Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:6 (2023) ► pp.802–825
“Britain was already cherry-picking from the European tree without bothering to water the soil or tend to its branches”
A metaphorical study of the UK in Europe
Published online: 24 October 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22036.mil
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22036.mil
Abstract
Starting from the ambivalent discursive constructions of belongings and attachments, this paper is a description
of the uneasy and uncomfortable relation between the UK and the ‘continent’. It discusses the historical British insular attitude
looking at the metaphorical language used around Brexit, with a special emphasis on the metaphor “have one’s cake and eat it”,
referring to the “cherry-picking” attitude that the British government wishes to have, retaining EU membership benefits without
its obligations. Boris Johnson admitted that his policy on cake was “pro having it and pro eating it”, expressing an argument
that, on withdrawing from the European Union, Britain would still retain many of the benefits that it had enjoyed as a member,
since Britain was already “cherry-picking from the European tree without bothering to water the soil or tend to its branches”.
Keywords: ambivalent, Britain, cake, cherry, compromise, EU, metaphor
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A brief historic overview
- 3.“We are leaving the European Union but we are not leaving Europe”
- 4.Cake and cherry in the spoken corpus
- 4.1Cake in the spoken corpus
- 4.2Cherry in the spoken corpus
- 5.Cake and cherry in the written corpus: A buffet-style transition
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (27)
Bennett, Samuel. 2019. “Values as tools of legitimation in EU and UK Brexit discourses”. In Discourses of Brexit, edited by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 17–31. London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2019. Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daddow, Oliver. 2013. New Labour and the new European Union: Blair and Brown’s logic of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2015. Interpreting the outsider tradition in British European Policy Speeches from Thatcher to Cameron. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (1), 71–88.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Maccaferri, Marzia. 2019. “Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in re-narrating the European discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4), 389–402.
Miers, David. 2004. Britain in Europe: Community to Union 1973–2001. In Britain in the European Union: Law, policy and parliament, edited by Philip Giddings and Gavin Drewry, 12–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milizia, Denise. 2014. “In, out, or half way? The European attitude in the speeches of British leaders”. Lingue e Linguaggi 111, 157–175.
. 2019. “Pull up the drawbridge? Conventionality and creativity in British political discourse”, in Worlds of Words: Complexity, Creativity, and Conventionality in English Language, Literature and Culture 11, edited by Veronica Bonsignori, Gloria Cappelli and Elisa Mattiello, 293–309. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
Milizia, Denise and Cinzia Spinzi. 2020. “When a relationship ends, “there can be no turning back”. The divorce metaphor in the Brexit discourse”. Lingue e Linguaggi 341, 137–165.
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. Mirror images of Europe: Metaphors in public debate about Europe in Britain and Germany. Munich: Iudicium.
. 2013. “The heart of Europe: Synchronic variation and historical trajectories of a political metaphor”. In Speaking of Europe, edited by Kjersti Fløttum, 135–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2019. “Brexit as ‘having your cake and eating it’: the discourse career of a proverb”. In Discourses of Brexit, edited by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 208–221. London: Routledge.
Ruzza, Carlo and Milica Pejovic. 2019. “Populism at work: the language of the Brexiteers and the European Union”. Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4), 432–448.
Spinzi, Cinzia and Elena Manca. 2017. “Reading Figurative Images in the Political Discourse of the British Press”. Textus 11, 241–256.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
. 2016. “We have the character of an island nation”. A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg Speech” on the European Union. EUI RSCAS, 2016/36, Global Governance Programme-224, Europe in the World – [URL].
. 2021. The Politics of Fear. The shameless normalization of far-right discourse. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Zappettini, Franco. 2019a. “The official vision for ‘global Britain’. Brexit as rupture and continuity between free trade, liberal internationalism and ‘values’”. In Discourses of Brexit, ed. by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 140–154. London: Routledge.
