Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:2 (2023) ► pp.204–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Activism or slacktivism?

A content-framing analysis of the 2020 #ChallengeAccepted campaign against feminicides in Turkey

ORCiD logo with link | University of Naples ‘L’Orientale’, Italy
Published online: 16 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22025.sco
Abstract
Online activism can be expressed through many forms. While advocates claim that it is a fully-fledged form of activism, opponents state that it is no more than vain ‘slacktivism’. Against this background, this work analyses the ‘#ChallengeAccepted’ movement, which went ‘viral’ in July 2020 to raise awareness about femi(ni)cides in Turkey, in the aftermath of the murder of the female student Pinar Gültekin. Focusing on the use of the hashtag via Twitter, the work embraces the perspective of online activism as a “continuum of participation”, composed of several levels. The results show how hashtag activism has worked as a means of knowledge dissemination and action, and that also slacktivism has contributed to the cause, thanks to the “oxygen of amplification” effect, which made users inform and get informed, refocus the campaign towards its original purpose when it digressed, and distribute its message.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pinar Gültekin’s murder and the #ChallengeAccepted movement
  • 3.Femi(ni)cides and the Istanbul Convention
  • 4.Theoretical framework, corpus, and methodology: Activism and slacktivism
  • 5.Results and findings
    • 5.1No reference to Turkey (SC1)
      • 5.1.1No active engagement or diversion towards another cause in SC1
      • 5.1.2Support in SC1
    • 5.2Reference to Turkey included (SC2)
      • 5.2.1No active engagement or diversion towards another cause in SC2
      • 5.2.2Support in SC2
      • 5.2.3Providing information and getting users involved
      • 5.2.4Getting users involved: Petitions and donations
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Akdemir, Dilar. 2021. Challenge Accepted. Hashtag Activism against Femicide in Turkey:A content analysis of the comments made under a post by the Instagram page ‘Stopfemicides’. BS thesis in Media and Culture. University of New Zealand.
Bakan, Ronay, and Seda Saluk. 2020. “Challenge Accepted? Systematic Erasures in Femicide Narratives from Turkey.” Jadaliyya, Aug.14. [URL] (accessed December 29, 2022).
Brunsting, Suzanne, and Tom Postmes. 2002. “Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age Predicting Offline and Online Collective Action.” Small Group Research 33(5), 525–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstensen, Martin. 2014. “Ideas are not as Stable as Political Scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change.” Political Studies 59(3), 596–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2011. The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention). Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
. 2021. Istanbul Convention-Country monitoring: Türkiye. Accessed Feb.3, 2023. [URL]
Dean, Jodi. 2009. Democracy and other Neoliberal Fantasies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennis, James. 2019. Beyond Slacktivism. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Devami” (ed.). 2020. Kadin Cinayetlerini Durduracağiz Platformu. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL] (accessed December 29, 2022).
European Institute for Gender Equality. 2019. Glossary of Definitions of Rape, Femicide and Intimate Partner Violence. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Foucault, Michel. 1970. “The Order of Things.” New Studies in Aesthetics 261, 117–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillespie, Lane Kirkland, Tara Richards, Eugena Givens, and Dwayne Smith. 2013. “Framing Deadly Domestic Violence: Why the media’s spin matters in newspaper coverage of femicide.” Violence Against Women 19(2), 222–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grzyb, Magdalena, Marceline Naudi, and Chaime Marcuello-Servós. 2018. “Femicide Definitions.” In Femicide across Europe: Theory, research and prevention, edited by Shalva Weil, Consuelo Corradi, and Marceline Naudi. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 17–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gulel, Devran, and Leïla Choukroune. 2021. “Turkey: Erdoğan’s decision to pull out of Istanbul Convention has put him in opposition to women.” The Conversation, 11 Apr. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Harlow, Summer, and Lei Guo. 2014. “Will the Revolution be Tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 463–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hürriyet Daily News. 2020. “Pinar-Gultekin Latest News, Top Stories – all news & analysis about Pinar-Gultekin.” Hürriyet Daily News. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Iranzo, Javier. 2015. “Reflections on Femicide and Violence against Women.” Working paper on femicide (unpublished), GESES. Universidad de Zaragoza. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Kaplan, Hilal. 2021. “Why did Turkey Withdraw from the Istanbul Convention?” Daily Sabah, 25 Mar. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. “Reliability in Content Analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations.” Human Communication Research 30(3), 411–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Yu-Hao, and Gary Hsieh. 2013. “Does Slacktivism Hurt Activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on HumanFactorsinComputingSystems. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maryville University. 2020. Me Too: Sexual harassment awareness & prevention. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Morozov, Evgeny. 2010. “Why the Internet is Failing Iran’s Activists.” ProspectMagazine, Jan.5. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Ofori-Parku, Sylvester Senyo, and Derek Moscato. 2018. “Hashtag Activism as a Form of Political Action: A qualitative analysis of the #BringBackOurGirls Campaign in Nigerian, UK, and US Press.” International Journal of Communication 121, 9–23. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
OHCHR. 2021. UN Women’s Rights Committee Urges Turkey to Reconsider Withdrawal fromIstanbul Convention as Decision Takes Effect. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Phillips, Whitney. 2018. “The Oxygen of Amplification.” Data & Society. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Potnis, Devendra Dilip, and Macy Halladay. 2021. “Role of Gatekeeping on Facebook in CreatingInformation Benefits for Vulnerable, Pregnant Women in the Rural United States.” Journal ofDocumentation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Diana. 2011. The Origin and Importance of the Term Femicide. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
The Guardian. 2020. “Challenge Accepted: Turkish feminists spell out real meaning of hashtag.” 31 July. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
UN Women. 2020. The Shadow Pandemic: Violence against women during Covid-19. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
White, Micah. 2010. “Clicktivism is Ruining Leftist Activism.” The Guardian, Aug.12. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022). [URL]
Wigmore-Shepherd, Daniel. 2020. “Factionalism and Violence within the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front.” ACLED, 23 Feb. Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Winslow, Evan, and Kim Thelwell. 2021. “We Will Stop Femicide. The Borgen project.” Accessed Dec. 29, 2022. [URL]
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Scotto di Carlo, Giuseppina
2025. Understanding Discourse and D.A.R.V.O.: Theories and Methods. In A Critical Discourse Analysis of Violence against Women [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Ulum, Ömer Gökhan
2025. Sociocultural and Legal Dimensions of Femicide and Gender-Based Violence in Turkey. Sexuality Research and Social Policy DOI logo
Wolbring, Gregor, Laiba Nasir & Dana Mahr
2024. Academic Coverage of Online Activism of Disabled People: A Scoping Review. Societies 14:11 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue