the cause, what I did is right

Legitimating the use of force via the hero-protector narrative used as argument

ORCiD logo with link | Department of English Literature and Linguistics, Qatar UniversityDoha
Published online: 16 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22066.eln
Abstract
Discourse-focused analyses of political communication show a complex interplay between narration and argumentation. Yet, current analytical tools fall short of accounting for the multifarious ways in which narratives perform as arguments. This paper adopts the notion narrative argument, developed in argumentation theory, to examine the ways the ‘hero-protector’ narrative serves as argument. The paper analyzes four speeches given by Donald Trump and Joe Biden, whereby the use of force on foreign grounds is justified via the ‘hero-protector’ narrative. The analytical framework combines the argumentation strategies of the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) with pragma-dialectics’ argumentation schemes. The analysis shows that each narrative sequence constituting the ‘hero-protector’ narrative constructs specific argument schemes, and the logical connections between these sequences link arguments in chains to collectively justify the rightness of claims. The paper, thus, seeks to illustrate the possibility of conceptualizing narrative discourse as an effective way to argue for or against a claim.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Narratives in the DHA and argumentation theory
  • 3.Operationalizing the hero-protector narrative as argument
  • 4.Data and analysis
    • 4.1Current aggression sequence
    • 4.2Past aggression and past reaction sequences
    • 4.3Current reaction sequence
    • 4.4Future idealized end state sequence
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Bergstrand, Kelly, and James M. Jasper. 2018. “Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control.” Theory Social Psychology Quarterly 81(3): 228–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bex, Floris, and Trevor J. Bench-Capon. 2017. “Arguing with stories.” In Narration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos, 31–46. Cham: Springer, pp. 31–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph. 1949. The hero with a Thousand Faces. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carranza, Isloda E. 1998. “Low Narrativity: Narratives and Argumentation.” Narrative Inquiry 8(2): 287–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. “Winning the Battle in Private Discourse: Rhetorical–logical Operations in Storytelling.” Discourse and Society 10(4): 509–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathon. 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clément, Maéva, Thomas Lindemann, and Eric Sangar. 2017. “The ‘Hero-Protector Narrative”: Manufacturing Emotional Consent for the Use of Force”. Political Psychology 38(6): 991–1008. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Donald. 2014. “Narrative as Deliberative Argument.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 7(1): 95–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Walter R. 1987. “Technical Logic, Rhetorical Logic, and Narrative Rationality.” Argumentation 1(1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard. 2014. “Historia magistra vitae: The topos of history as a teacher in public struggles of self and other representation”. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. ”Critique, Habermas and Narrative (genre): The Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies 18(3): 314–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Christoffer Kolvraa. 2012. “Narrating a ‘New Europe’: From ‘Bitter Past’ to Self-Righteousness?” Discourse & Society 23(4): 377–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy, and Lowell Ayers. 2012. “Logic, Parables, and Argument.” Informal Logic 32(2): 161–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groth, Stefan. 2019. “Political narratives / Narrations of the Political: An Introduction.” Narrative Culture 6(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoven, Paul. 2017. “Narratives and pragmatic arguments: Ivens’ The 400 Million.” In Narration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos, 103–122. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Peter, and Jens Ringsmose. 2015. “For our own security and for the sake of the Afghans: how the Danish public was persuaded to support an unprecedented costly military endeavour in Afghanistan.” In Strategic Narratives, Public Opinion, and War, ed. by Beatrice de Graaf, Dimitriu George, and Jens Ringsmose, 138–156. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jasper, James, Michael Young, and Elke Zuern. 2018. “Character Work in Social Movements.” Theory and Society 47 (1):113–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2009. “Plausible and fallacious strategies to silence one’s opponent.” In Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 61–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kvernbekk, Tone, and Ola Bøe-Hansen. 2017. “How to win wars: The role of the war narrative.” In Narration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos, 216–234. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies 23(2/3): 25–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Frederick W. 2014. Narrative Politics: Stories and Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGee, Michael, and John Nelson. 1985. “Narrative Reason in Public Argument.” Journal of Communication 35(4): 139–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlberger, Wolfgang. 2020. “Introduction: The power of narratives in political contexts.” In Political Narratives in the Middle East and North Africa: Conceptions of Order and Perceptions of Instability, ed. by Wolfgang Mühlberger, and Toni Alaranta, 1–17. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olmos, Paula. 2014. “Classical fables as arguments: Narration and analogy.” In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, ed. by Henrique J. Ribeiro, 189–208. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Story credibility in narrative arguments.” In Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 155–167 Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Molly, and Kristen Monroe. 1998. “Narrative in Political Science.” Annual Review Political Science 11: 315–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plumer, Gilbert. 2011. “Novels as arguments.” In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 1547–1558. Netherlands. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2020. ‘“Narrative!” I can’t hear that anymore’. A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change.” Critical Discourse Studies 18(3): 368–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The discourse historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Michael Meyer, 87–121 London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rheindorf, Markus, and Ruth Wodak. 2017. “It Was a Long, Hard Road: A Longitudinal Perspective on Discourses of Commemoration in Austria.” 10plus1: Living Linguistics 31: 22–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2018. “Sharing Values to Safeguard the Future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as Epideictic Rhetoric.” Discourse & Communication 12(2): 171–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. “Life in quest of narrative.” In On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, ed. by David Wood, 20–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2006. “Inter-textual relations: the quarrel over the Iraq war as a conflict between narrative types.” Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association 41(4): 403–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk. 1997. “There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved! Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8(4): 523–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, Christoph. 2010. “Narrative sequences in political discourse: Forms and functions in speeches and hypertext frameworks.” In Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society, 23(5): 605–649. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 2001. “Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction.” London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Stories and racism.” In Narrative and Social Control: Critical Perspectives, ed. by Dennis Mumby, 121–142. Newbury: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 1999. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.” Discourse Studies 1(4): 479–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels. 2009. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1997. Appeal to pity: Argumentum ad misericordiam. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Story similarity in arguments from analogy.” Informal Logic 321: 190–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wrisley, George. 2019. “Appeal to emotion: Pity”. In Bad arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy, ed.by Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce, 102–105. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Ruth Rodger, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žagar, Igor. 2009. “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
2025. Discourse of self-legitimation. Journal of Language and Politics 24:4 ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Shao, Peng, Zhongjing Pan, Jiaqi Bi & Zhi Li
2024. Media Shaping Heroes: An Analysis of Chinese Public’s Media Consumption and Heroic Identification. Journal of Social Service Research 50:5 ► pp. 857 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue