Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.219–238
Disalignment in the EU
Disagreement and face threats in international European Committee debates
Published online: 27 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22031.fra
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22031.fra
Abstract
European Union (EU) institutions are highly multilingual environments where international communication is very
goal-oriented, as they produce and define policies and regulations applied to all member states. This paper aims at exploring how
disagreements and conflicting opinions are conveyed in such contexts through the qualitative analysis of debates in recorded
meetings of the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Two meetings from two different
parliamentary terms (2014–2019 and 2019–2024) will be analyzed. The study will adopt a pragma-rhetorical approach, drawing on
studies on politeness and conversation analysis techniques and focusing especially on the management of Face Threatening Acts in
English turns. Attention will also be paid to language choice, codeswitching, and to the international use of English. Results
show that conflict and overt disagreements in the data are very rare, with speakers displaying instead careful mitigation of the
language used, especially when English is employed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: (un)parliamentary discourse
- 2.Disagreement in deliberative genres
- 3.Multilingualism and codeswitching in the EU
- 4.Data selection and analytical approach
- 5.Results
- 5.1Disagreements and mitigated face-threats
- 5.2Language choice and codeswitching
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription conventions
- Notes
References
References (34)
Amason, Allen C. 1996. “Distinguishing the Effects of
Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management
Teams.” Academy of Management
Journal 39 (1): 123–48.
Amason, Allen. C., and Harry. J. Sapienza. 1997. “The
Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive And Affective
Conflict.” Journal of
Management, 23 (4): 495–516.
Angouri, Jo. 2012. “Managing
Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.” Journal of
Pragmatics 441: 1565–79.
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising
Disagreement.” Journal of
Pragmatics 441: 1549–53.
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena. 2020. “Parliamentary
Impoliteness and the Interpreter’s
Gender.” Pragmatics 30 (4): 459–84.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheung, Ching Ching, and Kong Bieng Chuah. 2000. “Intergroup
Conflict Management Framework for Hong Kong’s Manufacturing Industry.” Engineering Management
Journal 12 (3): 26–33.
EEC Council. “Regulation No 1 Determining the
Languages to be Used by the European Economic
Community.” OJ 171, 6.10.1958: 385–86.
Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Political
Translation: How Social Movement Democracies
Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2012. “‘A
Simple Disagreement? A Row? Or a Massive Fall Out?’: On the Challenges of an Analytical
Task.” Journal of
Pragmatics 441: 1623–25.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Marianna Patrona. 2000. “Disagreements
in Television Discussions: How Small Can Small Screen Arguments
Be?” Pragmatics 10 (3): 323–38.
Hadjichristidis, Constantinos, Janet Geipel, and Lucia Savadori. 2015. “The
Effect of Foreign Language in Judgments of Risk and Benefit: The Role of Affect.” Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
Applied 21 (2): 117–29.
Harris, Sandra. 2011. “Being
Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political
Discourse.” Discourse &
Society 12 (4): 451–72.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Unparliamentary
Language: Insults as Cognitive Forms of Ideological
Confrontation.” In Language and Ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive
Cognitive Approaches, edited by René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank and Cornelia Ilie, 235–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003. “Histrionic
and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse.” Studies in Communication
Sciences 3 (1): 25–53.
. 2006. “Parliamentary
Discourses.” In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd
ed. Vol 91, edited by Keith Brown, 188–96. Oxford: Elsevier.
. 2010a. “Identity
Co-construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European
Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited
by Cornelia Ilie, 57–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010b. “Managing
Dissent and Interpersonal Relations in the Romanian Parliamentary
Discourse”. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse
Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 193–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2010. “Hegemonic
Multilingualism in/of the EU Institutions: An Inside-Outside Perspective on the European Language Policies and
Practices.” In Mehrsprachigkeit Aus Der Perspektive Zweier
Eu-projekte: DYLAN Meets LINEE, edited by Cornelia Hülmbauer, Eva Vetter and Heike Böhringer, 115–33. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Marra, Meredith. 2012. “Disagreeing
without being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider.” Journal of
Pragmatics 441: 1580–90.
Leal, Alice. 2021. English
and Translation in the European Union. Unity and Multiplicity in the Wake of
Brexit. London: Routledge.
Mehregan, Masoumeh, Eslamirasekh Abbass, Dabaghi Azizollah, and Jafari Seresht Davood. 2013. “Disagreement
Expressions in the Discourse of Young Persian Speakers.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral
Sciences 701: 598–604.
McCrae, Susan. 2009. “‘It’s
a Blokes’ Thing’: Gender, Occupational Roles and Talk in the
Workplace.” In Gender and Spoken
Interaction, edited by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 163–85. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy
Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion
Groups.” New Media &
Society 6 (2): 259–83.
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2012. “Affective
Processing in Bilingual Speakers: Disembodied Cognition?” International Journal of
Psychology 47 (6): 405–28.
Plug, H. José. 2010. “Ad-Hominen Arguments in the
Dutch and the European Parliaments: Strategic Manoeuvring in an Institutional
Context.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse
Strategies and Interaction ractices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ringe, Nils. 2022. The
Language(s) of Politics Multilingual Policy-Making in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stojanović, Nenad and Matteo Bonotti. 2020. “Political
Parties in Deeply Multilingual Polities: Institutional Conditions and Lessons for the
EU.” JCMS 58 (3): 599–615.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities
of Practice: Learning, Meaning and
Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, Michal. Krzyżanowski, and Bernhard Forchtner. 2012. “The
Interplay of Language Ideologies and Contextual Cues in Multilingual Interactions: Language Choice and Code-switching in
European Union Institutions.” Language in
Society 411: 157–86.
Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts. 2010. “Patterns
of Interaction in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: On the Pragmasemantics of Unauthorized Interruptive
Comments.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse
strategies and interaction practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
